Dataset Information

Signatures of combinatorial regulation in intrinsic biological noise.

ABSTRACT: Gene expression is controlled by the action of transcription factors that bind to DNA and influence the rate at which a gene is transcribed. The quantitative mapping between the regulator concentrations and the output of the gene is known as the cis-regulatory input function (CRIF). Here, we show how the CRIF shapes the form of the joint probability distribution of molecular copy numbers of the regulators and the product of a gene. Namely, we derive a class of fluctuation-based relations that relate the moments of the distribution to the derivatives of the CRIF. These relations are useful because they enable statistics of naturally arising cell-to-cell variations in molecular copy numbers to substitute for traditional manipulations for probing regulatory mechanisms. We demonstrate that these relations can distinguish super- and subadditive gene regulatory scenarios (molecular analogs of AND and OR logic operations) in simulations that faithfully represent bacterial gene expression. Applications and extensions to other regulatory scenarios are discussed.

SUBMITTER: Warmflash A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2582248 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Signatures of combinatorial regulation in intrinsic biological noise.

Warmflash Aryeh A Dinner Aaron R AR

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20081103 45

Gene expression is controlled by the action of transcription factors that bind to DNA and influence the rate at which a gene is transcribed. The quantitative mapping between the regulator concentrations and the output of the gene is known as the cis-regulatory input function (CRIF). Here, we show how the CRIF shapes the form of the joint probability distribution of molecular copy numbers of the regulators and the product of a gene. Namely, we derive a class of fluctuation-based relations that re ...[more]

PMID: 18981421

Similar Datasets

Project description:Oscillatory dynamics are common in biological pathways, emerging from the coupling of positive and negative feedback loops. Due to the small numbers of molecules typically contained in cellular volumes, stochastic effects may play an important role in system behavior. Thus, for moderate noise strengths, stochasticity has been shown to enhance signal-to-noise ratios or even induce oscillations in a class of phenomena referred to as "stochastic resonance" and "coherence resonance," respectively. Furthermore, the biological oscillators are subject to influences from the division cycle of the cell. In this paper we consider a biologically relevant oscillator and investigate the effect of intrinsic noise as well as division cycle which encompasses the processes of growth, DNA duplication, and cell division. We first construct a minimal reaction network which can oscillate in the presence of large or negligible timescale separation. We then derive corresponding deterministic and stochastic models and compare their dynamical behaviors with respect to (i) the extent of the parameter space where each model can exhibit oscillatory behavior and (ii) the oscillation characteristics, namely, the amplitude and the period. We further incorporate division cycle effects on both models and investigate the effect of growth rate on system behavior. Our results show that in the presence but not in the absence of large timescale separation, coherence resonance effects result in extending the oscillatory region and lowering the period for the stochastic model. When the division cycle is taken into account, the oscillatory region of the deterministic model is shown to extend or shrink for moderate or high growth rates, respectively. Further, under the influence of the division cycle, the stochastic model can oscillate for parameter sets for which the deterministic model does not. The division cycle is also found to be able to resonate with the oscillator, thereby enhancing oscillation robustness. The results of this study can give valuable insight into the complex interplay between oscillatory intracellular dynamics and various noise sources, stemming from gene expression, cell growth, and division.

Project description:BackgroundMany prokaryotic transcription factors repress their own transcription. It is often asserted that such regulation enables a cell to homeostatically maintain protein abundance. We explore the role of negative self regulation of transcription in regulating the variability of protein abundance using a variety of stochastic modeling techniques.ResultsWe undertake a novel analysis of a classic model for negative self regulation. We demonstrate that, with standard approximations, protein variance relative to its mean should be independent of repressor strength in a physiological range. Consequently, in that range, the coefficient of variation would increase with repressor strength. However, stochastic computer simulations demonstrate that there is a greater increase in noise associated with strong repressors than predicted by theory. The discrepancies between the mathematical analysis and computer simulations arise because with strong repressors the approximation that leads to Michaelis-Menten-like hyperbolic repression terms ceases to be valid. Because we observe that strong negative feedback increases variability and so is unlikely to be a mechanism for noise control, we suggest instead that negative feedback is evolutionarily favoured because it allows the cell to minimize mRNA usage. To test this, we used in silico evolution to demonstrate that while negative feedback can achieve only a modest improvement in protein noise reduction compared with the unregulated system, it can achieve good improvement in protein response times and very substantial improvement in reducing mRNA levels.ConclusionStrong negative self regulation of transcription may not always be a mechanism for homeostatic control of protein abundance, but instead might be evolutionarily favoured as a mechanism to limit the use of mRNA. The use of hyperbolic terms derived from quasi-steady-state approximation should also be avoided in the analysis of stochastic models with strong repressors.

Dataset Information

Signatures of combinatorial regulation in intrinsic biological noise.

Publications

Signatures of combinatorial regulation in intrinsic biological noise.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets