Dataset Information

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Small clinical studies of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy for cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction (MI) have yielded divergent results. The effect of G-CSF therapy on left ventricular (LV) function and structure in these patients remains unclear.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL database of controlled clinical trials (July 2007) for randomized controlled trials of G-CSF therapy in patients with acute MI. We conducted a fixed-effects meta-analysis across 8 eligible studies (n = 385 patients).

Results

Compared with controls, G-CSF therapy increased LV ejection fraction (EF) by 1.09%, increased LV scar size by 0.22%, decreased LV end-diastolic volume by 4.26 mL, and decreased LV end-systolic volume by 2.50 mL. None of these effects were statistically significant. The risk of death, recurrent MI, and in-stent restenosis was similar in G-CSF-treated patients and controls. Subgroup analysis revealed a modest but statistically significant increase in EF (4.73%, P < .0001) with G-CSF therapy in studies that enrolled patients with mean EF <50% at baseline. Subgroup analysis also showed a significant increase in EF (4.65%, P < .0001) when G-CSF was administered relatively early (< or =37 hours) after the acute event.

Conclusions

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy in unselected patients with acute MI appears safe but does not provide an overall benefit. Subgroup analyses suggest that G-CSF therapy may be salutary in acute MI patients with LV dysfunction and when started early. Larger randomized studies may be conducted to evaluate the potential benefits of early G-CSF therapy in acute MI patients with LV dysfunction.

SUBMITTER: Abdel-Latif A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2597495 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Abdel-Latif Ahmed A Bolli Roberto R Zuba-Surma Ewa K EK Tleyjeh Imad M IM Hornung Carlton A CA Dawn Buddhadeb B

American heart journal 20080620 2

<h4>Background</h4>Small clinical studies of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy for cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction (MI) have yielded divergent results. The effect of G-CSF therapy on left ventricular (LV) function and structure in these patients remains unclear.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL database of controlled clinical trials (July 2007) for randomized controlled trials of G-CSF therap ...[more]

PMID: 18657649

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment has been proposed as a therapeutic option for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH). The aim of this study was to synthesise available evidence on the efficacy of G-CSF in AH.MethodsThis is a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the risk of death at 90 days and the risk of infection.ResultsSeven studies were included. Of a total of 396 patients, 336 had AH, 197 patients were treated with G-CSF, and 199 received placebo or pentoxifylline. In overall meta-analysis, G-CSF therapy was associated with a reduced risk of death at 90 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.88; p = 0.03). There was high heterogeneity between studies (p <0.001; I 2 = 80%). Five studies were performed in Asia and 2 in Europe. In the subgroup analysis of studies performed in Asia, G-CSF was associated with a reduced risk of death (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.08-0.28; p <0.001; heterogeneity: p = 0.5, I 2 = 0%). In European studies, G-CSF tended to increase mortality compared with controls, although the difference was not significant (OR 1.89; 95% CI 0.90-3.98; p = 0.09; heterogeneity: p = 0.8, I 2 = 0%). In Asian studies, occurrence of infection was less frequent in G-CSF patients than in controls (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.06-0.23; p <0.001; heterogeneity: p = 0.7, I 2 = 0%), whilst in European studies, this occurrence was not statistically different (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.50-1.68; p = 0.78; heterogeneity: p = 0.5, I 2 = 0%). In sensitivity analyses, excluding studies that included patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) other than AH, patients with less severe AH, or patients with non-response to corticosteroids, results were similar to those of overall analyses, both for mortality and occurrence of infection.ConclusionsGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy may improve the prognosis of patients with severe AH. However, owing to the high heterogeneity observed in the overall analysis caused by conflicting results between the Asian and European studies, G-CSF cannot currently be recommended for AH, particularly in Europe. Whether these differences can be explained by ethnic differences or disparities in patient selection and disease severity remains unclear.Lay summaryThe main finding of this meta-analysis is that the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is associated with a mortality reduction of more than 70% at 3 months amongst patients with alcoholic hepatitis (AH) compared with controls who did not receive this therapy. However, owing to the high heterogeneity observed in the overall analysis caused by conflicting results between the Asian and European studies, G-CSF cannot currently be recommended for patients with AH, particularly in Europe. Whether these differences can be explained by ethnic differences or disparities in patient selection and disease severity remains unclear.

Dataset Information

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for cardiac repair after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets