Unknown

Dataset Information

0

T-cell epitope prediction: rescaling can mask biological variation between MHC molecules.


ABSTRACT: Theoretical methods for predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes are an important tool in vaccine design and for enhancing our understanding of the cellular immune system. The most popular methods currently available produce binding affinity predictions across a range of MHC molecules. In comparing results between these MHC molecules, it is common practice to apply a normalization procedure known as rescaling, to correct for possible discrepancies between the allelic predictors. Using two of the most popular prediction software packages, NetCTL and NetMHC, we tested the hypothesis that rescaling removes genuine biological variation from the predicted affinities when comparing predictions across a number of MHC molecules. We found that removing the condition of rescaling improved the prediction software's performance both qualitatively, in terms of ranking epitopes, and quantitatively, in the accuracy of their binding affinity predictions. We suggest that there is biologically significant variation among class 1 MHC molecules and find that retention of this variation leads to significantly more accurate epitope prediction.

SUBMITTER: MacNamara A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2650421 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

T-cell epitope prediction: rescaling can mask biological variation between MHC molecules.

MacNamara Aidan A   Kadolsky Ulrich U   Bangham Charles R M CR   Asquith Becca B  

PLoS computational biology 20090320 3


Theoretical methods for predicting CD8+ T-cell epitopes are an important tool in vaccine design and for enhancing our understanding of the cellular immune system. The most popular methods currently available produce binding affinity predictions across a range of MHC molecules. In comparing results between these MHC molecules, it is common practice to apply a normalization procedure known as rescaling, to correct for possible discrepancies between the allelic predictors. Using two of the most pop  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| PRJEB24387 | ENA
2010-04-01 | GSE17736 | GEO
2010-04-01 | E-GEOD-17736 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC7106517 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6885703 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1838733 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8301869 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7379379 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6820532 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3085167 | biostudies-literature