Dataset Information

Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability.

ABSTRACT: In this study we illustrate how the functional networks involved in a single task (e.g. the sensory, cognitive and motor components) can be segregated without cognitive subtractions at the second-level. The method used is based on meaningful variability in the patterns of activation between subjects with the assumption that regions belonging to the same network will have comparable variations from subject to subject. fMRI data were collected from thirty nine healthy volunteers who were asked to indicate with a button press if visually presented words were semantically related or not. Voxels were classified according to the similarity in their patterns of between-subject variance using a second-level unsupervised fuzzy clustering algorithm. The results were compared to those identified by cognitive subtractions of multiple conditions tested in the same set of subjects. This illustrated that the second-level clustering approach (on activation for a single task) was able to identify the functional networks observed using cognitive subtractions (e.g. those associated with vision, semantic associations or motor processing). In addition the fuzzy clustering approach revealed other networks that were not dissociated by the cognitive subtraction approach (e.g. those associated with high- and low-level visual processing and oculomotor movements). We discuss the potential applications of our method which include the identification of "hidden" or unpredicted networks as well as the identification of systems level signatures for different subgroupings of clinical and healthy populations.

SUBMITTER: Seghier ML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2652023 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability.

Seghier Mohamed L ML Price Cathy J CJ

NeuroImage 20081225 2

In this study we illustrate how the functional networks involved in a single task (e.g. the sensory, cognitive and motor components) can be segregated without cognitive subtractions at the second-level. The method used is based on meaningful variability in the patterns of activation between subjects with the assumption that regions belonging to the same network will have comparable variations from subject to subject. fMRI data were collected from thirty nine healthy volunteers who were asked to ...[more]

PMID: 19150501

Similar Datasets

Project description:The stop signal task has been used to quantify the human inhibitory control. The inter-subject and intra-subject variability was investigated under the inhibition of human response with a realistic environmental scenario. In present study, we used a battleground scenario where a sniper-scope picture was the background, a target picture was a go signal, and a nontarget picture was a stop signal. The task instructions were to respond on the target image and inhibit the response if a nontarget image appeared. This scenario produced a threatening situation and endorsed the evaluation of how subject's response inhibition manifests in a real situation. In this study, 32 channels of electroencephalography (EEG) signals were collected from 20 participants during successful stop (response inhibition) and failed stop (response) trials. These EEG signals were used to predict two possible outcomes: successful stop or failed stop. The inter-subject variability (between-subjects) and intra-subject variability (within-subjects) affect the performance of participants in the classification system. The EEG signals of successful stop versus failed stop trials were classified using quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) (i.e., parametric) and K-nearest neighbor classifier (KNNC) and Parzen density-based (PARZEN) (i.e., nonparametric) under inter- and intra-subject variability. The EEG activities were found to increase during response inhibition in the frontal cortex (F3 and F4), presupplementary motor area (C3 and C4), parietal lobe (P3 and P4), and occipital (O1 and O2) lobe. Therefore, power spectral density (PSD) of EEG signals (1-50Hz) in F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, O1, and O2 electrodes were measured in successful stop and failed stop trials. The PSD of the EEG signals was used as the feature input for the classifiers. Our proposed method shows an intra-subject classification accuracy of 97.61% for subject 15 with QDA classifier in C3 (left motor cortex) and an overall inter-subject classification accuracy of 71.66% ± 9.81% with the KNNC classifier in F3 (left frontal lobe). These results display how inter-subject and intra-subject variability affects the performance of the classification system. These findings can be used effectively to improve the psychopathology of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), schizophrenia, and suicidality.

Dataset Information

Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability.

Publications

Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets