Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome.


ABSTRACT: Humans tend to modify their attitudes to align with past action. For example, after choosing between similarly valued alternatives, people rate the selected option as better than they originally did, and the rejected option as worse. However, it is unknown whether these modifications in evaluation reflect an underlying change in the physiological representation of a stimulus' expected hedonic value and our emotional response to it. Here, we addressed this question by combining participants' estimations of the pleasure they will derive from future events, with brain imaging data recorded while they imagined those events, both before, and after, choosing between them. Participants rated the selected alternatives as better after the decision stage relative to before, whereas discarded alternatives were valued less. Our functional magnetic resonance imaging findings reveal that postchoice changes in preference are tracked in caudate nucleus activity. Specifically, the difference in blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal associated with the selected and rejected stimuli was enhanced after a decision was taken, reflecting the choice that had just been made. This finding suggests that the physiological representation of a stimulus' expected hedonic value is altered by a commitment to it. Furthermore, before any revaluation induced by the decision process, our data show that BOLD signal in this same region reflects the choices we are likely to make at a later time.

SUBMITTER: Sharot T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2675705 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome.

Sharot Tali T   De Martino Benedetto B   Dolan Raymond J RJ  

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20090301 12


Humans tend to modify their attitudes to align with past action. For example, after choosing between similarly valued alternatives, people rate the selected option as better than they originally did, and the rejected option as worse. However, it is unknown whether these modifications in evaluation reflect an underlying change in the physiological representation of a stimulus' expected hedonic value and our emotional response to it. Here, we addressed this question by combining participants' esti  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2923025 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2605808 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC11247951 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5764979 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5895019 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5054047 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10871315 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7646213 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7722471 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10170207 | biostudies-literature