Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA.


ABSTRACT: The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexes have focused on DNA. Here, we present a comparative investigation of electrostatic effects in RNA and DNA. Using resonant (anomalous) and non-resonant small-angle X-ray scattering, we characterized the charge screening efficiency and counterion distribution around short (25 bp) dsDNA and RNA molecules of comparable sequence. Consistent with theoretical predictions, we find counterion mediated screening to be more efficient for dsRNA than dsDNA. Furthermore, the topology of the RNA A-form helix alters the spatial distribution of counterions relative to B-form DNA. The experimental results reported here agree well with ion-size-corrected non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann calculations. We propose that differences in electrostatic properties aid in selective recognition of different types of short nucleic acid helices by target binding partners.

SUBMITTER: Pabit SA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2709557 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Both helix topology and counterion distribution contribute to the more effective charge screening in dsRNA compared with dsDNA.

Pabit Suzette A SA   Qiu Xiangyun X   Lamb Jessica S JS   Li Li L   Meisburger Steve P SP   Pollack Lois L  

Nucleic acids research 20090424 12


The recent discovery of the RNA interference mechanism emphasizes the biological importance of short, isolated, double-stranded (ds) RNA helices and calls for a complete understanding of the biophysical properties of dsRNA. However, most previous studies of the electrostatics of nucleic acid duplexes have focused on DNA. Here, we present a comparative investigation of electrostatic effects in RNA and DNA. Using resonant (anomalous) and non-resonant small-angle X-ray scattering, we characterized  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3647158 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8395631 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6478819 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2084238 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8392785 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6316034 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6258832 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10583700 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7427784 | biostudies-literature
2024-01-26 | PXD032398 | Pride