Dataset Information

An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Recent work has shown that population stratification can have confounding effects on genetic association studies and statistical methods have been developed to correct for these effects. Subsets of markers that are highly-differentiated between populations, ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), have been used to correct for population stratification. Often AIMs are discovered in one set of populations and then employed in a different set of populations. The underlying assumption in these cases is that the population under study has the same substructure as the population in which the AIMs were discovered. The present study assesses this assumption and evaluates the portability between worldwide populations of 10 SNPs found to be highly-differentiated within Britain (BritAIMs). METHODS:We genotyped 10 BritAIMs in approximately 1000 individuals from 53 populations worldwide. We assessed the degree to which these 10 BritAIMs capture population stratification in other groups of populations by use of the Fst statistic. We used Fst values from 2750 random markers typed in the same set of individuals as an empirical distribution to which the Fst values of the 10 BritAIMs were compared. RESULTS:Allele frequency differences between continental groups for the BritAIMs are not unusually high. This is also the case for comparisons within continental groups distantly related to Britain. However, two BritAIMs show high Fst between European populations and two BritAIMs show high Fst between populations from the Middle East. Overall the median Fst across all BritAIMs is not unusually high compared to the empirical distribution. CONCLUSION:We find that BritAIMs are generally not useful to distinguish between continental groups or within continental groups distantly related to Britain. Moreover, our analyses suggest that the portability of AIMs across geographical scales (e.g. between Europe and Britain) can be limited and should therefore be taken into consideration in the design and interpretation of genetic association studies.

SUBMITTER: Myles S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2719660 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations.

Myles Sean S Stoneking Mark M Timpson Nic N

BMC medical genomics 20090720

<h4>Background</h4>Recent work has shown that population stratification can have confounding effects on genetic association studies and statistical methods have been developed to correct for these effects. Subsets of markers that are highly-differentiated between populations, ancestry-informative markers (AIMs), have been used to correct for population stratification. Often AIMs are discovered in one set of populations and then employed in a different set of populations. The underlying assumptio ...[more]

PMID: 19619313

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: Human populations are often highly structured due to differences in genetic ancestry among groups, posing difficulties in associating genes with diseases. Ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) aid in the detection of population stratification and provide an alternative approach to map population-specific alleles to disease. Here, we identify and characterize a novel set of African AIMs that separate populations of African ancestry from other global populations including those of European ancestry. Methods: Using data from the 1000 Genomes Project, highly informative SNP markers from five African subpopulations were selected based on estimates of informativeness (In) and compared against the European population to generate a final set of 46,737 African ancestry-informative markers (AIMs). The AIMs identified were validated using an independent set and functionally annotated using tools like SIFT, PolyPhen. They were also investigated for representation of commonly used SNP arrays. Results: This set of African AIMs effectively separates populations of African ancestry from other global populations and further identifies substructure between populations of African ancestry. When a subset of these AIMs was studied in an independent dataset, they differentiated people who self-identify as African American or Black from those who identify their ancestry as primarily European. Most of the AIMs were found to be in their intergenic and intronic regions with only 0.6% in the coding regions of the genome. Most of the commonly used SNP array investigated contained less than 10% of the AIMs. Discussion: While several functional annotations of both coding and non-coding African AIMs are supported by the literature and linked these high-frequency African alleles to diseases in African populations, more effort is needed to map genes to diseases in these genetically diverse subpopulations. The relative dearth of these African AIMs on current genotyping platforms (the array with the highest fraction, llumina's Omni 5, harbors less than a quarter of AIMs), further demonstrates a greater need to better represent historically understudied populations.

Dataset Information

An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations.

Publications

An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets