Dataset Information

Oral administration of the GnRH antagonist acyline, in a GIPET-enhanced tablet form, acutely suppresses serum testosterone in normal men: single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

ABSTRACT: GnRH analogs are useful for the treatment of prostate cancer, but require parenteral administration. The peptide GnRH antagonist acyline potently suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone in man; however, its clinical utility is limited by the requirement for frequent injections. The use of a proprietary enhancer system called GIPET, which is based on medium-chain fatty acids, facilitates the oral bioavailability of peptides. We hypothesized that GIPET enhancement would allow for the safe oral dosing of acyline for the treatment of prostate cancer.We enrolled eight healthy young men in a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of 10, 20 and 40 mg doses of GIPET-enhanced oral acyline. Blood for measurement of serum LH, FSH, testosterone and acyline was obtained prior to each dose of GIPET-enhanced oral acyline and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after dosing.Serum LH, FSH and serum testosterone were significantly suppressed by all doses of GIPET-enhanced oral acyline after 6 h, with suppression reaching a nadir 12 h after dosing. In addition, the 20 and 40 mg doses demonstrated sustained suppression of testosterone for 12-24 h. All hormone concentrations returned to normal 48 h after administration. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, and laboratory assessments, including liver function tests and creatinine, were unaffected by treatment.Oral administration of GIPET-enhanced acyline significantly suppresses testosterone and gonadotropins in normal men without untoward side effects and might have utility in the management of prostate cancer.

SUBMITTER: Amory JK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2721900 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Oral administration of the GnRH antagonist acyline, in a GIPET-enhanced tablet form, acutely suppresses serum testosterone in normal men: single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Amory John Kenneth JK Leonard Thomas W TW Page Stephanie T ST O'Toole Edel E McKenna Michael J MJ Bremner William J WJ

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 20090529 3

<h4>Purpose</h4>GnRH analogs are useful for the treatment of prostate cancer, but require parenteral administration. The peptide GnRH antagonist acyline potently suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone in man; however, its clinical utility is limited by the requirement for frequent injections. The use of a proprietary enhancer system called GIPET, which is based on medium-chain fatty acids, facilitates the oral bioavailability of peptides. We hypothesized that GIPET enhancement woul ...[more]

PMID: 19479252

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:A new combination tablet containing sublingual testosterone and oral buspirone (T+B) was developed to benefit a subgroup of women suffering from female sexual interest/arousal disorder, caused by dysfunctionally overactive sexual inhibition. AIM:The aim of this study was to compare the effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of buspirone, administered as a dual-route, dual-release combination tablet containing 0.5 mg testosterone (T) and 10 mg buspirone (B). METHODS:19 healthy women took T+B under fed and fasted conditions during 2 overnight visits. The blood was sampled over a 24-hour period to determine the pharmacokinetics of buspirone and its active metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)piperazine (1-PP). Total testosterone levels were also assessed, at 5 time points and for quality control purposes only, as sublingual testosterone uptake is not expected to be influenced by prior food intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:PK profiles of buspirone and 1-PP. RESULTS:For buspirone, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the observed fed/fasted ratios for the plasma area under the curve (AUC)0-last, AUC0-inf, and Cmax after administration of T+B were not contained within the prespecified bounds of 80% and 125%, except for the lower bound of AUC0-inf. However, the 90% CIs of the observed fed/fasted ratios for the plasma AUC0-last, AUC0-inf, and Cmax of 1-PP were contained within the prespecified bounds, with the exception of the upper bound for Cmax. The mean AUCs and Cmax for 1-PP did not differ between fed and fasted conditions. CONCLUSIONS:Administration of T+B after high-caloric food intake increased the bioavailability of buspirone but did not result in differences in Tmax when compared with fasted conditions. Both in fed and fasted conditions, T+B was generally well tolerated and safe. Exposure of 1-PP in fed and fasted conditions was comparable in both conditions. These results demonstrate that T+B can safely and effectively be used in both fed and fasted states. Gerritsen J, Bloemers J, van Rooij K, et al. The Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Buspirone After Single Administration of a Sublingual Testosterone and Oral Buspirone Combination Tablet in Healthy Female Subjects. J Sex Med 2020;8:186-194.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve.MethodsWe searched the PubMed (1992-2016), Cochrane Library (1999-2016), Web of Science (1950-2016), Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979-2016), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1994-2016). Any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared GnRH-ant protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve were included, and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software.ResultsTwenty-nine RCTs (6399 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Stimulation days (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = -0.8 [-1.36, -0.23], P = 0.006), gonadotrophin (Gn) dosage (MD [95% CI] = -3.52 [-5.56, -1.48], P = 0.0007), estradiol (E2) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration (MD [95% CI] = -365.49 [-532.93, -198.05], P<0.0001), the number of oocytes retrieved (MD [95% CI] = -1.41 [-1.84, -0.99], P<0.00001), the embryos obtained (MD [95% CI] = -0.99 [-1.38, -0.59], P<0.00001), incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (OR [95% CI] = 0.69 [0.57, 0.83], P<0.0001) were statistically significantly lower in GnRH-ant protocol than GnRH-a long protocol. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.80, 1.01], P = 0.08), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.77, 1.00], P = 0.05), live birth rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.95 [0.74, 1.09], P = 0.27), miscarriage rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.98 [0.69, 1.40], P = 0.93), and cycle cancellation rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.52, 1.44], P = 0.57) showed no significant differences between the two groups.ConclusionGnRH-ant protocol substantially decreased the incidence of OHSS without influencing the pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to GnRH-a long protocol among patients with normal ovarian reserve.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Excessive neutrophil presence and activation is important in a number of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. The CXCR2 chemokine receptor is important in controlling the extravasation and activation of neutrophils. Selective antagonism of the CXCR2 receptor is a potential approach to reducing neutrophil migration and activation. Danirixin, is a small molecule, CXCR2 antagonist being evaluated as a potential anti-inflammatory medicine. METHODS:(1) First time in human (FTIH) double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending and repeat oral doses of danirixin in healthy male subjects; (2) single-dose study of age, gender, food, and proton-pump inhibitor effects on the pharmacokinetics of danirixin in healthy adult subjects; and placebo-controlled study of the pharmacokinetics of danirixin in healthy elderly subjects. RESULTS:There were no serious adverse events and no adverse events considered to be of clinical relevance. There were no withdrawals due to adverse events. Systemic exposure following single doses of danirixin 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg increased with increasing dose. Engagement of pharmacology was demonstrated as inhibition of ex-vivo CXCL1-induced CD11b expression on peripheral blood neutrophils when compared to placebo (approximately 50% for 50 mg and 100 mg danirixin, and 72% at 200 mg). There was a 37% decrease in Cmax and a 16% decrease in AUC (0-?) following administration of danirixin in the presence of food. Cmax also decreased by 65% when danirixin 100 mg was administered following omeprazole 40 mg once daily for 5 days. The AUC (0-?) and Cmax were 50% lower in elderly subjects compared with younger subjects. CONCLUSION:The dose-dependent inhibition of agonist-induced neutrophil activation following single and repeated once daily oral administration of danirixin suggests that this CXCR2 antagonist may have benefit in neutrophil-predominant inflammatory diseases. Co-administration with food, gastric acid reducing agents, and variable exposure in the elderly have important clinical implications that need to be taken into consideration in subsequent clinical evaluations. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01209052 and NCT01209104.

Dataset Information

Oral administration of the GnRH antagonist acyline, in a GIPET-enhanced tablet form, acutely suppresses serum testosterone in normal men: single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Publications

Oral administration of the GnRH antagonist acyline, in a GIPET-enhanced tablet form, acutely suppresses serum testosterone in normal men: single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets