Dataset Information

SNAD: Sequence Name Annotation-based Designer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A growing diversity of biological data is tagged with unique identifiers (UIDs) associated with polynucleotides and proteins to ensure efficient computer-mediated data storage, maintenance, and processing. These identifiers, which are not informative for most people, are often substituted by biologically meaningful names in various presentations to facilitate utilization and dissemination of sequence-based knowledge. This substitution is commonly done manually that may be a tedious exercise prone to mistakes and omissions. RESULTS: Here we introduce SNAD (Sequence Name Annotation-based Designer) that mediates automatic conversion of sequence UIDs (associated with multiple alignment or phylogenetic tree, or supplied as plain text list) into biologically meaningful names and acronyms. This conversion is directed by precompiled or user-defined templates that exploit wealth of annotation available in cognate entries of external databases. Using examples, we demonstrate how this tool can be used to generate names for practical purposes, particularly in virology. CONCLUSION: A tool for controllable annotation-based conversion of sequence UIDs into biologically meaningful names and acronyms has been developed and placed into service, fostering links between quality of sequence annotation, and efficiency of communication and knowledge dissemination among researchers.

SUBMITTER: Sidorov IA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2739203 | biostudies-literature | 2009

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

SNAD: Sequence Name Annotation-based Designer.

Sidorov Igor A IA Reshetov Denis A DA Gorbalenya Alexander E AE

BMC bioinformatics 20090814

<h4>Background</h4>A growing diversity of biological data is tagged with unique identifiers (UIDs) associated with polynucleotides and proteins to ensure efficient computer-mediated data storage, maintenance, and processing. These identifiers, which are not informative for most people, are often substituted by biologically meaningful names in various presentations to facilitate utilization and dissemination of sequence-based knowledge. This substitution is commonly done manually that may be a te ...[more]

PMID: 19682364

Similar Datasets

Project description:Clinical genomic testing is dependent on the robust identification and reporting of variant-level information in relation to disease. With the shift to high-throughput sequencing, a major challenge for clinical diagnostics is the cross-identification of variants called on their genomic position to resources that rely on transcript- or protein-based descriptions.We evaluated the accuracy of three tools (SnpEff, Variant Effect Predictor, and Variation Reporter) that generate transcript and protein-based variant nomenclature from genomic coordinates according to guidelines by the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS). Our evaluation was based on transcript-controlled comparisons to a manually curated set of 126 test variants of various types drawn from data sources, each with HGVS-compliant transcript and protein descriptors. We further evaluated the concordance between annotations generated by Snpeff and Variant Effect Predictor and those in major germline and cancer databases: ClinVar and COSMIC, respectively.We find that there is substantial discordance between the annotation tools and databases in the description of insertions and/or deletions. Using our ground truth set of variants, constructed specifically to identify challenging events, accuracy was between 80 and 90% for coding and 50 and 70% for protein changes for 114 to 126 variants. Exact concordance for SNV syntax was over 99.5% between ClinVar and Variant Effect Predictor and SnpEff, but less than 90% for non-SNV variants. For COSMIC, exact concordance for coding and protein SNVs was between 65 and 88% and less than 15% for insertions. Across the tools and datasets, there was a wide range of different but equivalent expressions describing protein variants.Our results reveal significant inconsistency in variant representation across tools and databases. While some of these syntax differences may be clear to a clinician, they can confound variant matching, an important step in variant classification. These results highlight the urgent need for the adoption and adherence to uniform standards in variant annotation, with consistent reporting on the genomic reference, to enable accurate and efficient data-driven clinical care.

Dataset Information

SNAD: Sequence Name Annotation-based Designer.

Publications

SNAD: Sequence Name Annotation-based Designer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure