Dataset Information

Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We compared the efficacy of two different taxanes, docetaxel and paclitaxel, given either weekly or every 3 weeks, in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Methods

We enrolled 4950 women with axillary lymph node-positive or high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer. After randomization, all patients first received 4 cycles of intravenous doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide at 3-week intervals and were then assigned to intravenous paclitaxel or docetaxel given at 3-week intervals for 4 cycles or at 1-week intervals for 12 cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival.

Results

As compared with patients receiving standard therapy (paclitaxel every 3 weeks), the odds ratio for disease-free survival was 1.27 among those receiving weekly paclitaxel (P=0.006), 1.23 among those receiving docetaxel every 3 weeks (P=0.02), and 1.09 among those receiving weekly docetaxel (P=0.29) (with an odds ratio >1 favoring the groups receiving experimental therapy). As compared with standard therapy, weekly paclitaxel was also associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 1.32; P=0.01). An exploratory analysis of a subgroup of patients whose tumors expressed no human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 protein found similar improvements in disease-free and overall survival with weekly paclitaxel treatment, regardless of hormone-receptor expression. Grade 2, 3, or 4 neuropathy was more frequent with weekly paclitaxel than with paclitaxel every 3 weeks (27% vs. 20%).

Conclusions

Weekly paclitaxel after standard adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves disease-free and overall survival in women with breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004125 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

SUBMITTER: Sparano JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2743943 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTrastuzumab is a life-saving therapy but is associated with symptomatic and asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline. We report the cardiac toxic effects of a nonanthracycline and trastuzumab-based treatment for patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2, formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive breast cancer.ObjectiveTo determine the cardiac safety of paclitaxel with trastuzumab and the utility of LVEF monitoring in patients with node-negative, ERBB2-positive breast cancer.Design, setting, and participantsIn this secondary analysis of an uncontrolled, single group study across 14 medical centers, enrollment of 406 patients with node-negative, ERBB2-positive breast cancer 3 cm, or smaller, and baseline LVEF of greater than or equal to 50% occurred from October 9, 2007, to September 3, 2010. Patients with a micrometastasis in a lymph node were later allowed with a study amendment. Median patient age was 55 years, 118 (29%) had hypertension, and 30 (7%) had diabetes. Patients received adjuvant paclitaxel for 12 weeks with trastuzumab, and trastuzumab was continued for 1 year. Median follow-up was 4 years.InterventionsTreatment consisted of weekly 80-mg/m2 doses of paclitaxel administered concurrently with trastuzumab intravenously for 12 weeks, followed by trastuzumab monotherapy for 39 weeks. During the monotherapy phase, trastuzumab could be administered weekly 2-mg/kg or every 3 weeks as 6-mg/kg. Radiation and hormone therapy were administered per standard guidelines after completion of the 12 weeks of chemotherapy. Patient LVEF was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year.Main outcomes and measuresCardiac safety data, including grade 3 to 4 left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and significant asymptomatic LVEF decline, as defined by our study, were reported.ResultsOverall, 2 patients (0.5%) (95% CI, 0.1%-1.8%) developed grade 3 LVSD and came off study, and 13 (3.2%) (95% CI, 1.9%-5.4%) had significant asymptomatic LVEF decline, 11 of whom completed study treatment. Median LVEF at baseline was 65%; 12 weeks, 64%; 6 months, 64%; and 1 year, 64%.Conclusions and relevanceCardiac toxic effects from paclitaxel with trastuzumab, manifesting as grade 3 or 4 LVSD or asymptomatic LVEF decline, were low. Patient LVEF was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year, and our findings suggest that LVEF monitoring during trastuzumab therapy without anthracyclines could be simplified for many individuals.

Project description:BackgroundPaclitaxel treatment produces significant peripheral neuropathy, but the time course of neuropathy development and outcomes are unclear. Dose reduction is the only strategy to prevent neurotoxicity, however, the impact of dose-reduction on neuropathy outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to prospectively evaluated neuropathy development from weekly paclitaxel treatment and evaluate the impact of dose-reduction on post-treatment neuropathy outcomes.Patients and methodsBreast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel (80mg/m2 ) weekly for 12-weeks were prospectively assessed using patient reported (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity; FACTGOG-Ntx), clinical (Total Neuropathy Score clinical version; TNSc) and neurophysiological measures up to 12-months post completion. The impact of dose-reduction on post-treatment (3.6 ± 0.1 months) clinical and patient reported outcomes was evaluated in 105 weekly paclitaxel-treated patients.ResultsSignificant neuropathy was present by 6-weeks across patient-reported, clinical, and objective neurophysiological assessments, increasing in prevalence and severity over the treatment course. Limited recovery occurred, with significant neuropathy being maintained up to 12 months (p < .05). Patients who received dose reduction had worse patient reported (FACT-GOG-Ntx: 40.2 ± .1.4) and clinical neuropathy outcomes (TNSc: 4.3 ± 0.4) compared to those who received the full dose (FACT-GOG-Ntx: 45.9 ± 0.9; TNSc: 3.3 ± 0.3, p < .05). Patients who ceased treatment early demonstrated the worse deficits (TNSc: 5.0 ± 0.6; FACT-GOG-Ntx: 37.3 ± 2.7) compared to those who received the complete dose (TNSc: 3.5 ± 0.3; FACT-GOG-Ntx: 45.3 ± 0.9, p < .05).ConclusionWeekly paclitaxel produces symptomatic and objective neuropathy early in the treatment course which can persist. Dose reduction does not necessarily lead to more favorable neuropathy outcomes, with individual risk factors likely important in addition to cumulative dose.Implications for practiceWeekly paclitaxel schedules are extensively used in breast cancer. Patients may develop symptomatic and objective neuropathy early in the treatment course, with these individuals requiring closer monitoring. Furthermore, neuropathy is a long-term sequela that may impact quality of life and require appropriate supportive services. Results suggest that dose reduction does not necessarily lead to better neuropathy outcomes. Understanding schedule-specific toxicity and risk factors for neuropathy will be critical to determining individualized treatment strategies and improving quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Project description:Background Paclitaxel is commonly used as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, with response rates of 21.5–53.7% and significant risk of peripheral neuropathy, there is need for better chemotherapy. Patients and methods This open-label phase II/III trial randomised HER2-negative MBC patients 1:1 to either 6 cycles of three-weekly cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2), or, weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) over 18 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability and quality of life (QoL). Results 158 patients were recruited. Comparing cabazitaxel to paclitaxel, median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.8 months (HR 0.87; 80%CI 0.70–1.08, P = 0.4). There was no difference in median OS (20.6 vs 18.2 months, HR 1.00; 95%CI 0.69–1.45, P = 0.99), ORR (41.8% vs 36.7%) or TTR (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.68–1.75, P = 0.7). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 41.8% on cabazitaxel and 46.8% on paclitaxel; the most common being neutropenia (16.5%) and febrile neutropenia (12.7%) cabazitaxel and neutropenia (8.9%) and lung infection (7.6%) paclitaxel. Peripheral neuropathy of any grade occurred in 54.5% paclitaxel vs 16.5% cabazitaxel. Mean EQ-5D-5L single index utility score (+0.05; 95%CI 0.004–0.09, P = 0.03) and visual analogue scale score (+7.7; 95%CI 3.1–12.3, P = 0.001) were higher in cabazitaxel vs paclitaxel. Conclusions Three-weekly cabazitaxel in HER2-negative MBC does not significantly improve PFS compared to weekly paclitaxel, although it has a lower risk of peripheral neuropathy with better patient reported QoL outcomes. It is well tolerated and requires fewer hospital visits. Graphical abstract Image 1 Highlights • 3 weekly Cabazitaxel does not significantly improve PFS versus weekly paclitaxel.• PFS and OS were similar between 3 weekly Cabazitaxel and weekly Paclitaxel.• Cabazitaxel had better overall patient reported health outcomes.• Cabazitaxel had a lower risk of peripheral neuropathy.• Three weekly Cabazitaxel requires fewer hospital visits than weekly Paclitaxel.