Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To identify patients with ischaemic heart disease by using a practice computer and to estimate the work required to do so.Design
Cross sectional study. Data from the notes and from the computer records of 1680 patients were used to build a database. This was used to compare different methods of identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease.Setting
11 general practices in the Battersea primary care group in south London.Subjects
1 in 40 random sample of patients aged 45 or older.Main outcome measures
Numbers of patients identified with ischaemic heart disease.Results
The combination of the Read code for ischaemic heart disease (G3) and a prescription for a nitrate had a 73% sensitivity and a yield (100/positive predictive value) of one case of ischaemic heart disease for every 1.2 sets of notes reviewed. By searching the records of patients also receiving aspirin, atenolol, digoxin, or a statin, the sensitivity was increased to 96% but the yield fell to one in three.Conclusion
Although commonly used to identify cases, a computer search for G3 code or nitrate missed almost 30% of patients with ischaemic heart disease. A substantially higher percentage of patients can be identified by adding other drugs to the search strategy.
SUBMITTER: Gray J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC27471 | biostudies-literature | 2000 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 20000901 7260
<h4>Objectives</h4>To identify patients with ischaemic heart disease by using a practice computer and to estimate the work required to do so.<h4>Design</h4>Cross sectional study. Data from the notes and from the computer records of 1680 patients were used to build a database. This was used to compare different methods of identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease.<h4>Setting</h4>11 general practices in the Battersea primary care group in south London.<h4>Subjects</h4>1 in 40 random sample ...[more]