Dataset Information

Identifying primary care patients at risk for future diabetes and cardiovascular disease using electronic health records.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Prevention of diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD) is possible but identification of at-risk patients for targeting interventions is a challenge in primary care.

Methods

We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data for 122,715 patients from 12 primary care practices. We defined patients with risk factor clustering using metabolic syndrome (MetS) characteristics defined by NCEP-ATPIII criteria; if missing, we used surrogate characteristics, and validated this approach by directly measuring risk factors in a subset of 154 patients. For subjects with at least 3 of 5 MetS criteria measured at baseline (2003-2004), we defined 3 categories: No MetS (0 criteria); At-risk-for MetS (1-2 criteria); and MetS (>or= 3 criteria). We examined new diabetes and CHD incidence, and resource utilization over the subsequent 3-year period (2005-2007) using age-sex-adjusted regression models to compare outcomes by MetS category.

Results

After excluding patients with diabetes/CHD at baseline, 78,293 patients were eligible for analysis. EHR-defined MetS had 73% sensitivity and 91% specificity for directly measured MetS. Diabetes incidence was 1.4% in No MetS; 4.0% in At-risk-for MetS; and 11.0% in MetS (p < 0.0001 for trend; adjusted OR MetS vs No MetS = 6.86 [6.06-7.76]); CHD incidence was 3.2%, 5.3%, and 6.4% respectively (p < 0.0001 for trend; adjusted OR = 1.42 [1.25-1.62]). Costs and resource utilization increased across categories (p < 0.0001 for trends). Results were similar analyzing individuals with all five criteria not missing, or defining MetS as >or= 2 criteria present.

Conclusion

Risk factor clustering in EHR data identifies primary care patients at increased risk for new diabetes, CHD and higher resource utilization.

SUBMITTER: Hivert MF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2753330 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identifying primary care patients at risk for future diabetes and cardiovascular disease using electronic health records.

Hivert Marie-France MF Grant Richard W RW Shrader Peter P Meigs James B JB

BMC health services research 20090922

<h4>Background</h4>Prevention of diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD) is possible but identification of at-risk patients for targeting interventions is a challenge in primary care.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data for 122,715 patients from 12 primary care practices. We defined patients with risk factor clustering using metabolic syndrome (MetS) characteristics defined by NCEP-ATPIII criteria; if missing, we used surrogate characteristics, and validated this app ...[more]

PMID: 19772639

Similar Datasets

Project description:Patients with schizophrenia have substantial comorbidity contributing to reduced life expectancy of 10-20 years. Identifying which comorbidities might be modifiable could improve rates of premature mortality in this population. We hypothesize that conditions that frequently co-occur but lack shared genetic risk with schizophrenia are more likely to be products of treatment, behavior, or environmental factors and therefore potentially modifiable. To test this hypothesis, we calculated phenome-wide comorbidity from electronic health records (EHR) in 250,000 patients in each of two independent health care institutions (Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Mass General Brigham) and association with schizophrenia polygenic risk scores (PRS) across the same phenotypes (phecodes) in linked biobanks. Comorbidity with schizophrenia was significantly correlated across institutions (r = 0.85) and consistent with prior literature. After multiple test correction, there were 77 significant phecodes comorbid with schizophrenia. Overall, comorbidity and PRS association were highly correlated (r = 0.55, p = 1.29×10-118), however, 36 of the EHR identified comorbidities had significantly equivalent schizophrenia PRS distributions between cases and controls. Fifteen of these lacked any PRS association and were enriched for phenotypes known to be side effects of antipsychotic medications (e.g., "movement disorders", "convulsions", "tachycardia") or other schizophrenia related factors such as from smoking ("bronchitis") or reduced hygiene (e.g., "diseases of the nail") highlighting the validity of this approach. Other phenotypes implicated by this approach where the contribution from shared common genetic risk with schizophrenia was minimal included tobacco use disorder, diabetes, and dementia. This work demonstrates the consistency and robustness of EHR-based schizophrenia comorbidities across independent institutions and with the existing literature. It identifies comorbidities with an absence of shared genetic risk indicating other causes that might be more modifiable and where further study of causal pathways could improve outcomes for patients.

Project description:It is unclear how medication use evolved before diagnosis of dementia (DoD). This study aims to identify varied patterns of polypharmacy before DoD, their prevalence and possible complications. We collected primary care e-health records for 33,451 dementia patients in Wales from 1990 to 2015. The medication uses in every 5-year period along with 20-years prior to dementia diagnosis were considered. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify clusters of medicines for every 5-year period. The prevalence of patients taking three or more medications was 82.16%, 69.7%, 41.1% and 5.5% in the Period 1 (0-5 years before DoD) ~ Period 4 (16-20 years before DoD) respectively. The Period 1 showed 3 clusters of polypharmacy - medicines for respiratory/urinary infections, arthropathies and rheumatism, and cardio-vascular disease (CVD) (66.55%); medicines for infections, arthropathies and rheumatism (AR), cardio-metabolic disease (CMD) and depression (22.02%); and medicines for arthropathies, rheumatism and osteoarthritis (2.6%). The Period 2 showed 4 clusters of polypharmacy - medicines for infections, arthropathies, and CVD (69.7%); medicines for CVD and depression (3%); medicines for CMD and arthropathies (0.3%); and medicines for AR, and CVD (2,5%). The Period 3 showed 6 clusters of polypharmacy - medicines for infections, arthropathies, and CVD (41.1%); medicines for CVD, acute-respiratory-infection (ARI), and arthropathies (1.25%); medicines for AR (1.16%); medicines for depression, anxiety (0.06%); medicines for CMD (1.4%); and medicines for dermatologic disorders (0.9%). The Period 4 showed 3 main clusters of polypharmacy - medicines for infections, arthropathy, and CVD (5.5%); medicines for anxiety, ARI (2.4%); and medicines for ARI and CVD (2.1%). As the development towards dementia progressed, the associative diseases tended to cluster with a larger prevalence in each cluster. Farther away before DoD, the clusters of polypharmacy tended to be clearly distinct between each other, resulting in an increasing number of patterns, but in a smaller prevalence.

Dataset Information

Identifying primary care patients at risk for future diabetes and cardiovascular disease using electronic health records.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Identifying primary care patients at risk for future diabetes and cardiovascular disease using electronic health records.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets