Dataset Information

Toward standardized, comparable public health systems data: a taxonomic description of essential public health work.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To identify taxonomy of task, knowledge, and resources for documenting the work performed in local health departments (LHDs).

Data sources

Secondary data were collected from documents describing public health (PH) practice produced by organizations representing the PH community.

Study design

A multistep consensus-based method was used that included literature review, data extraction, expert opinion, focus group review, and pilot testing.

Data extraction methods

Terms and concepts were manually extracted from documents, consolidated, and evaluated for scope and sufficiency by researchers. An expert panel determined suitability of terms and a hierarchy for classifying them. This work was validated by practitioners and results pilot tested in two LHDs.

Principal findings

The finalized taxonomy was applied to compare a national sample of 11 LHDs. Data were obtained from 1,064 of 1,267 (84 percent) of employees. Frequencies of tasks, knowledge, and resources constitute a profile of PH work. About 70 percent of the correlations between LHD pairs on tasks and knowledge were high (>0.7), suggesting between-department commonalities. On resources only 16 percent of correlations between LHD pairs were high, suggesting a source of performance variability.

Conclusions

A taxonomy of PH work serves as a tool for comparative research and a framework for further development.

SUBMITTER: Merrill J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2758408 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Toward standardized, comparable public health systems data: a taxonomic description of essential public health work.

Merrill Jacqueline J Keeling Jonathan J Gebbie Kristine K

Health services research 20090817 5 Pt 2

<h4>Objective</h4>To identify taxonomy of task, knowledge, and resources for documenting the work performed in local health departments (LHDs).<h4>Data sources</h4>Secondary data were collected from documents describing public health (PH) practice produced by organizations representing the PH community.<h4>Study design</h4>A multistep consensus-based method was used that included literature review, data extraction, expert opinion, focus group review, and pilot testing.<h4>Data extraction methods ...[more]

PMID: 19686248

Similar Datasets

Project description:Increases in incidents involving so-called confused persons have brought attention to the potential costs of recent changes to public mental health (PMH) services in the Netherlands. Decentralized under the (Community) Participation Act (2014), local governments must find resources to compensate for reduced central funding to such services or "innovate." But innovation, even when pressure for change is intense, is difficult. This perspective paper describes experience during and after an investigation into a particularly violent incident and murder. The aim was to provide recommendations to improve the functioning of local PMH services. The investigation concluded that no specific failure by an individual professional or service provider facility led to the murder. Instead, also as a result of the Participation Act that severed communication lines between individuals and organizations, information sharing failures were likely to have reduced system level capacity to identify risks. The methods and analytical frameworks employed to reach this conclusion, also lead to discussion as to the plausibility of an unconventional solution. If improving communication is the primary problem, non-hierarchical information, and organizational networks arise as possible and innovative system solutions. The proposal for debate is that traditional "health system" definitions, literature and narratives, and operating assumptions in public (mental) health are 'locked in' constraining technical and organization innovations. If we view a "health system" as an adaptive system of economic and social "networks," it becomes clear that the current orthodox solution, the so-called integrated health system, typically results in a "centralized hierarchical" or "tree" network. An overlooked alternative that breaks out of the established policy narratives is the view of a 'health systems' as a non-hierarchical organizational structure or 'Open Network.' In turn, this opens new technological and organizational possibilities in seeking policy solutions, and suggests an alternative governance model of huge potential value in public health both locally and globally.

Project description:BackgroundAsthma is among the most common chronic diseases in working-aged populations and occupational exposures are important causal agents. Our aims were to evaluate the best methods to assess occurrence, public health impact, and burden to society related to occupational or work-related asthma and to achieve comparable estimates for different populations.MethodsWe addressed three central questions: 1: What is the best method to assess the occurrence of occupational asthma? We evaluated: 1) assessment of the occurrence of occupational asthma per se, and 2) assessment of adult-onset asthma and the population attributable fractions due to specific occupational exposures. 2: What are the best methods to assess public health impact and burden to society related to occupational or work-related asthma? We evaluated methods based on assessment of excess burden of disease due to specific occupational exposures. 3: How to achieve comparable estimates for different populations? We evaluated comparability of estimates of occurrence and burden attributable to occupational asthma based on different methods.ResultsAssessment of the occurrence of occupational asthma per se can be used in countries with good coverage of the identification system for occupational asthma, i.e. countries with well-functioning occupational health services. Assessment based on adult-onset asthma and population attributable fractions due to specific occupational exposures is a good approach to estimate the occurrence of occupational asthma at the population level. For assessment of public health impact from work-related asthma we recommend assessing excess burden of disease due to specific occupational exposures, including excess incidence of asthma complemented by an assessment of disability from it. International comparability of estimates can be best achieved by methods based on population attributable fractions.ConclusionsPublic health impact assessment for occupational asthma is central in prevention and health policy planning and could be improved by purposeful development of methods for assessing health benefits from preventive actions. Registry-based methods are suitable for evaluating time-trends of occurrence at a given population but for international comparisons they face serious limitations. Assessment of excess burden of disease due to specific occupational exposure is a useful measure, when there is valid information on population exposure and attributable fractions.

Dataset Information

Toward standardized, comparable public health systems data: a taxonomic description of essential public health work.

Objective

Data sources

Study design

Data extraction methods

Principal findings

Conclusions

Publications

Toward standardized, comparable public health systems data: a taxonomic description of essential public health work.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets