Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803.


ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with standard VAC (vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy to that of patients treated with VAC alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide (VAC/VTC).Patients were randomly assigned to 39 weeks of VAC versus VAC/VTC; local therapy began after week 12. Patients with parameningeal RMS with intracranial extension (PME) were treated with VAC and immediate x-ray therapy. The primary study end point was failure-free survival (FFS). The study was designed with 80% power (5% two-sided alpha level) to detect an increase in 5-year FFS from 64% to 75% with VAC/VTC.A total of 617 eligible patients were entered onto the study: 264 were randomly assigned to VAC and 252 to VAC/VTC; 101 PME patients were nonrandomly treated with VAC. Treatment strata were embryonal RMS, stage 2/3, group III (33%); embryonal RMS, group IV, less than age 10 years (7%); alveolar RMS or undifferentiated sarcoma (UDS), stage 1 or group I (17%); alveolar RMS/UDS (27%); and PME (16%). At a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 4-year FFS was 73% with VAC and 68% with VAC/VTC (P = .3). There was no difference in effect of VAC versus VAC/VTC across risk groups. The frequency of second malignancies was similar between the two treatment groups.For intermediate-risk RMS, VAC/VTC does not significantly improve FFS compared with VAC.

SUBMITTER: Arndt CA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2773476 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803.

Arndt Carola A S CA   Stoner Julie A JA   Hawkins Douglas S DS   Rodeberg David A DA   Hayes-Jordan Andrea A AA   Paidas Charles N CN   Parham David M DM   Teot Lisa A LA   Wharam Moody D MD   Breneman John C JC   Donaldson Sarah S SS   Anderson James R JR   Meyer William H WH  

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20090921 31


<h4>Purpose</h4>The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with standard VAC (vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy to that of patients treated with VAC alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide (VAC/VTC).<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Patients were randomly assigned to 39 weeks of VAC versus VAC/VTC; local therapy began after week 12. Patients with parameningeal RMS with intracr  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6145831 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8677904 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8719493 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5070550 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6717036 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3083999 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2953975 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4209105 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2974343 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3866566 | biostudies-literature