Dataset Information

Functional measurements based on feature tracking of cine magnetic resonance images identify left ventricular segments with myocardial scar.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The aim of the study was to perform a feature tracking analysis on cine magnetic resonance (MR) images to elucidate if functional measurements of the motion of the left ventricular wall may detect scar defined with gadolinium enhanced MR.Myocardial contraction can be measured in terms of the velocity, displacement and local deformation (strain) of a particular myocardial segment. Contraction of the myocardial wall will be reduced in the presence of scar and as a consequence of reduced myocardial blood flow.

Methods

Thirty patients (3 women and 27 men) were selected based on the presence or absence of extensive scar in the anteroseptal area of the left ventricle. The patients were investigated in stable clinical condition, 4-8 weeks post ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Seventeen had a scar area >75% in at least one anteroseptal segment (scar) and thirteen had scar area <1% (non-scar). Velocity, displacement and strain were calculated in the longitudinal direction, tangential to the endocardial outline, and in the radial direction, perpendicular to the tangent.

Results

In the scar patients, segments with scar showed lower functional measurements than remote segments. Radial measurements of velocity, displacement and strain performed better in terms of receiver-operator-characteristic curves (ROC) than the corresponding longitudinal measurements. The best area-under-curve was for radial strain, 0.89, where a cut-off value of 38.8% had 80% sensitivity and 86% specificity for the detection of a segment with scar area >50%. As a percentage of the mean, intraobserver variability was 16-14-26% for radial measurements of displacement-velocity-strain and corresponding interobserver variability was 13-12-18%.

Conclusion

Feature tracking analysis of cine-MR displays velocity, displacement and strain in the radial and longitudinal direction and may be used for the detection of transmural scar. The accuracy and repeatability of the radial functional measurements is satisfactory and global measures agree.

SUBMITTER: Maret E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2785780 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Functional measurements based on feature tracking of cine magnetic resonance images identify left ventricular segments with myocardial scar.

Maret Eva E Todt Tim T Brudin Lars L Nylander Eva E Swahn Eva E Ohlsson Jan L JL Engvall Jan E JE

Cardiovascular ultrasound 20091116

<h4>Background</h4>The aim of the study was to perform a feature tracking analysis on cine magnetic resonance (MR) images to elucidate if functional measurements of the motion of the left ventricular wall may detect scar defined with gadolinium enhanced MR.Myocardial contraction can be measured in terms of the velocity, displacement and local deformation (strain) of a particular myocardial segment. Contraction of the myocardial wall will be reduced in the presence of scar and as a consequence of ...[more]

PMID: 19917130

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) strain measurements can be derived using cardiac MRI from routinely acquired balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine images.PurposeTo compare the interfield strength agreement of global systolic strain, peak strain rates and artificial intelligence (AI) landmark-based global longitudinal shortening at 1.5 T and 3 T.Study typeProspective.SubjectsA total of 22 healthy individuals (mean age 36 ± 12 years; 45% male) completed two cardiac MRI scans at 1.5 T and 3 T in a randomized order within 30 minutes. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: bSSFP cine images at 1.5 T and 3 T.AssessmentTwo software packages, Tissue Tracking (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging) and QStrain (Medis Suite, Medis Medical Imaging Systems), were used to derive LV global systolic strain in the longitudinal, circumferential and radial directions and peak (systolic, early diastolic, and late diastolic) strain rates. Global longitudinal shortening and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) were measured using an AI deep neural network model.Statistical testsComparisons between field strengths were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant). Agreement was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsMinimal bias was seen in all strain and strain rate measurements between field strengths. Using Tissue Tracking, strain and strain rate values derived from long-axis images showed poor to fair agreement (ICC range 0.39-0.71), whereas global longitudinal shortening and MAPSE showed good agreement (ICC = 0.81 and 0.80, respectively). Measures derived from short-axis images showed good to excellent agreement (ICC range 0.78-0.91). Similar results for the agreement of strain and strain rate measurements were observed with QStrain.ConclusionThe interfield strength agreement of short-axis derived LV strain and strain rate measurements at 1.5 T and 3 T was better than those derived from long-axis images; however, the agreement of global longitudinal shortening and MAPSE was good.Evidence level2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Project description:BackgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking is increasingly used to quantify cardiac mechanics from cine CMR imaging, although validation against reference standard techniques has been limited. Furthermore, studies have suggested that commonly-derived metrics, such as peak global strain (reported in 63% of feature tracking studies), can be quantified using contours from just two frames - end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) - without requiring tracking software. We hypothesized that mechanics derived from feature tracking would not agree with those derived from a reference standard (displacement-encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) imaging), and that peak strain from feature tracking would agree with that derived using simple processing of only ED and ES contours.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 88 participants with 186 pairs of DENSE and balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) image slices acquired at the same locations across two institutions. Left ventricular (LV) strains, torsion, and dyssynchrony were quantified from both feature tracking (TomTec Imaging Systems, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging) and DENSE. Contour-based strains from bSSFP images were derived from ED and ES contours. Agreement was assessed with Bland-Altman analyses and coefficients of variation (CoV). All biases are reported in absolute percentage.ResultsComparison results were similar for both vendor packages (TomTec and Circle), and thus only TomTec Imaging System data are reported in the abstract for simplicity. Compared to DENSE, mid-ventricular circumferential strain (Ecc) from feature tracking had acceptable agreement (bias: -?0.4%, p =?0.36, CoV: 11%). However, feature tracking significantly overestimated the magnitude of Ecc at the base (bias: -?4.0% absolute, p <?0.001, CoV: 18%) and apex (bias: -?2.4% absolute, p =?0.01, CoV: 15%), underestimated torsion (bias: -?1.4 deg/cm, p <?0.001, CoV: 41%), and overestimated dyssynchrony (bias: 26 ms, p <?0.001, CoV: 76%). Longitudinal strain (Ell) had borderline-acceptable agreement (bias: -?0.2%, p =?0.77, CoV: 19%). Contour-based strains had excellent agreement with feature tracking (biases: -?1.3-0.2%, CoVs: 3-7%).ConclusionCompared to DENSE as a reference standard, feature tracking was inaccurate for quantification of apical and basal LV circumferential strains, longitudinal strain, torsion, and dyssynchrony. Feature tracking was only accurate for quantification of mid LV circumferential strain. Moreover, feature tracking is unnecessary for quantification of whole-slice strains (e.g. base, apex), since simplified processing of only ED and ES contours yields very similar results to those derived from feature tracking. Current feature tracking technology therefore has limited utility for quantification of cardiac mechanics.

Project description:Purpose To evaluate myocardial strain and circumferential transmural strain difference (cTSD; the difference between epicardial and endocardial circumferential strain) in a genotyped cohort with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and to explore correlations between cTSD and other anatomic and functional markers of disease status. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may indicate early disease in preclinical HCM (sarcomere mutation carriers without LV hypertrophy). Cardiac MRI feature tracking may be used to evaluate myocardial strain in carriers of HCM sarcomere mutation. Materials and Methods Participants with HCM and their family members participated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (HCMNet). Genetic testing was performed in all participants. Study participants underwent cardiac MRI with temporal resolution at 40 msec or less. LV myocardial strain was analyzed by using feature-tracking software. Circumferential strain was measured at the epicardial and endocardial surfaces; their difference yielded the circumferential transmural strain difference (cTSD). Multivariable analysis to predict HCM status was performed by using multinomial logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, and LV parameters. Results Ninety-nine participants were evaluated (23 control participants, 34 participants with preclinical HCM [positive for sarcomere mutation and negative for LV hypertrophy], and 42 participants with overt HCM [positive for sarcomere mutation and negative for LV hypertrophy]). The average age was 25 years ± 11 and 44 participants (44%) were women. Maximal LV wall thickness was 9.5 mm ± 1.4, 9.8 mm ± 2.2, and 16.1 mm ± 5.3 in control participants, participants with preclinical HCM (P = .496 vs control participants), and participants with overt HCM (P < .001 vs control participants), respectively. cTSD for control participants, preclinical HCM, and overt HCM was 14% ± 4, 17% ± 4, and 22% ± 7, respectively (P < .01 for all comparisons). In multivariable models (controlling for septal thickness and log-transformed N-terminal brain-type natriuretic peptide), cTSD was predictive of preclinical and overt HCM disease status (P < .01). Conclusion Cardiac MRI feature tracking identifies myocardial dysfunction not only in participants with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but also in carriers of sarcomere mutation without left ventricular hypertrophy, suggesting that contractile abnormalities are present even when left ventricular wall thickness is normal. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:AIMS:A multitude of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) techniques are used for myocardial strain assessment; however, studies comparing them are limited. We sought to compare global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), segmental longitudinal (SLS), and segmental circumferential (SCS) strain values, as well as reproducibility between CMR feature tracking (FT), tagging (TAG), and fast-strain-encoded (fast-SENC) CMR techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS:Eighteen subjects (11 healthy volunteers and seven patients with heart failure) underwent two CMR scans (1.5T, Philips) with identical parameters. Global and segmental strain values were measured using FT (Medis), TAG (Medviso), and fast-SENC (Myocardial Solutions). Friedman's test, linear regression, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess differences and correlation in measured GLS and GCS between the techniques. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variance (COV), and Bland-Altman analysis were used for reproducibility assessment. All techniques correlated closely for GLS (Pearson's r: 0.86-0.92) and GCS (Pearson's r: 0.85-0.94). Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility was excellent in all techniques for both GLS (ICC 0.92-0.99, CoV 2.6-10.1%) and GCS (ICC 0.89-0.99, CoV 4.3-10.1%). Inter-study reproducibility was similar for all techniques for GLS (ICC 0.91-0.96, CoV 9.1-10.8%) and GCS (ICC 0.95-0.97, CoV 7.6-10.4%). Combined segmental intra-observer reproducibility was good in all techniques for SLS (ICC 0.914-0.953, CoV 12.35-24.73%) and SCS (ICC 0.885-0.978, CoV 10.76-19.66%). Combined inter-study SLS reproducibility was the worst in FT (ICC 0.329, CoV 42.99%), while fast-SENC performed the best (ICC 0.844, CoV 21.92%). TAG had the best reproducibility for combined inter-study SCS (ICC 0.902, CoV 19.08%), while FT performed the worst (ICC 0.766, CoV 32.35%). Bland-Altman analysis revealed considerable inter-technique biases for GLS (FT vs. fast-SENC 3.71%; FT vs. TAG 8.35%; and TAG vs. fast-SENC 4.54%) and GCS (FT vs. fast-SENC 2.15%; FT vs. TAG 6.92%; and TAG vs. fast-SENC 2.15%). Limits of agreement for GLS ranged from ±3.1 (TAG vs. fast-SENC) to ±4.85 (FT vs. TAG) for GLS and ±2.98 (TAG vs. fast-SENC) to ±5.85 (FT vs. TAG) for GCS. CONCLUSIONS:We found significant differences in measured GLS and GCS between FT, TAG, and fast-SENC. Global strain reproducibility was excellent for all techniques. Acquisition-based techniques had better reproducibility than FT for segmental strain.

Dataset Information

Functional measurements based on feature tracking of cine magnetic resonance images identify left ventricular segments with myocardial scar.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Functional measurements based on feature tracking of cine magnetic resonance images identify left ventricular segments with myocardial scar.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets