Dataset Information

Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cancer screening programmes in England are publicly-funded. Professionals' beliefs in the public health benefits of screening can conflict with individuals' entitlements to exercise informed judgement over whether or not to participate. The recognition of the importance of individual autonomy in decision making requires greater understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs upon which people's screening choices are founded. Until recently, the technology available required that cancer screening be confined to women. This study aimed to discover whether male and female perceptions of cancer and of screening differed.

Methods

Data on the public's cancer beliefs were collected by means of a postal survey (anonymous questionnaire). Two general practices based in Nottingham and in Mansfield, in east-central England, sent questionnaires to registered patients aged 30 to 70 years. 1,808 completed questionnaires were returned for analysis, 56.5 per cent from women.

Results

Women were less likely to underestimate overall cancer incidence, although each sex was more likely to cite a sex-specific cancer as being amongst the most common cancer site. In terms of risk factors, men were most uncertain about the role of stress and sexually-transmitted diseases, whereas women were more likely to rate excessive alcohol and family history as major risk factors. The majority of respondents believed the public health care system should provide cancer screening, but significantly more women than men reported having benefiting from the nationally-provided screening services. Those who were older, in better health or had longer periods of formal education were less worried about cancer than those who had illness experiences, lower incomes, or who were smokers. Actual or potential participation in bowel screening was higher amongst those who believed bowel cancer to be common and amongst men, despite women having more substantial worries about cancer than men.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that men's and women's differential knowledge of cancer correlates with women's closer involvement with screening. Even so, men were neither less positive about screening nor less likely to express a willingness to participate in relevant screening in the future. It is important to understand gender-related differences in knowledge and perceptions of cancer, if health promotion resources are to be allocated efficiently.

SUBMITTER: Sach TH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2789733 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.

Sach Tracey H TH Whynes David K DK

BMC public health 20091124

<h4>Background</h4>Cancer screening programmes in England are publicly-funded. Professionals' beliefs in the public health benefits of screening can conflict with individuals' entitlements to exercise informed judgement over whether or not to participate. The recognition of the importance of individual autonomy in decision making requires greater understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs upon which people's screening choices are founded. Until recently, the technology available requi ...[more]

PMID: 19930703

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHealth disparities in prostate cancer (PC) are thought to reflect the complex interplay of socioeconomics, environment and biology. The potential impact of beliefs and perceptions about PC among Black and Latino populations on clinical disparities are not well understood. This qualitative study was conducted to assess current prevalent and pervasive stigma, beliefs and perceptions regarding PC among Blacks and Latinos living in a large metropolitan area, thereby identifying potentially modifiable barriers to care.MethodsQualitative data were collected through four separate focus groups of self-identified Black and Latino adult men and women living in Philadelphia to better understand their perceptions of PC diagnosis, screening and treatment. Each focus group was single-sex and conducted by racial/ethnic group in order to assess possible differences in beliefs about PC based on gender and racial/ethnic affiliation. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim by trained research assistants and qualitative data analysis was conducted using modified grounded theory.ResultsThere were a total of 34 participants: 19 Hispanics/Latinos and 15 Blacks, with equal numbers of men and women (n=17). Median age was 57 years (range: 18 to 85 years). Dominant themes that emerged with respect to PC diagnosis included the stigma surrounding this condition and the perceived role of an "unhealthy lifestyle" and certain sexual behaviors as risk factors for PC development. While the majority of participants acknowledged the importance of PC screening and early detection, discussion centered around the barriers to both the interest in seeking medical care and the likelihood of securing it. These barriers included misunderstanding of PC etiology, distrust of the medical profession, and financial/access limitations. Men expressed substantial confusion about PC screening guidelines. In the Black female group, the role of faith and religion in the course of disease was a major theme. Both Black and Latina females discussed the role of fear and avoidance around PC screening and treatment, as well as the prevalence of misinformation about PC in their familial and social communities.ConclusionBlack and Latino focus groups revealed the existence of cultural beliefs, misunderstandings and fears pertaining to PC which could influence health-related behaviors. Some themes were common across groups; others suggested racial and gender predilections. Future targeted efforts focused on directly addressing prevalent misperceptions among underserved communities in urban settings could help to improve health literacy and equity in PC outcomes in these populations.

Project description:Background/AimsSince 1993, the US Preventive Services Task Force has recommended screening to prevent colorectal cancer among average risk adults, beginning at age 50. Many studies over the past 20 years evaluated factors associated with screening uptake; however, few have focused on individuals who are newly eligible (i.e., those turning 50 years). We evaluated patient characteristics associated with uptake and time to initiation of colorectal cancer tests in a population newly-eligible for screening.MethodsThe study included 128,358 individuals who were members of an integrated care delivery system (Group Health) and enrolled on their 50th birthday from 1996–2011. We assessed receipt of colorectal cancer tests within 5 years of eligibility, and calculated the median time to first test. We examined patient characteristics associated with use of colorectal cancer tests overall using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsStool-based tests were most commonly used, with uptake ranging from 35–40% of the cohort across the study period. The proportion of individuals initiating colorectal cancer testing via colonoscopy increased from 3% in members becoming eligible in 1996–1998 to 21% in 2005–2007. Time to first test varied across test types. Median time to the first test was 3 months shorter in members who chose stool-based tests (25.2 months) compared to those who chose colonoscopy (28.2 months) among members newly eligible in 2005–2007. However, we observed no temporal changes in median time to first test, conditional on test type. Characteristics associated with increased uptake included more recent enrollment at age 50 (e.g., 2008–2010:HR = 2.16, 95% CI 2.09–2.23) and Asian background (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.05–1.11). Factors associated with reduced uptake included being a woman (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.94), African-American (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91–0.99) or Pacific Islander (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.76–0.96), diagnosed with diabetes (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.85–0.91) and being moderately or severely obese (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.81–0.85 and HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.73–0.77, respectively).ConclusionsPatient characteristics associated with initiation of colorectal cancer testing in a newly eligible population are similar to previous findings among all-age eligible adults. Further, while the time to the first test remained stable, there was an increase in colorectal cancer testing during the study period.

Project description:BACKGROUND:In Nicaragua, cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death for women ages 15-44, yet access to the HPV vaccine is limited to those with financial resources to pay for it. Cervical cytology is provided free of charge in public clinics; however, only 10% of women receive Pap smears at the nationally recommended frequency. Previous studies have not investigated how beliefs regarding cervical cancer screening may differ for urban and rural populations in Nicaragua. Furthermore, no investigation has assessed Nicaraguan women's beliefs about a potential HPV immunization campaign. Given beliefs' influence on health behavior, we investigated the structural, sociocultural, and knowledge-based factors influencing women's beliefs regarding cervical cancer screening among urban and rural women in León, Nicaragua, and assessed acceptance of a potential HPV immunization program. METHODS:Our sequential explanatory mixed-methods study consisted of two phases: (1) a close-ended questionnaire, followed by (2) a qualitative, in-depth interview. Our quantitative sample contained 117 urban and 112 rural participants aged 18-49. We assessed beliefs regarding cervical cancer screening using a 22-item scale, with higher scores indicating screening-promoting beliefs in simple linear and multiple linear regressions. Twenty qualitative interviews, exploring the sociocultural dimensions of knowledge and attitudes indicated by our quantitative findings, were conducted with a sample of 13 urban and 7 rural women aged 19-46. RESULTS:The multiple linear regression indicates that greater knowledge of Pap smears, HPV, and cervical cancer is significantly associated with screening-promoting beliefs after adjusting for other relevant factors. There was no significant difference in screening knowledge and beliefs for urban and rural women. Four recurrent themes representing determinants of knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes regarding cervical cancer screening arose from interviews and built on quantitative findings: (1) women's embarrassment due to the intimate nature of the Pap smear and male gender of exam provider discourages screening; (2) women believe Pap smears and cervical cancer are associated with sexual promiscuity, and this association stigmatizes women with the disease; (3) knowledge of cervical cancer prevention is limited to those who regularly attend health centers; and (4) women find screening inconvenient, believing understaffed clinics increase patient wait time, limit time patients spend with clinicians, and delay Pap results. A fifth theme indicates (5) participants' acceptance of a potential HPV immunization program. DISCUSSION:Future interventions should focus on increasing access to information about cervical cancer prevention for women who do not regularly attend health centers. Furthermore, our results suggest that if funding were allocated to make the HPV vaccine accessible in Nicaragua, it would be well received.

Dataset Information

Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets