Dataset Information

What lies behind serum urate concentration? Insights from genetic and genomic studies.

ABSTRACT: Many factors, including genetic components and acquired factors such as obesity and alcohol consumption, influence serum uric acid (urate) concentrations. Since serum urate concentrations are determined by the balance between renal urate excretion and the volume of urate produced via purine metabolism, urate transporter genes as well as genes coding for enzymes involved in purine metabolism affect serum urate concentrations. URAT1 was the first transporter affecting serum urate concentrations to be identified. Using the characterization of this transporter as an indicator, several transporters have been shown to transport urate, allowing the construction of a synoptic renal urate transport model. Notable re-absorptive urate transporters are URAT1 at apical membranes and GLUT9 at basolateral membranes, while ABCG2, MRP4 (multidrug resistance protein 4) and NPT1 are secretive transporters at apical membranes. Recent genome-wide association studies have led to validation of the in vitro model constructed from each functional analysis of urate transporters, and identification of novel candidate genes related to urate metabolism and transport proteins, such as glucokinase regulatory protein (GKRP), PDZK1 and MCT9. However, the function and physiologic roles of several candidates, as well as the influence of acquired factors such as obesity, foods, or alcoholic beverages, remain unclear.

SUBMITTER: Ichida K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2808734 | biostudies-literature | 2009

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

What lies behind serum urate concentration? Insights from genetic and genomic studies.

Ichida Kimiyoshi K

Genome medicine 20091229 12

Many factors, including genetic components and acquired factors such as obesity and alcohol consumption, influence serum uric acid (urate) concentrations. Since serum urate concentrations are determined by the balance between renal urate excretion and the volume of urate produced via purine metabolism, urate transporter genes as well as genes coding for enzymes involved in purine metabolism affect serum urate concentrations. URAT1 was the first transporter affecting serum urate concentrations to ...[more]

PMID: 20090896

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo investigate the causal associations of serum urate (SUA) with stroke risk and prognosis using Mendelian randomization (MR) and the potential mediating role of stroke risk factors in the causal pathways.MethodsWe used the random-effects inverse variance weighting (IVW) as our primary method. We initially performed two-sample univariable MR (UVMR) to identify the causal associations of SUA (n = 437,354) with any stroke (AS, FinnGen: n = 311,635; MEGASTROKE: n = 446,696), ischemic stroke (IS, FinnGen: n = 212,774; MEGASTROKE: n = 440,328), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, FinnGen: n = 343,663; ISGC: n = 3,026), functional outcome after ischemic stroke at 90d (n = 4,363), and motor recovery within 24 months after stroke (n = 488), and then multivariable MR (MVMR) to estimate the direct causal effects of SUA on these outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders. Finally, we further conducted a two-step MR to investigate the potential mediating role of body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the identified causal pathways.ResultsGenetically predicted elevated SUA levels were significantly associated with increased risk of AS (meta-analysis: OR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.04-1.13], p = 3.69e-05) and IS (meta-analysis: OR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.01-1.19], p = 0.021) and with improved poor functional outcome after ischemic stroke at 90d (OR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.72-0.90], p = 1.79e-04) and motor recovery within 24 months after stroke (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.23-1.64], p = 2.15e-06). In MVMR, SBP and DBP significantly attenuated the causal effects of SUA on AS, IS, and functional outcome after ischemic stroke at 90d and motor recovery within 24 months after stroke. Further mediation analyses showed that SBP mediated 52.4 and 34.5% of the effects of SUA on AS and IS, while DBP mediated 28.5 and 23.4% of the causal effects, respectively.ConclusionThis study supports the dual role of genetically predicted SUA in increasing stroke risk, especially ischemic stroke risk, and in improving functional outcome and motor recovery. SBP and DBP are key mediators lying on the causal pathways of SUA with AS and IS.

Dataset Information

What lies behind serum urate concentration? Insights from genetic and genomic studies.

Publications

What lies behind serum urate concentration? Insights from genetic and genomic studies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets