Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To determine the effect of using Euclidean measurements and zip-code centroid geo-imputation versus more precise spatial analytical techniques in health care research.Data sources
Commercially insured members from a southeastern managed care organization.Study design
Distance from admitting inpatient facility to member's home and zip-code centroid (geographic placement) was compared using Euclidean straight-line and shortest-path drive distances (measurement technique).Data collection
Administrative claims from October 2005 to September 2006.Principal findings
Measurement technique had a greater impact on distance values compared with geographic placement. Drive distance from the geocoded address was highly correlated (r=0.99) with the Euclidean distance from the zip-code centroid.Conclusions
Actual differences were relatively small. Researchers without capabilities to produce drive distance measurements and/or address geocoding techniques could rely on simple linear regressions to estimate correction factors with a high degree of confidence.
SUBMITTER: Jones SG
PROVIDER: S-EPMC2813451 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Jones Stephen G SG Ashby Avery J AJ Momin Soyal R SR Naidoo Allen A
Health services research 20090924 1
<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the effect of using Euclidean measurements and zip-code centroid geo-imputation versus more precise spatial analytical techniques in health care research.<h4>Data sources</h4>Commercially insured members from a southeastern managed care organization.<h4>Study design</h4>Distance from admitting inpatient facility to member's home and zip-code centroid (geographic placement) was compared using Euclidean straight-line and shortest-path drive distances (measurement tec ...[more]