Dataset Information

Development of a quality-of-life questionnaire for adults with strabismus.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We report the development of a patient-derived, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire for adults with strabismus.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Participants

Twenty-nine patients with strabismus in a first phase, and 32 patients with strabismus, 18 patients with other eye diseases, and 13 visually normal adults in a second phase.

Methods

Individual patient interviews generated 181 questionnaire items. For item reduction, we asked 29 patients with strabismus to complete the 181-item questionnaire, analyzed responses, and performed factor analysis. Two prominent factors were identified, and the 10 items with the highest correlation with each factor were selected. The final 20-item questionnaire (10 psychosocial items and 10 function items) was administered to an additional 32 patients with strabismus (22 with diplopia, 10 without diplopia), 13 visually normal adults, and 18 patients with other eye diseases. A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for responses (never = 100, rarely = 75, sometimes = 50, often = 25, and always = 0). Median overall questionnaire scores and psychosocial and function subscale scores, ranging from 0 (worst HRQOL) to 100 (best HRQOL), were compared across groups.

Main outcome measures

The HRQOL questionnaire response scores.

Results

Median overall scores were statistically significantly lower (worse quality of life) for patients with strabismus (56) compared with visually normal adults (95; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (86; P<0.001). Median scores on the psychosocial subscale were significantly lower for strabismus patients (69) compared with visually normal adults (99; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (94; P<0.001). For the function subscale, median scores were again significantly lower for strabismus patients (43) compared with visually normal adults (91; P<0.001) and patients with other eye diseases (78; P<0.001).

Conclusions

We have developed a 20-item, patient-derived, HRQOL questionnaire specific for adults with strabismus, with subscales to assess psychosocial and function concerns. This 20-item, condition-specific questionnaire will be useful for assessing HRQOL in individual strabismus patients and also as an outcome measure for clinical trials.

Financial disclosure(s)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

SUBMITTER: Hatt SR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2817952 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development of a quality-of-life questionnaire for adults with strabismus.

Hatt Sarah R SR Leske David A DA Bradley Elizabeth A EA Cole Stephen R SR Holmes Jonathan M JM

Ophthalmology 20081118 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>We report the development of a patient-derived, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire for adults with strabismus.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-sectional study.<h4>Participants</h4>Twenty-nine patients with strabismus in a first phase, and 32 patients with strabismus, 18 patients with other eye diseases, and 13 visually normal adults in a second phase.<h4>Methods</h4>Individual patient interviews generated 181 questionnaire items. For item reduction, we asked 29 patients wit ...[more]

PMID: 19019449

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20)- a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in adults with strabismus, and if flawed, to revise the AS-20 and its subscales creating valid measurement scales.Methods584 adults (meanage, 27.5 years) with strabismus were recruited from an outpatient clinic at a South Indian tertiary eye care centre and were administered the AS-20 questionnaire.The AS-20 was translated and back translated into two Indian languages. The AS-20 and its two 10-item subscales - 'psychosocial' and 'function'were assessed separately for fit to the Rasch model, including an assessment of the rating scale, unidimensionality (by principal components analysis), measurement precision by person separation reliability, PSR, targeting, and differential item functioning (DIF; notable > 1.0 logits).ResultsResponse categories were not used as intended, thereby, required re-organization and reducing their number from 5 to 3. The AS-20 had adequate measurement precision (PSR = 0.87) but lacked unidimensionality; however, deletion of the six multi-dimensionality causing items and an additional three misfitting items resulted in 11-item unidimensional questionnaire (AS-11). Two items failed to satisfy the model expectations in the 'psychosocial' subscale and were deleted - resulting in an 8-item unidimensional scale with adequate PSR (0.81) and targeting (0.23 logits). One item misfit in the 'function' subscale and was deleted-resulting in a 9 item Rasch-revised unidimensional subscale with acceptable PSR (0.80) and targeting (0.97 logits).None of the items displayed notable DIF by age, gender and level of education.ConclusionsThe AS-11 and its two Rasch-revised subscales - 8-item psychosocial and 9-item function subscale may be more appropriate than the original AS-20 and its two 10-item subscales for use as unidimensional measures of HRQoL in adults with strabismus in India. Further work is required to establish the validity of the revised rating scale.

Project description:The Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS-20) and the Amblyopia & Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) both measure health-related quality of life in strabismus patients. We evaluated to what extent these instruments cover similar domains by identifying the underlying quality-of-life factors of the combined questionnaires.Participants were adults from a historic cohort with available orthoptic childhood data documenting strabismus and/or amblyopia. They had previously completed the A&SQ and were now asked to complete the AS-20. Factor analysis was performed on the correlation-matrix of the combined AS-20 and A&SQ data to identify common underlying factors. The identified factors were correlated with the clinical variables of angle of strabismus, degree of binocular vision, and visual acuity of the worse eye.One hundred ten patients completed both questionnaires (mean age, 44 years; range, 38-51 years). Six factors were found that together explained 78% of the total variance. The factor structure was dominated by the first four factors. One factor contained psychosocial and social-contact items, and another factor depth-perception items from both questionnaires. A third factor contained seven items-only from the AS-20-on eye strain, stress, and difficulties with reading and with concentrating. A fourth factor contained seven items-only from the A&SQ-on fear of losing the better eye and visual disorientation, specific for amblyopia. Current visual acuity of the worse eye correlated with depth-perception items and vision-related items, whereas current binocular vision correlated with psychosocial and social-contact items, in 93 patients.Factor analysis suggests that the AS-20 and A&SQ measure a similar psychosocial quality-of-life domain. However, functional problems like avoidance of reading, difficulty in concentrating, eye stress, reading problems, inability to enjoy hobbies, and need for frequent breaks when reading are represented only in the AS-20. During the development of the A&SQ, asthenopia items were considered insufficiently specific for strabismus and were excluded a priori. The patients who generated the items for the AS-20 had, in majority, adulthood-onset strabismus and diplopia and were, hence, more likely to develop such complaints than our adult patients with childhood-onset strabismus and/or amblyopia.

Dataset Information

Development of a quality-of-life questionnaire for adults with strabismus.

Purpose

Design

Participants

Methods

Main outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Financial disclosure(s)

Publications

Development of a quality-of-life questionnaire for adults with strabismus.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets