Dataset Information

Phase I trial of autologous hematopoietic SCT with escalating doses of topotecan combined with CY and carboplatin in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: We designed a phase I clinical trial of escalating doses of topotecan with CY and carboplatin in combination with autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT) for the treatment of relapsed or persistent platinum sensitive ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. After stem cell collection, 16 patients received topotecan at 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 or 6.0 mg/m(2)/d combined with CY 1.5 g/m(2)/d and carboplatin 200 mg/m(2)/d, all by 4-day continuous infusion. Steady state pharmacokinetics of topotecan and carboplatin were examined. Pre-treatment biopsies were examined for the expression of topoisomerase (topo) I, Ki67 and Bcl-2 family members by immunohistochemistry. One of six patients at a topotecan dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/d and two of three patients at 6.0 mg/m(2)/d had dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis lasting >2 weeks. There was no treatment-related mortality. As topotecan clearance was constant over the dose range examined, topotecan steady state plasma concentrations increased with dose. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.5 months and 2.7 years, respectively. Shorter progression-free survival was observed in tumors with low topo expression (P=0.04). Topotecan can safely be dose escalated to 4.5 mg/m(2)/d in combination with CY, carboplatin and AHSCT. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00652691.

SUBMITTER: Litzow MR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2836387 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Phase I trial of autologous hematopoietic SCT with escalating doses of topotecan combined with CY and carboplatin in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Litzow M R MR Peethambaram P P PP Safgren S L SL Keeney G L GL Ansell S M SM Dispenzieri A A Elliott M A MA Gastineau D A DA Gertz M A MA Inwards D J DJ Lacy M Q MQ Micallef I N M IN Porrata L F LF Lingle W L WL Hartmann L C LC Frost M H MH Barrette B A BA Long H J HJ Suman V J VJ Reid J M JM Ames M M MM Kaufmann S H SH

Bone marrow transplantation 20090803 3

We designed a phase I clinical trial of escalating doses of topotecan with CY and carboplatin in combination with autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT) for the treatment of relapsed or persistent platinum sensitive ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. After stem cell collection, 16 patients received topotecan at 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 or 6.0 mg/m(2)/d combined with CY 1.5 g/m(2)/d and carboplatin 200 mg/m(2)/d, all by 4-day continuous infusion. Steady state pharmacokinetics of topotecan and carbo ...[more]

PMID: 19648970

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of orally delivered cannabis oils predominant in cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or both CBD and THC in healthy cats.MethodsIn this placebo-controlled, blinded study, 20 healthy adult cats were randomized to one of five treatment groups (n = 4 per group): two placebo groups (sunflower oil [SF] or medium-chain triglyceride oil [MCT]), or three plant-derived cannabinoid oil groups (CBD in MCT, THC in MCT or CBD/THC [1.5:1] in SF). Up to 11 escalating doses of each formulation were delivered orally via syringe to fasted subjects, with at least 3 days separating doses. Safety and tolerability were determined from clinical observations, complete blood counts (CBCs) and clinical chemistry. Plasma cannabinoids (CBD, THC) and metabolites (7-COOH-CBD, 11-OH-THC) were assessed.ResultsTitration to maximum doses of 30.5 mg/kg CBD (CBD oil), 41.5 mg/kg THC (THC oil) or 13.0:8.4 mg/kg CBD:THC (CBD/THC oil) was safely achieved in all subjects. All observed adverse events (AEs) were mild, transient and resolved without medical intervention. Gastrointestinal AEs were more common with formulations containing MCT. Constitutional (lethargy, hypothermia), neurologic (ataxia) and ocular (protrusion membrana nictitans) AEs were more common with oils containing THC (CBD/THC and THC oils). There were no clinically significant changes in CBC or clinical chemistry across treatment groups. Higher plasma levels of the cannabinoids and their metabolites following administration of the CBD/THC combination product are suggestive of a pharmacokinetic interaction.Conclusions and relevanceThis is the first feline study to explore the safety and tolerability of CBD and THC, alone and in combination, in a controlled research setting. These findings will inform veterinarians of the safety profile of cannabinoids, particularly when considering the potential therapeutic use of CBD in cats or recognizing clinical signs associated with accidental exposure to THC-containing products.

Project description:BackgroundTo undertake a systematic review of the available data for oral and intravenous topotecan in adults with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) for whom re-treatment with the first line regimen is not considered appropriate.MethodsWe searched six databases from 1980 up to March 2009 for relevant trials regardless of language or publication status. Relevant studies included any randomised trial of any chemotherapeutic treatment against any comparator in this licensed indication. Where possible we used opposite quantitative methods. Where meta-analysis was considered unsuitable for some or all of the data, we employed a narrative synthesis method. For indirect comparisons we used the method of Bucher et al., where available data allowed it, otherwise we used narrative descriptions.ResultsSeven unique studies met the inclusion criteria, four of which could be used in our analyses. These included one study comparing oral topotecan plus best supportive care (BSC) to BSC alone, one study comparing intravenous topotecan to cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and vincristine (CAV), and two studies comparing oral topotecan with intravenous topotecan. All four studies appear to be well conducted and with low risk of bias. Oral topotecan plus BSC has advantages over BSC alone in terms of survival (hazard ratio = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87) and quality of life (EQ-5 D difference: 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.25). Intravenous topotecan was at least as effective as CAV in the treatment of patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer and resulted in improved quality-of-life with respect to several symptoms. CAV was associated with significantly less grade 4 thrombocytopenia compared with IV topotecan (risk ratio = 5.83; 95% CI, 2.35 to 14.42). Survival (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.25) and response (pooled risk ratio = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.85) data were similar for the oral and IV topotecan groups. Symptom control was also very similar between the trials and between the oral and IV groups. Toxicity data showed a significant difference in favour of oral topotecan for neutropenia (pooled risk ratio = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89). Indirect evidence showed that oral topotecan was at least as good as or better than CAV on all outcomes (survival, response rates, toxicities, and symptoms) that allowed indirect comparisons, with the only exception being grade four thrombocytopenia which occurred less often on CAV treatment.ConclusionsConcerning topotecan both the oral and intravenous options have similar efficacy, and patient preference may be a decisive factor if the choice would be between the two formulations. The best trial evidence for decision making, because it was tested versus best supportive care, exists for oral topotecan. Indirectly, because we have two head-to-head comparisons of oral versus intravenous topotecan, and one comparison of intravenous topotecan versus CAV in similar patients as in the trial against best supportive care, one might infer that IV topotecan and CAV could also be superior to best supportive care, and that oral topotecan has similar effects to CAV with possibly better symptom control. From the evidence discussed above, it is evident that oral topotecan has similar efficacy to IV topotecan (direct comparison) and CAV (indirect comparison). There is no further evidence base of direct or possible indirect comparisons for other comparators than CAV of either oral or IV topotecan.

Dataset Information

Phase I trial of autologous hematopoietic SCT with escalating doses of topotecan combined with CY and carboplatin in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Publications

Phase I trial of autologous hematopoietic SCT with escalating doses of topotecan combined with CY and carboplatin in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets