Dataset Information

Dynamic cardiovascular risk assessment in elderly people. The role of repeated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

This study sought to determine whether serial measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in community-dwelling elderly people would provide additional prognostic information to that from traditional risk factors.

Background

Accurate cardiovascular risk stratification is challenging in elderly people.

Methods

NT-proBNP was measured at baseline and 2 to 3 years later in 2,975 community-dwelling older adults free of heart failure in the longitudinal CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). This investigation examined the risk of new-onset heart failure (HF) and death from cardiovascular causes associated with baseline NT-proBNP and changes in NT-proBNP levels, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

NT-proBNP levels in the highest quintile (>267.7 pg/ml) were independently associated with greater risks of HF (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46 to 3.78) and cardiovascular death (HR: 3.02; 95% CI: 2.36 to 3.86) compared with the lowest quintile (<47.5 pg/ml). The inflection point for elevated risk occurred at NT-proBNP 190 pg/ml. Among participants with initially low NT-proBNP (<190 pg/ml), those who developed a >25% increase on follow-up to >190 pg/ml (21%) were at greater adjusted risk of HF (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.68 to 2.71) and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.43 to 2.53) compared with those with sustained low levels. Among participants with initially high NT-proBNP, those who developed a >25% increase (40%) were at higher risk of HF (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.56 to 2.72) and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.57), whereas those who developed a >25% decrease to ConclusionsNT-proBNP levels independently predict heart failure and cardiovascular death in older adults. NT-proBNP levels frequently change over time, and these fluctuations reflect dynamic changes in cardiovascular risk.

SUBMITTER: deFilippi CR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2840257 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceSex-specific differences in the commonly used cardiac biomarkers high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are apparent. There is an absence of medical literature delineating the concentration differences for these biomarkers in transgender individuals without cardiac disease.ObjectiveTo determine the distribution of hs-cTn and NT-proBNP in healthy transgender people.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cross-sectional prospective study, healthy transgender individuals prescribed testosterone or estradiol for 12 months or more were recruited from internal medicine and primary care clinics that specialize in transgender medical care between November 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018.ExposuresTestosterone or estradiol for 12 months.Main outcomes and measuresConcentrations for hs-cTnI (troponin I), hs-cTnT (troponin T), and NT-proBNP were measured.ResultsTransgender people prescribed testosterone (n = 79; mean [SD] age, 28.8 [7.8] years) or estrogen (n = 93; mean [SD] age, 35.1 [11.7] years) were recruited. The concentration of hs-cTn was significantly higher in transgender men relative to transgender women. For Abbott hs-cTnI levels, the median (IQR) concentration observed in transgender men and women was 0.9 (0.6-1.7) ng/L and 0.6 (0.3-1.0) ng/L, respectively. Results were similar across 2 additional hs-cTn assays. In contrast, NT-proBNP level was higher in transgender women. The median (IQR) NT-proBNP concentration was significantly higher in transgender women ( 49 [32-86] ng/L) than in transgender men (17 [13-27] ng/L).Conclusions and relevanceFindings of this cross-sectional study suggest that the differences in concentration for hs-cTn and NT-proBNP between transgender men and women were similar to what is observed between cisgender men and women. Sex hormones, rather than sex assigned at birth, may be a stronger driver of the observed concentration differences between healthy men and women for biomarkers of cardiac disease.

Project description:AimsThe N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a commonly used biomarker in heart failure for diagnosis and prognostication. We aimed to determine the prevalence of NT-proBNP testing, distribution of NT-proBNP concentrations, and factors associated with receiving an NT-proBNP test in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including the subset with a worsening heart failure event (WHFE).Methods and resultsThis was a retrospective cohort study using two US databases: (i) the de-identified Humana Research Database between January 2015 and December 2018 and (ii) the Veradigm PINNACLE Registry® between July 2013 and September 2017. We included adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HFrEF. In each data source, a subgroup of patients with a WHFE was identified, where a WHFE was defined as a heart failure-related hospitalization or receipt of intravenous diuretics. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with receiving NT-proBNP testing. In Cohort 1 (n = 249 238), 9.2% of patients with HFrEF and 10.8% of patients with a WHFE received NT-proBNP testing. When restricted to patients with at least one laboratory claim, 11.3% of patients with HFrEF and 13.2% of those with a WHFE received NT-proBNP testing. In Cohort 2 (n = 91 444), 2.3% of patients with HFrEF were tested. Median (inter-quartile range) NT-proBNP concentrations among patients with HFrEF were 1399 (423-4087) pg/mL in Cohort 1 and 394 (142-688) pg/mL in Cohort 2. Median (inter-quartile range) NT-proBNP concentrations in the subset of patients with a WHFE in each cohort were 2209 (740-5894) and 464 (174-783) pg/mL, respectively. In Cohort 1, 13.4% of all HFrEF patients receiving NT-proBNP testing and 18.9% of patients with a WHFE had NT-proBNP values >8000 pg/mL; in Cohort 2, these percentages were 1.0% and 2.5%, respectively.ConclusionsIn US clinical practice, NT-proBNP testing was not frequently performed in patients with HFrEF. NT-proBNP concentrations varied across data sources and subpopulations within HFrEF.