Dataset Information

Adipokines, insulin resistance, and coronary artery calcification.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:We evaluated the hypothesis that plasma levels of adiponectin and leptin are independently but oppositely associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC), a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. In addition, we assessed which biomarkers of adiposity and insulin resistance are the strongest predictors of CAC beyond traditional risk factors, metabolic syndrome, and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP). BACKGROUND:Adipokines are fat-secreted biomolecules with pleiotropic actions that converge in diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS:We examined the association of plasma adipocytokines with CAC in 860 asymptomatic, nondiabetic participants in the SIRCA (Study of Inherited Risk of Coronary Atherosclerosis). RESULTS:Plasma adiponectin and leptin levels had opposite and distinct associations with adiposity, insulin resistance, and inflammation. Plasma leptin was positively (top vs. bottom quartile) associated with higher CAC after adjustment for age, gender, traditional risk factors, and Framingham risk scores (tobit regression ratio 2.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48 to 3.95; p = 0.002) and further adjustment for metabolic syndrome and CRP (tobit regression ratio: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.94; p = 0.002). In contrast, adiponectin levels were not associated with CAC. Comparative analyses suggested that levels of leptin, interleukin-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-2, as well as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, predicted CAC scores, but only leptin and HOMA-IR provided value beyond risk factors, metabolic syndrome, and CRP. CONCLUSIONS:In SIRCA, although both leptin and adiponectin levels were associated with metabolic and inflammatory markers, only leptin was a significant independent predictor of CAC. Of several metabolic markers, leptin and the HOMA-IR index had the most robust, independent associations with CAC.

SUBMITTER: Qasim A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2853595 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adipokines, insulin resistance, and coronary artery calcification.

Qasim Atif A Mehta Nehal N NN Tadesse Mahlet G MG Wolfe Megan L ML Rhodes Thomas T Girman Cynthia C Reilly Muredach P MP

Journal of the American College of Cardiology 20080701 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>We evaluated the hypothesis that plasma levels of adiponectin and leptin are independently but oppositely associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC), a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. In addition, we assessed which biomarkers of adiposity and insulin resistance are the strongest predictors of CAC beyond traditional risk factors, metabolic syndrome, and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP).<h4>Background</h4>Adipokines are fat-secreted biomolecules with pleiotropic ...[more]

PMID: 18617073

Similar Datasets

Project description:Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is responsible for high incidence of cardiovascular (CV) complications leading to heart failure. Coronary artery region-specific metabolic and structural assessment could provide deeper insight into the extent of the disease and help prevent adverse cardiac events. Therefore, in this study, we aimed at investigating such myocardial dynamics for the first time in insulin-sensitive (mIS) and insulin-resistant (mIR) T2D patients. We targeted global and region-specific variations using insulin sensitivity (IS) and coronary artery calcifications (CACs) as CV risk factor in T2D patients. IS was computed using myocardial segmentation approaches at both baseline and after an hyperglycemic-insulinemic clamp (HEC) on [18F]FDG-PET images using the standardized uptake value (SUV) (ΔSUV = SUVHEC - SUVBASELINE) and calcifications using CT Calcium Scoring. Results suggest that some communicating pathways between response to insulin and calcification are present in the myocardium, whilst differences between coronary arteries were only observed in the mIS cohort. Risk indicators were mostly observed for mIR and highly calcified subjects, which supports previously stated findings that exhibit a distinguished exposure depending on the impairment of response to insulin, while projecting added potential complications due to arterial obstruction. Moreover, a pattern relating calcification and T2D phenotypes was observed suggesting the avoidance of insulin treatment in mIS but its endorsement in mIR subjects. The right coronary artery displayed more ΔSUV, whilst plaque was more present in the circumflex. However, differences between phenotypes, and therefore CV risk, were associated to left descending artery (LAD) translating into higher CACs regarding IR, which could explain why insulin treatment was effective for LAD at the expense of higher likelihood of plaque accumulation. Personalized approaches to assess T2D may lead to more efficient treatments and risk-prevention strategies.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Vascular calcification is seen in most patients on dialysis and is strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality. Vascular calcification is promoted by phosphate, which generally reaches higher levels in hemodialysis than in peritoneal dialysis. However, whether vascular calcification develops less in peritoneal dialysis than in hemodialysis is currently unknown. Therefore, we compared coronary artery calcification (CAC), its progression, and calcification biomarkers between patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. METHODS:We measured CAC in 134 patients who had been treated exclusively with hemodialysis (n = 94) or peritoneal dialysis (n = 40) and were transplantation candidates. In 57 of them (34 on hemodialysis and 23 on peritoneal dialysis), we also measured CAC progression annually up to 3 years and the inactive species of desphospho-uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein (dp-ucMGP), fetuin-A, osteoprotegerin. We compared CAC cross-sectionally with Tobit regression. CAC progression was compared in 2 ways: with linear mixed models as the difference in square root transformed volume score per year (?CAC SQRV) and with Tobit mixed models. We adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS:In the cross-sectional cohort, CAC volume scores were 92 mm3 in hemodialysis and 492 mm3 in peritoneal dialysis (adjusted difference 436 mm3; 95% CI -47 to 919; p = 0.08). In the longitudinal cohort, peritoneal dialysis was associated with significantly more CAC progression defined as ?CAC SQRV (adjusted difference 1.20; 95% CI 0.09 to 2.31; p = 0.03), but not with Tobit mixed models (adjusted difference in CAC score increase per year 106 mm3; 95% CI -140 to 352; p = 0.40). Peritoneal dialysis was associated with higher osteoprotegerin (adjusted p = 0.02) but not with dp-ucMGP or fetuin-A. CONCLUSIONS:Peritoneal dialysis is not associated with less CAC or CAC progression than hemodialysis, and perhaps with even more progression. This indicates that vascular calcification does not develop less in peritoneal dialysis than in hemodialysis.

Dataset Information

Adipokines, insulin resistance, and coronary artery calcification.

Publications

Adipokines, insulin resistance, and coronary artery calcification.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets