Dataset Information

Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus or interferon-alpha.

ABSTRACT: Temsirolimus was approved in Europe as first-line treatment of poor-prognosis advanced renal cell carcinoma (advRCC) based on significant clinical benefits.Patients with advRCC and multiple poor-prognostic factors were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg intravenous temsirolimus weekly, interferon-alpha (titrated to 18 mU) three times weekly, or 15 mg intravenous temsirolimus weekly plus 6 mU of interferon-alpha three times weekly. EuroQol-5D utility score (EQ-5D index) and the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) responses were recorded. For analysis, patients were required to have their EQ-5D data recorded at baseline, week 12, and last visit after week 12. The analysis was conducted using last-visit data and a repeated-measures mixed-effect (RMME) model to evaluate quality-of-life differences between temsirolimus and interferon-alpha, controlling for baseline covariates.Average EQ-5D score at the last measure was significantly higher in patients receiving temsirolimus compared with interferon-alpha: by 0.10 on EQ-5D index (P=0.0279) and by 6.61 on EQ-VAS (P=0.0095). In the RMME model, the least-square mean for on-treatment EQ-5D index score was 0.590 with temsirolimus and 0.492 with interferon-alpha (P=0.0022).Temsirolimus is associated with significantly higher EQ-5D scores compared with interferon-alpha in patients with previously untreated poor-prognosis advRCC.

SUBMITTER: Yang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2869160 | biostudies-literature | 2010 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus or interferon-alpha.

Yang S S de Souza P P Alemao E E Purvis J J

British journal of cancer 20100501 10

<h4>Background</h4>Temsirolimus was approved in Europe as first-line treatment of poor-prognosis advanced renal cell carcinoma (advRCC) based on significant clinical benefits.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with advRCC and multiple poor-prognostic factors were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg intravenous temsirolimus weekly, interferon-alpha (titrated to 18 mU) three times weekly, or 15 mg intravenous temsirolimus weekly plus 6 mU of interferon-alpha three times weekly. EuroQol-5D utility score (EQ-5 ...[more]

PMID: 20461090

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTemsirolimus has level 1 evidence for initial treatment of poor-risk patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but its efficacy has not been directly compared with an antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor [VEGFR TKi]) in this setting.ObjectiveTo evaluate temsirolimus versus pazopanib as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC, predominant clear-cell features, and clinical characteristics of a poor prognosis.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized (1:1) phase II trial in 69 treatment-naïve mRCC patients and with three or more predictors of short survival for temsirolimus was conducted during 2012-2017 in a single academic cancer center. Crossover to the alternative treatment upon discontinuation of the first-line agent was permitted.InterventionMechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor temsirolimus and VEGFR TKi pazopanib.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Radiographic response was assessed by blinded radiologists. Efficacy outcomes were adjusted by prior nephrectomy status, prior interleukin-2 treatment, and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score.Results and limitationsThirty-five patients received temsirolimus and 34 received pazopanib upfront; 72% overall had poor risk by IMDC. Median PFS in the first line was 2.7mo with temsirolimus and 5.2mo with pazopanib (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.22; p=0.210). Median OS was 7.1mo with temsirolimus and 11.9mo with pazopanib (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.93; p=0.558), and ORRs were 5.9% and 21.2%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.3; p=0.062). PRO measures favored pazopanib. Five patients discontinued first-line therapy due to adverse events.ConclusionsTemsirolimus and pazopanib had modest activity in patients with poor-risk clear-cell mRCC, and therefore their use should be discouraged in this setting.Patient summaryWe evaluated outcomes of advanced renal cell carcinoma patients presenting with aggressive features when treated with temsirolimus or pazopanib as first-line therapy. Survival was <1yr for most, suggesting that more efficacious alternative treatments should be favored for these patients.

Project description:PurposeWe report longitudinal patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes related to xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).Materials and methodsPatients treated from May 2012 through December 2016 at a single institution for AJCC7 stage III-IV, M0 oropharyngeal cancer were given the 15-item Xerostomia-Related QoL Scale (XeQoLS) before, during, and for up to 2 years after treatment. We evaluated the evolution of xerostomia-related QoL over that time, and examined potential associations between those measures with clinical characteristics.ResultsSixty-nine patients had XeQoLS scores at baseline and at least once either during or after treatment. The mean (±SD) XeQoLS score (0-4) was 0.24 ± 0.57 at baseline. Subsequent scores were 2.00 ± 1.01 at 6 weeks on treatment, and 1.03 ± 0.76, 0.97 ± 0.78, 0.82 ± 0.69, and 0.70 ± 0.75 at 10 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment, respectively. All were statistically different from baseline (p < 0.001). Univariate analyses demonstrated associations between XeQoLS score and time (p < 0.0001 for each interval), baseline XeQoLS score (p < 0.0001), stage (p = 0.008), N status (p = 0.006), and mean oral cavity dose (p = 0.038), but not for age, sex, T status, receipt of chemotherapy, smoking history, disease site, laterality of neck irradiation, mean parotid dose, or mean submandibular dose. Multivariate analysis suggested that baseline XeQoLS scores, phase of treatment, and N status were associated with XeQoLS scores measured during treatment and recovery.ConclusionsPatients receiving IMPT reported the greatest xerostomia-related QoL impairment at 6 weeks on treatment, with a 49% improvement by 10 weeks after treatment; however, XeQoLS scores remained above baseline after 2 years. As we aim to establish the value of IMPT in oropharyngeal tumors to de-intensify treatment over conventional therapy, these data help inform discussions about xerostomia-related quality of life for patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with IMPT.

Dataset Information

Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus or interferon-alpha.

Publications

Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus or interferon-alpha.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure