Dataset Information

Translational research in the Gynecologic Oncology Group: evaluation of ovarian cancer markers, profiles, and novel therapies.

ABSTRACT: To review the translational research (TR) performed in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) to evaluate ovarian cancer markers, profiles and novel therapies.Prospective trials with stand alone or embedded TR objectives involving patient and specimen accrual as well as retrospective studies using banked specimens and resources were and continue to be performed in the GOG. Appropriate statistical methods are employed to evaluate associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes including tumor response, adverse events, progression free survival and overall survival.Highlights are presented for some of the collaborative and multidisciplinary TR conducted with the GOG to evaluate markers, pathway and novel therapeutics in epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal and/or fallopian tube cancer. For example, in GOG 111, high immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of cyclin E was associated with a shorter median survival (29 versus 35 months) and an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]=1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.0-2.1, p=0.05). In GOG 114/132, non-detectable immunoblot expression of maspin was associated with debulking status (p=0.034) and an increased risk of disease progression (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.04-3.45, p=0.038) and death (HR=1.99, 95% CI=1.07-3.69, p=0.030) while high CD105-microvessel density (MVD), but not CD31-MVD in tumor was associated with increased risk of disease progression (HR=1.873, 95% CI=1.102-3.184, p=0.020) but not death. In GOG 172, low IHC expression of BRCA1 was associated with advanced stage (p<0.001), serous histology (p<0.001) and a reduced risk of disease progression (HR=0.64, 95% CI=0.42-0.96) and death (HR=0.51, 95% CI=0.32-0.83) while the CA/AA versus CC genotypes in C8092A in ERCC1 were associated with an increased risk of disease progression (HR=1.44, 95% CI=1.06-1.94, p=0.018) and death (HR=1.50, 95% CI=1.07-2.09, p=0.018).The GOG has an extensive TR program that provides clues regarding the molecular and biochemical mechanisms of disease, treatments and outcomes in women with or at risk for a gynecologic malignancy.

SUBMITTER: Darcy KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2877379 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Translational research in the Gynecologic Oncology Group: evaluation of ovarian cancer markers, profiles, and novel therapies.

Darcy Kathleen M KM Birrer Michael J MJ

Gynecologic oncology 20100316 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>To review the translational research (TR) performed in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) to evaluate ovarian cancer markers, profiles and novel therapies.<h4>Methods</h4>Prospective trials with stand alone or embedded TR objectives involving patient and specimen accrual as well as retrospective studies using banked specimens and resources were and continue to be performed in the GOG. Appropriate statistical methods are employed to evaluate associations with clinical charact ...[more]

PMID: 20233625

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe vascular disrupting agent fosbretabulin tromethamine selectively targets pre-existing tumor vasculature, which causes vascular shutdown and leads to cancer cell death and necrosis. Antiangiogenesis agents such as bevacizumab, a humanized antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, might prevent revascularization during and after treatment with a vascular disrupting agent.Patients and methodsPatients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma, measurable or detectable disease, and three or fewer prior regimens were randomly assigned to bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks) or the combination of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) plus fosbretabulin (60 mg/m(2)) intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression or toxicity. Randomization was stratified by disease status (measurable v nonmeasurable), prior bevacizumab, and platinum-free interval. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was designed with 80% power for a one-sided alternative at a 10% level of significance to detect a reduction in the hazard by 37.5%.ResultsThe study enrolled 107 patients. Median PFS was 4.8 months for bevacizumab and 7.3 months for bevacizumab plus fosbretabulin (hazard ratio, 0.69; 90% two-sided CI, 0.47 to 1.00; one-sided P = .05). The proportion responding (overall response rate) to bevacizumab was 28.2% among 39 patients with measurable disease and 35.7% among 42 patients treated with the combination. The relative probability of responding was 1.27 (90% CI, 0.74 to 2.17; one-sided P = .24). Adverse events greater than grade 3 were more common in the combination regimen than in bevacizumab only for hypertension (35% v 20%). There was one grade 3 thromboembolic event in the combination arm and one intestinal fistula in the bevacizumab only arm.ConclusionOn the basis of the PFS, overall response rate, and tolerability of these two antivascular therapies, further evaluation is warranted for this chemotherapy-free regimen. Fosbretabulin in combination with bevacizumab increases the risk of hypertension.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Potential predictive/prognostic angiogenic markers were prospectively examined in a phase II trial of bevacizumab in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)/primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). METHODS:Recurrent/persistent EOC/PPC patients were treated with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV q21days) until disease progression. Validated-immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were performed on pre-cycle 1/4 tumor biopsies for CD31-microvessel density (MVD), VEGF-histoscore (HS), p53-HS, and TSP1 image analysis score (IA). Pre-cycle 1/4 serum and plasma VEGF were quantified using a validated-ELISA. RESULTS:CD31-MVD and serum VEGF, evaluated pre-cycle 1 in 41/61 and 51/61 eligible patients, respectively, did not appear to be correlated. High CD31-MVD, categorized at the median, appeared to be associated with tumor response, a 13-month shorter median survival, and an increased risk of death (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.067-4.467). In addition, each standard deviation (SD) increase in CD31-MVD appeared to be associated with worse survival in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. IHC and plasma biomarkers did not change with bevacizumab treatment except for serum VEGF, which appeared to decrease during bevacizumab treatment. This decrease was not associated with response. High pre-cycle 1 serum VEGF, categorized at the median, was associated with 22-month shorter median survival and an increased risk of death (unadjusted HR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.369-5.191). Categorized p53 appeared to be associated with unadjusted survival and each SD increase in TSP1-IA appeared to be associated with a decreased risk of progression in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS:Despite the limitations in sample size and exploratory nature of the study, angiogenic markers in tumor and serum may provide prognostic value in recurrent/persistent EOC/PPC, and are being prospectively evaluated in the GOG phase III trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab/placebo in previously untreated EOC/PPC.

Project description:PURPOSE Sorafenib is a kinase inhibitor targeting Raf and other kinases (ie, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor [VEGFR], platelet-derived growth factor receptor [PDGFR], Flt3, and c-KIT). This study assessed its activity and tolerability in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) or primary peritoneal carcinomatosis (PPC). METHODS This open-label, multi-institutional, phase II study used a two-stage design. Eligible patients had persistent or recurrent OC/PPC after one to two prior cytotoxic regimens, and they experienced progression within 12 months of platinum-based therapy. Treatment consisted of sorafenib 400 mg orally twice per day. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and toxicity by National Cancer Institute criteria. Secondary end points were tumor response and duration of PFS and overall survival. Biomarker analyses included measurement of ERK and b-Raf expression in tumors and phosphorylation of ERK (pERK) in peripheral-blood lymphocytes (PBLs) before and after 1 month of treatment. Results Seventy-three patients were enrolled, of which 71 were eligible. Fifty-nine eligible patients (83%) had measurable disease, and 12 (17%) had detectable disease. Significant grade 3 or 4 toxicities included the following: rash (n = 7), hand-foot syndrome (n = 9), metabolic (n = 10), GI (n = 3), cardiovascular (n = 2), and pulmonary (n = 2). Only patients with measurable disease were used to assess efficacy. Fourteen survived progression free for at least 6 months (24%; 90% CI, 15% to 35%). Two patients had partial responses (3.4%; 90% CI, 1% to 10%); 20 had stable disease; 30 had progressive disease; and seven could not have their tumor assessed. ERK and b-Raf were expressed in all tumors. Exploratory analyses indicated that pERK in post-treatment PBL specimens was associated with PFS. CONCLUSION Sorafenib has modest antitumor activity in patients with recurrent OC, but the activity was at the expense of substantial toxicity.

Dataset Information

Translational research in the Gynecologic Oncology Group: evaluation of ovarian cancer markers, profiles, and novel therapies.

Publications

Translational research in the Gynecologic Oncology Group: evaluation of ovarian cancer markers, profiles, and novel therapies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure