Dataset Information

Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Current frequent follow-up after treatment for breast cancer does not meet its intended aims, but does depend on expensive and scarce specialized knowledge for routine history taking and physical examinations. The study described in this paper compared patient satisfaction with a reduced follow-up strategy, i.e. nurse-led telephone follow-up, to satisfaction with traditional hospital follow-up.

Methods

Patient satisfaction was assessed among patients (n=299) who were participants of a randomized controlled trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of several follow-up strategies in the first year after treatment for breast cancer. Data on patient satisfaction were collected at baseline, three, six and 12 months after treatment, using the Dutch version of Ware's Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III (PSQ III). In addition to general satisfaction, the PSQ III reports on satisfaction scores for technical competence, interpersonal aspects, and access of care. Regression analysis was used to predict satisfaction scores from whether or not nurse-led telephone follow-up was received.

Results

Nurse-led telephone follow-up had no statistically significant influence on general patient satisfaction (p=0.379), satisfaction with technical competence (p=0.249), and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects (p=0.662). Regarding access of care, patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher for patients receiving telephone follow-up (p=0.015). However, a mean difference at 12 months of 3.1 points was judged to be not clinically relevant.

Conclusions

No meaningful differences were found in satisfaction scores between nurse-led telephone and hospital follow-up in the first year after breast cancer treatment. With high satisfaction scores and the potential to substantially reduce clinic visits, nurse-led telephone follow-up may be an acceptable alternative to traditional hospital follow-up.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN 74071417.

SUBMITTER: Kimman ML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2880988 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEnd-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is the final and permanent stage of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Hemodialysis (HD) is the most common treatment for CKD. To have desirable therapeutic outcomes, patients have to adhere to a specific therapeutic regimen that reduces the hospitalization rate and side-effects of HD. The present study aimed to determine the effects of the patient education program and nurse-led telephone follow-up on adherence to the treatment in hemodialysis patients.MethodsThis is a randomized controlled trial in which a total of 66 patients were recruited using convenience sampling and then randomly assigned to two groups of control (n = 33) and intervention (n = 33). Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, the laboratory results record sheet, and the End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), which included four dimensions of HD attendance, medication use, fluid restrictions, and diet recommendations. The intervention group received a patient education program and nurse-led follow-up services through telephone communication and the Short Message Service (SMS) for 3 months. All participants filled in the questionnaire before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).ResultsThe results showed a significant difference in the mean scores of HD attendance, medication use, fluid restrictions, and diet recommendations between the two groups immediately, 1 month, and 3 months after the intervention (p < .001). The results also indicated a significant difference in the mean scores of four dimensions during the four-time points of measurement in the intervention group (P < 0.0005). Therefore, the level of treatment adherence in the intervention group was higher than in the control group. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the mean score of laboratory values between the two groups after the intervention, except for the level of serum sodium (P = 0.130).ConclusionImplementation of the patient education program and nurse-led follow-up can lead to better adherence to hemodialysis in four dimensions of HD attendance, medication use, fluid restrictions, and dietary recommendations in HD patients.Trial registrationIRCT registration number: IRCT20190127042512N1 ; Registration date: 2020-09-12; Registration timing: retrospectively registered: Last update: 2020-09-12.

Project description:There are no universally accepted guidelines for the follow-up of individuals with cutaneous melanoma. Furthermore, to date, there have been no randomised controlled trials of different models of melanoma follow-up care. This randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of GP-led melanoma follow-up on patient satisfaction, follow-up guideline compliance, anxiety and depression, as well as health status.A randomised controlled trial of GP-led follow-up of cutaneous melanoma was conducted over a period of 1 year with assessment by self-completed questionnaires and review of general practice-held medical records at baseline and 12 months later. It took place in 35 general practices in North-east Scotland. Subjects were 142 individuals (51.4% women 48.6% men; mean (s.d.) age 59.2 (15.2) years previously treated for cutaneous melanoma and free of recurrent disease. The intervention consisted of protocol-driven melanoma reviews in primary care, conducted by trained GPs and supported by centralised recall, rapid access pathway to secondary care and a patient information booklet. The main outcome measure was patient satisfaction measured by questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were adherence to guidelines, health status measured by Short Form-36 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.There were significant improvements in 5 out of 15 aspects of patient satisfaction during the study year in those receiving GP-led melanoma follow-up (all P<or=0.01). The intervention group was significantly more satisfied with 7 out of 15 aspects of care at follow-up after adjustment for potential confounders. There was significantly greater adherence to guidelines in the intervention group during the study year. There was no significant difference in health status or anxiety and depression between intervention and control groups at either baseline or outcome.GP-led follow-up is feasible, engenders greater satisfaction in those patients who receive it, permits closer adherence to guidelines and does not result in adverse effects on health status or anxiety and depression when compared with traditional hospital-based follow-up for melanoma.

Project description:ImportanceFollow-up assessment of patients who had treatment for head and neck cancer is critical and an important part of the overall treatment program. During each visit to the hospital, patients are evaluated by a physician and may undergo additional tests. Because it has been observed that the symptoms mentioned by patients often guide the treating clinicians in identifying cancer recurrence, an appropriately constructed questionnaire can help clinicians determine which patients need further testing as a result of a recurrence and which patients can continue to be monitored remotely.ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of a symptom-based telephone questionnaire in detecting recurrences in patients with radically treated oral cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective diagnostic cohort study was conducted from October 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019. This study took place at Tata Memorial Centre, an apex referral cancer center in India. A total of 615 consecutive patients with oral cancer were screened, of whom 400 patients consented to be a part of the study. After completion of curative treatment, these patients were followed up for 2 months to 2 years. We excluded patients younger than 18 years or older than 80 years, those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status greater than 2, and those who had already been diagnosed with recurrent disease.Interventions/exposuresThe patients were contacted 2 weeks before their clinic appointment, and a telephone interview was conducted using a predefined questionnaire. Based on patients' responses to these questions, their disease status was estimated. Subsequently, during the actual follow-up visit, a trained head and neck surgeon, who was blinded to the questionnaire result, examined them.Main outcomes and measuresThe sensitivity and specificity of the telephone questionnaire were calculated by comparing its results with those of the trained head and neck surgeon after the clinical evaluation.ResultsOf the 615 patients screened, 400 consented to be part of the study. Participants had a median (interquartile range) age of 49 (41-56) years, and 334 (83.5%) were men. Recurrence was noted in 20 patients (5.0%). The telephone-based questionnaire was found to have sensitivity of 90.0%, specificity of 74.2%, positive predictive value of 15.5%, and negative predictive value of 99.3%. Clinical examination values were 100.0%, 92.9%, 42.5%, and 100.0%, respectively. A total of 124 patients (31.0%) said that they would prefer such a telephone follow-up compared with an actual physical follow-up visit.Conclusions and relevanceThis diagnostic cohort study found that a symptom-based telephone questionnaire had good sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting recurrences in patients with oral cancer on follow-up evaluation after completion of definitive treatment.