Dataset Information

Prediction of protease substrates using sequence and structure features.

ABSTRACT: Granzyme B (GrB) and caspases cleave specific protein substrates to induce apoptosis in virally infected and neoplastic cells. While substrates for both types of proteases have been determined experimentally, there are many more yet to be discovered in humans and other metazoans. Here, we present a bioinformatics method based on support vector machine (SVM) learning that identifies sequence and structural features important for protease recognition of substrate peptides and then uses these features to predict novel substrates. Our approach can act as a convenient hypothesis generator, guiding future experiments by high-confidence identification of peptide-protein partners.The method is benchmarked on the known substrates of both protease types, including our literature-curated GrB substrate set (GrBah). On these benchmark sets, the method outperforms a number of other methods that consider sequence only, predicting at a 0.87 true positive rate (TPR) and a 0.13 false positive rate (FPR) for caspase substrates, and a 0.79 TPR and a 0.21 FPR for GrB substrates. The method is then applied to approximately 25 000 proteins in the human proteome to generate a ranked list of predicted substrates of each protease type. Two of these predictions, AIF-1 and SMN1, were selected for further experimental analysis, and each was validated as a GrB substrate.All predictions for both protease types are publically available at http://salilab.org/peptide. A web server is at the same site that allows a user to train new SVM models to make predictions for any protein that recognizes specific oligopeptide ligands.

SUBMITTER: Barkan DT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2894511 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prediction of protease substrates using sequence and structure features.

Barkan David T DT Hostetter Daniel R DR Mahrus Sami S Pieper Ursula U Wells James A JA Craik Charles S CS Sali Andrej A

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20100526 14

<h4>Motivation</h4>Granzyme B (GrB) and caspases cleave specific protein substrates to induce apoptosis in virally infected and neoplastic cells. While substrates for both types of proteases have been determined experimentally, there are many more yet to be discovered in humans and other metazoans. Here, we present a bioinformatics method based on support vector machine (SVM) learning that identifies sequence and structural features important for protease recognition of substrate peptides and th ...[more]

PMID: 20505003

Similar Datasets

Project description:Small ribonucleic acid (sRNA) sequences are 50-500 nucleotide long, noncoding RNA (ncRNA) sequences that play an important role in regulating transcription and translation within a bacterial cell. As such, identifying sRNA sequences within an organism's genome is essential to understand the impact of the RNA molecules on cellular processes. Recently, numerous machine learning models have been applied to predict sRNAs within bacterial genomes. In this study, we considered the sRNA prediction as an imbalanced binary classification problem to distinguish minor positive sRNAs from major negative ones within imbalanced data and then performed a comparative study with six learning algorithms and seven assessment metrics. First, we collected numerical feature groups extracted from known sRNAs previously identified in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 (SLT2) and Escherichia coli K12 (E. coli K12) genomes. Second, as a preliminary study, we characterized the sRNA-size distribution with the conformity test for Benford's law. Third, we applied six traditional classification algorithms to sRNA features and assessed classification performance with seven metrics, varying positive-to-negative instance ratios, and utilizing stratified 10-fold cross-validation. We revisited important individual features and feature groups and found that classification with combined features perform better than with either an individual feature or a single feature group in terms of Area Under Precision-Recall curve (AUPR). We reconfirmed that AUPR properly measures classification performance on imbalanced data with varying imbalance ratios, which is consistent with previous studies on classification metrics for imbalanced data. Overall, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), even without exploiting optimal hyperparameter values, performed better than the other five algorithms with specific optimal parameter settings. As a future work, we plan to extend XGBoost further to a large amount of published sRNAs in bacterial genomes and compare its classification performance with recent machine learning models' performance.

Project description:MotivationProtein structure prediction has been greatly improved by deep learning, but the contribution of different information is yet to be fully understood. This article studies the impacts of two kinds of information for structure prediction: template and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) embedding. Templates have been used by some methods before, such as AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold and RaptorX. AlphaFold2 and RosetTTAFold only used templates detected by HHsearch, which may not perform very well on some targets. In addition, sequence embedding generated by pre-trained protein language models has not been fully explored for structure prediction. In this article, we study the impact of templates (including the number of templates, the template quality and how the templates are generated) on protein structure prediction accuracy, especially when the templates are detected by methods other than HHsearch. We also study the impact of sequence embedding (generated by MSATransformer and ESM-1b) on structure prediction.ResultsWe have implemented a deep learning method for protein structure prediction that may take templates and MSA embedding as extra inputs. We study the contribution of templates and MSA embedding to structure prediction accuracy. Our experimental results show that templates can improve structure prediction on 71 of 110 CASP13 (13th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) targets and 47 of 91 CASP14 targets, and templates are particularly useful for targets with similar templates. MSA embedding can improve structure prediction on 63 of 91 CASP14 (14th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) targets and 87 of 183 CAMEO targets and is particularly useful for proteins with shallow MSAs. When both templates and MSA embedding are used, our method can predict correct folds (TMscore > 0.5) for 16 of 23 CASP14 FM targets and 14 of 18 Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO) targets, outperforming RoseTTAFold by 5% and 7%, respectively.Availability and implementationAvailable at https://github.com/xluo233/RaptorXFold.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Dataset Information

Prediction of protease substrates using sequence and structure features.

Publications

Prediction of protease substrates using sequence and structure features.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets