Dataset Information

Basal cell carcinoma chemoprevention with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in genetically predisposed PTCH1+/- humans and mice.

ABSTRACT: In vitro and epidemiologic studies favor the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in preventing skin squamous photocarcinogenesis, but there has been relatively little study of their efficacy in preventing the more common skin basal cell carcinoma (BCC) carcinogenesis. We first compared the relative anti-BCC effects of genetic deletion and NSAID pharmacologic inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes in the skin of Ptch1(+/-) mice. We then assessed the effects of celecoxib on the development of BCCs in a 3-year, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial in 60 (PTCH1(+/-)) patients with the basal cell nevus syndrome. In Ptch1(+/-) mice, genetic deletion of COX1 or COX2 robustly decreased (75%; P < 0.05) microscopic BCC tumor burden, but pharmacologic inhibition with celecoxib reduced microscopic BCCs less efficaciously (35%; P < 0.05). In the human trial, we detected a trend for oral celecoxib reducing BCC burden in all subjects (P = 0.069). Considering only the 60% of patients with less severe disease (<15 BCCs at study entry), celecoxib significantly reduced BCC number and burden: subjects receiving placebo had a 50% increase in BCC burden per year, whereas subjects in the celecoxib group had a 20% increase (P(difference) = 0.024). Oral celecoxib treatment inhibited BCC carcinogenesis in PTCH1(+/-) mice and had a significant anti-BCC effect in humans with less severe disease.

SUBMITTER: Tang JY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2894531 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been suggested to protect against esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This study examined the effect of NSAIDs on the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus (BE), the precursor lesion to EAC.MethodsWe conducted a case-control study among eligible patients scheduled for either elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or recruited from primary care clinics to undergo a study EGD. We compared 323 patients with BE (296 nondysplastic and 27 dysplastic) with 2 separate control groups: 1347 patients from the elective EGD group (endoscopy controls) and 502 patients from the primary care group (primary care controls) with no endoscopic or histopathologic BE. Use of aspirin products and 23 nonaspirin NSAIDs was ascertained from detailed, self-reported questionnaires. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable logistic regression models.ResultsThere were no significant differences in self-reported NSAID use between all BE cases and all controls (58.2% vs 54.6%; P = .33); this was seen for aspirin products (43.0% vs 37.4%; P = .08) and nonaspirin NSAIDs (7.7% vs 8.9%; P = .46). These findings persisted in the multivariable model for any NSAIDs (adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.75-1.28), aspirin (adjusted OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.90-1.51), and nonaspirin NSAIDs (adjusted OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55-1.39). Use of a combination of aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs was reported in 7.4% of cases and 8.3% of controls, and a nonsignificant inverse association with BE was seen (adjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44-1.11). There was no significant association between BE and daily NSAID use (adjusted OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.37). Similar findings were observed for comparisons involving nondysplastic or dysplastic BE cases, and endoscopy or primary care control groups separately or combined.ConclusionsThe use of NSAIDs was not associated with a reduced risk of BE. It is likely that the protective mechanism of NSAIDs on EAC occurs subsequent to the development of BE.

Dataset Information

Basal cell carcinoma chemoprevention with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in genetically predisposed PTCH1+/- humans and mice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets