Dataset Information

Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis.

ABSTRACT: The three-dimensional correction of severe rigid scoliosis has been improved by segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. However, there can be significant difficulty related to the use of a rigid rod, especially in the apex region of severe scoliosis. This study is a retrospective matched cohort study to evaluate the advantages of Nitinol shape memory alloy (SMA) rod-based correction by comparing the clinical and radiographic results obtained from using a temporary SMA rod and those from a standard rod in the correction of severe scoliosis. From May 2004 to September 2006, patients with matched curve type, ages at surgery, operative methods and fusion levels in our institute and instrumented with either SMA rods (n = 14) or traditional correction techniques (n = 16) were reviewed. In SMA group, the SMA rods served as a temporary intraoperative tool for deformity correction and were replaced by standard rods. The blood loss at surgery averaged 778 +/- 285 ml in the traditional group and 585 +/- 188 ml in the SMA group (P < 0.05). Operative time averaged 284 +/- 53 min in the SMA group and 324 +/- 41 min in the traditional group (P < 0.05). In the SMA group, the preoperative major curve was 92.6 degrees +/- 13.7 degrees with a flexibility of 25.5 +/- 7.3% was corrected to 29.4 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees demonstrating a 68.4% immediate postoperative correction. In the traditional group, the preoperative major curve was 88.6 degrees +/- 14.6 degrees with a flexibility of 29.3 +/- 6.6% was corrected to 37.2 degrees +/- 7.3 degrees demonstrating a 57.8% immediate postoperative correction. There was a statistic difference between the SMA group and traditional group in correction rate of the major thoracic curve. In the SMA group, one case suffered from deep infection 2 months postoperatively. In the traditional group, 6 of 16 cases suffered pedicle screw pull out or loosening during placement of the standard rod at the apex vertebrae on the concave side. In three cases, the mono-axial pedicle screws near the apex were abandoned and in five cases replaced with poly-axial pedicle screws. This study shows that the temporary use of SMA rod may reduce the operative time, blood loss, while improve the correction of the coronal plane when compared with standard techniques.

SUBMITTER: Wang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2899749 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis.

Wang Yan Y Zheng Guoquan G Zhang Xuesong X Zhang Yonggang Y Xiao Songhua S Wang Zheng Z

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 20091110 3

The three-dimensional correction of severe rigid scoliosis has been improved by segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. However, there can be significant difficulty related to the use of a rigid rod, especially in the apex region of severe scoliosis. This study is a retrospective matched cohort study to evaluate the advantages of Nitinol shape memory alloy (SMA) rod-based correction by comparing the clinical and radiographic results obtained from using a temporary SMA rod and those from a stand ...[more]

PMID: 19902275

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders and shows favourable clinical results. Recently, cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has become a new trajectory for screw insertion in the lumbar spine. Several biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the CBT technique achieves screw purchase and strength greater than the traditional method. Currently, the available data on the clinical effectiveness of the two performed surgeries, TLIF with CBT screws (CBT-TLIF) and TLIF with traditional pedicle screws (PS-TLIF), are insufficient. This is the first randomised study to compare CBT-TLIF against traditional PS fixation and will provide recommendations for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disorders.Methods and analysisA blinded randomised controlled trial (blinding for the patient and statistician, rather than for the clinician and researcher) will be conducted. A total of 254 participants with lumbar disc degenerative disease who are candidates for TLIF surgery will be randomly allocated to either the CBT-TLIF group or the PS-TLIF group at a ratio of 1:1. The primary clinical outcome measures are the incidence of adjacent cranial facet joint violation, fusion rate and the screw loosening rate. Secondary clinical outcome measures are Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of back pain, VAS of leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss and complications. These parameters will be evaluated on day 3, and then at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (batch: 2017-03). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and an international spine-related meeting after completion of the study.Trial registration numberNCT03105167; Pre-results.

Project description:BackgroundCurrent methods of measuring vertebral rotation by plain radiographs rely on anatomic landmarks that are not present in the postoperative spine or require advanced imaging. Furthermore, there are few studies on the incidence of crankshaft with modern pedicle instrumentation.Questions/purposesWe sought to (1) describe and validate a method of vertebral rotation measurement using plain radiographs and (2) measure postoperative rotation in a series of patients treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.MethodsPatients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with surgery over a 6-year period were reviewed. Patients with computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs within 60 days of another were included. Vertebral rotation was calculated by radiographic measurements and measured directly by CT scan. As an internal control, patients with two apical pedicle screws on all radiographs were analyzed. Rotation was measured for all patients with at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up.ResultsThree thousand five hundred fifty-two instrumented spinal levels in 308 consecutive patients were reviewed. Ten patients with 93 screws were analyzed by CT and radiographs. The average discrepancy between computed tomography (CT) and radiographs was 3.3?±?1.9°, with 81.7% (76/93) within 5°. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for measured axial rotation were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)?=?0.879 and 0.900, respectively). One hundred swventy-eight patients were eligible with an average follow-up of 2.3?±?1.2 years; 84.8% (151/178) had screw(s) visible on all images at the major curve apex. The average postsurgical rotation was 3.5?±?2.9°; 19.2% (29/151) were measured to have a rotation over 5°, and 4.0% (6/151) demonstrated a rotation over 10°. Only 4.6% (7/151) of patients demonstrated a postoperative Cobb angle change over 10°.ConclusionsMost major curves have apical pedicle screw instrumentation that can be followed by radiographs alone to measure rotation. Vertebral rotation measurement requires only plain radiographs and is a more sensitive determination for subtle postoperative crankshaft than change in Cobb angle.

Project description:Pedicles are often broken when screws are inserted into hard pedicles with small diameters or when the diameter of the screw itself is inadequate. However, there is a lack of biomechanical literature that addresses screw loosening as a result of broken pedicles or the resulting salvage of those screws. We performed a novel in vitro study to compare the pullout strength of screws between intact pedicles and two different types of broken pedicles; strategies to prevent screw loosening were also compared. Thirty L4 Sawbones were designed to represent intact pedicles, semi-pedicles, and nonpedicles and were prepared for screw insertion. Three sizes of polyaxial screws (diameter × length dimensions of 6.0 mm × 45 mm, 6.0 mm × 50 mm and 6.5 mm × 45 mm) were independently and randomly distributed into the intact-pedicle group (IP group, n = 30), the semi-pedicle group (SP group, n = 15), or the nonpedicle group (NP group, n = 15). The experiments were conducted across a minimum of five trials for each of the chosen screw sizes. We then analyzed the results of the imaging, pullout testing, and embedded bone volume. Any fractures or defects of the vertebrae caused by screw insertion were excluded from the study. The appropriate screw trajectory and insertional depth were confirmed using axial and sagittal X-ray imaging prior to screw pullout testing. A pullout strength of only 41% to 45% for the SP group and 29% to 39% for the NP group was retained following a broken pedicle. The use of longer or larger-diameter screws appears to be an effective salvaging procedure for the NP group (p < 0.05). The embedded bone volume percentage analysis indicated that, compared to the IP group, 68% to 76% of effective bone embedded into the screw threads in the SP group, and 58% to 65% in the NP group. There was no direct correlation between the pullout strength and the embedded bone volume; however, less effective embedded bone volume was associated with lower pullout strength. This study describes the evolution of the well-established screw pullout test being applied to the broken pedicle Sawbone testing model. The pedicle plays an important role in determining the pullout strength of a screw. However, a salvage procedure that utilizes a longer or larger-diameter screw might be a reliable clinical approach to address broken pedicles.

Dataset Information

Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis.

Publications

Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets