Dataset Information

A simplified approach to human islet quality assessment.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The successful treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes by islet transplantation is affected by a multitude of factors of which infusion of the highest quality tissue is essential. The current standard pretransplant quality assessments lack sensitivity, accuracy, and objectivity in the determination of islet viability and potency. We hypothesized that a multiparametric approach focused on islet cell metabolic state, mitochondrial integrity, and in vitro glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) could provide data predictive of in vivo function. The objective of this study was to validate a novel set of islet quality assays and develop a simplified islet quality scoring system for both basic research and clinical applications. METHODS:A series of 42 human islet preparations were screened using standard and novel methods, which included determination of yield, viability by fluorescent microscopy, GSIS, percentage of islet loss in culture, quantification of adenine nucleotides, flow cytometric measurement of viability, apoptosis, and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). In vivo functional potency was tested by minimal model transplant in streptozotocin-induced diabetic NOD.scid mice. RESULTS:Functionally potent islet preparations showed significantly greater numbers of cells with polarized MMP, higher ATP-to-ADP ratios, and increased glucose-induced insulin secretion. The MMP, ATP-to-ADP ratio, and GSIS data were combined into a single islet scoring formula that showed more than 86% accuracy in predicting in vivo functional potency. CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates that a multiparametric approach using objective assessments focused on islet cell mitochondrial integrity and in vitro function can provide data predictive of in vivo function.

SUBMITTER: Hanson MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2948961 | biostudies-literature | 2010 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A simplified approach to human islet quality assessment.

Hanson Matthew S MS Park Elisa E EE Sears Mallory L ML Greenwood Krista K KK Danobeitia Juan Sebastian JS Hullett Debra A DA Fernandez Luis A LA

Transplantation 20100501 10

<h4>Background</h4>The successful treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes by islet transplantation is affected by a multitude of factors of which infusion of the highest quality tissue is essential. The current standard pretransplant quality assessments lack sensitivity, accuracy, and objectivity in the determination of islet viability and potency. We hypothesized that a multiparametric approach focused on islet cell metabolic state, mitochondrial integrity, and in vitro glucose-stimulated in ...[more]

PMID: 20182409

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study questionCan we make the comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) for human sperm a more accurate and informative high throughput assay?Summary answerWe developed a standardized automated high throughput comet (HT-COMET) assay for human sperm that improves its accuracy and efficiency, and could be of prognostic value to patients in the fertility clinic.What is known alreadyThe comet assay involves the collection of data on sperm DNA damage at the level of the single cell, allowing the use of samples from severe oligozoospermic patients. However, this makes comet scoring a low throughput procedure that renders large cohort analyses tedious. Furthermore, the comet assay comes with an inherent vulnerability to variability. Our objective is to develop an automated high throughput comet assay for human sperm that will increase both its accuracy and efficiency.Study design, size, durationThe study comprised two distinct components: a HT-COMET technical optimization section based on control versus DNAse treatment analyses ( ITALIC! n = 3-5), and a cross-sectional study on 123 men presenting to a reproductive center with sperm concentrations categorized as severe oligozoospermia, oligozoospermia or normozoospermia.Participants/materials, setting, methodsSperm chromatin quality was measured using the comet assay: on classic 2-well slides for software comparison; on 96-well slides for HT-COMET optimization; after exposure to various concentrations of a damage-inducing agent, DNAse, using HT-COMET; on 123 subjects with different sperm concentrations using HT-COMET. Data from the 123 subjects were correlated to classic semen quality parameters and plotted as single-cell data in individual DNA damage profiles.Main results and the role of chanceWe have developed a standard automated HT-COMET procedure for human sperm. It includes automated scoring of comets by a fully integrated high content screening setup that compares well with the most commonly used semi-manual analysis software. Using this method, a cross-sectional study on 123 men showed no significant correlation between sperm concentration and sperm DNA damage, confirming the existence of hidden chromatin damage in men with apparently normal semen characteristics, and a significant correlation between percentage DNA in the tail and percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa. Finally, the use of DNA damage profiles helped to distinguish subjects between and within sperm concentration categories, and allowed a determination of the proportion of highly damaged cells.Limitations, reasons for cautionThe main limitations of the HT-COMET are the high, yet indispensable, investment in an automated liquid handling system and heating block to ensure accuracy, and the availability of an automated plate reading microscope and analysis software.Wider implications of the findingsThis standardized HT-COMET assay offers many advantages, including higher accuracy and evenness due to automation of sensitive steps, a 14.4-fold increase in sample analysis capacity, and an imaging and scoring time of 1 min/well. Overall, HT-COMET offers a decrease in total experimental time of more than 90%. Hence, this assay constitutes a more efficient option to assess sperm chromatin quality, paves the way to using this assay to screen large cohorts, and holds prognostic value for infertile patients.Study funding/competing interestsFunded by the CIHR Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health (IHDCYH; RHF 100625). O.A. is a fellow supported by the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS) and the CIHR Training Program in Reproduction, Early Development, and the Impact on Health (REDIH). B.R. is a James McGill Professor. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Project description:IntroductionThe Semantic Web community provides a common Resource Description Framework (RDF) that allows representation of resources such that they can be linked. To maximize the potential of linked data - machine-actionable interlinked resources on the Web - a certain level of quality of RDF resources should be established, particularly in the biomedical domain in which concepts are complex and high-quality biomedical ontologies are in high demand. However, it is unclear which quality metrics for RDF resources exist that can be automated, which is required given the multitude of RDF resources. Therefore, we aim to determine these metrics and demonstrate an automated approach to assess such metrics of RDF resources.MethodsAn initial set of metrics are identified through literature, standards, and existing tooling. Of these, metrics are selected that fulfil these criteria: (1) objective; (2) automatable; and (3) foundational. Selected metrics are represented in RDF and semantically aligned to existing standards. These metrics are then implemented in an open-source tool. To demonstrate the tool, eight commonly used RDF resources were assessed, including data models in the healthcare domain (HL7 RIM, HL7 FHIR, CDISC CDASH), ontologies (DCT, SIO, FOAF, ORDO), and a metadata profile (GRDDL).ResultsSix objective metrics are identified in 3 categories: Resolvability (1), Parsability (1), and Consistency (4), and represented in RDF. The tool demonstrates that these metrics can be automated, and application in the healthcare domain shows non-resolvable URIs (ranging from 0.3% to 97%) among all eight resources and undefined URIs in HL7 RIM, and FHIR. In the tested resources no errors were found for parsability and the other three consistency metrics for correct usage of classes and properties.ConclusionWe extracted six objective and automatable metrics from literature, as the foundational quality requirements of RDF resources to maximize the potential of linked data. Automated tooling to assess resources has shown to be effective to identify quality issues that must be avoided. This approach can be expanded to incorporate more automatable metrics so as to reflect additional quality dimensions with the assessment tool implementing more metrics.

Project description:Microarray technology provides a powerful tool for defining gene expression profiles of airway epithelium that lend insight into the pathogenesis of human airway disorders. The focus of this study was to establish rigorous quality control parameters to ensure that microarray assessment of the airway epithelium is not confounded by experimental artifact. Samples (total n=223) of trachea, large and small airway epithelium were collected by fiberoptic bronchoscopy of 144 individuals (42 healthy non-smokers, 49 healthy smokers, 11 symptomatic smokers, 22 smokers with lone emphysema with normal spirometry, and 20 smokers with COPD) were processed and hybridized to Affymetrix HG-U133 2.0 Plus microarrays. The pre- and post-chip quality control (QC) criteria established, included: (1) RNA quality, assessed by RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥7.0 using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer software; (2) cRNA transcript integrity, assessed by signal intensity ratio of GAPDH 3' to 5' probe sets ≤3.0; and (3) the multi-chip normalization scaling factor ≤10.0 Of the 223 samples, 213 (95.5%) passed the QC criteria. In a data set of 34 arrays (10 samples failing QC criteria, 24 randomly chosen samples passing QC criteria), correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons of expression levels for 100 housekeeping genes in which at least one array failed the QC criteria were significantly lower (average Pearson r = 0.90 ± 0.04) and more broadly dispersed than correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons between any two arrays that passed the QC criteria (average Pearson r = 0.97 ± 0.01). By using the QC cutoff criteria, the inter-array variability, as assessed by the coefficient of variation in the expression levels for 100 housekeeping genes, was reduced from 35.7% to 21.7%. Based on the aberrant housekeeping gene data generated from samples failing the established QC criteria, we propose that the QC criteria outlined in this study can accurately distinguish high quality from low quality data and can be used to delete poor quality microarray samples before proceeding to higher-order biological analyses and interpretation.

Dataset Information

A simplified approach to human islet quality assessment.

Publications

A simplified approach to human islet quality assessment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets