Dataset Information

Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint library.

ABSTRACT: Structural variants (SVs) are a major source of human genomic variation; however, characterizing them at nucleotide resolution remains challenging. Here we assemble a library of breakpoints at nucleotide resolution from collating and standardizing ~2,000 published SVs. For each breakpoint, we infer its ancestral state (through comparison to primate genomes) and its mechanism of formation (e.g., nonallelic homologous recombination, NAHR). We characterize breakpoint sequences with respect to genomic landmarks, chromosomal location, sequence motifs and physical properties, finding that the occurrence of insertions and deletions is more balanced than previously reported and that NAHR-formed breakpoints are associated with relatively rigid, stable DNA helices. Finally, we demonstrate an approach, BreakSeq, for scanning the reads from short-read sequenced genomes against our breakpoint library to accurately identify previously overlooked SVs, which we then validate by PCR. As new data become available, we expect our BreakSeq approach will become more sensitive and facilitate rapid SV genotyping of personal genomes.

SUBMITTER: Lam HY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2951730 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint library.

Lam Hugo Y K HY Mu Xinmeng Jasmine XJ Stütz Adrian M AM Tanzer Andrea A Cayting Philip D PD Snyder Michael M Kim Philip M PM Korbel Jan O JO Gerstein Mark B MB

Nature biotechnology 20091227 1

Structural variants (SVs) are a major source of human genomic variation; however, characterizing them at nucleotide resolution remains challenging. Here we assemble a library of breakpoints at nucleotide resolution from collating and standardizing ~2,000 published SVs. For each breakpoint, we infer its ancestral state (through comparison to primate genomes) and its mechanism of formation (e.g., nonallelic homologous recombination, NAHR). We characterize breakpoint sequences with respect to genom ...[more]

PMID: 20037582

Similar Datasets

Project description:High-quality genome assemblies and sophisticated algorithms have increased sensitivity for a wide range of variant types, and breakpoint accuracy for structural variants (SVs, ≥ 50 bp) has improved to near basepair precision. Despite these advances, many SVs in unique regions of the genome are subject to systematic bias that affects breakpoint location. This ambiguity leads to less accurate variant comparisons across samples, and it obscures true breakpoint features needed for mechanistic inferences. To understand why SVs are not consistently placed, we reanalyzed 64 phased haplotypes constructed from long-read assemblies released by the Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium (HGSVC). We identified variable breakpoints for 882 SV insertions and 180 SV deletions not anchored in tandem repeats (TRs) or segmental duplications (SDs). While this is unexpectedly high for genome assemblies in unique loci, we find read-based callsets from the same sequencing data yielded 1,566 insertions and 986 deletions with inconsistent breakpoints also not anchored in TRs or SDs. When we investigated causes for breakpoint inaccuracy, we found sequence and assembly errors had minimal impact, but we observed a strong effect of ancestry. We confirmed that polymorphic mismatches and small indels are enriched at shifted breakpoints and that these polymorphisms are generally lost when breakpoints shift. Long tracts of homology, such as SVs mediated by transposable elements, increase the likelihood of imprecise SV calls and the distance they are shifted. Tandem Duplication (TD) breakpoints are the most heavily affected SV class with 14% of TDs placed at different locations across haplotypes. While graph genome methods normalize SV calls across many samples, the resulting breakpoints are sometimes incorrect, highlighting a need to tune graph methods for breakpoint accuracy. The breakpoint inconsistencies we characterize collectively affect ~5% of the SVs called in a human genome and underscore a need for algorithm development to improve SV databases, mitigate the impact of ancestry on breakpoint placement, and increase the value of callsets for investigating mutational processes.

Project description:BackgroundStructural genomic variants (SVs) are prevalent in plant genomes and have played an important role in evolution and domestication, as they constitute a significant source of genomic and phenotypic variability. Nevertheless, most methods in quantitative genetics focusing on crop improvement, such as genomic prediction, consider only Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Deep Learning (DL) is a promising strategy for genomic prediction, but its performance using SVs and SNPs as genetic markers remains unknown.ResultsWe used rice to investigate whether combining SVs and SNPs can result in better trait prediction over SNPs alone and examine the potential advantage of Deep Learning (DL) networks over Bayesian Linear models. Specifically, the performances of BayesC (considering additive effects) and a Bayesian Reproducible Kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression (considering both additive and non-additive effects) were compared to those of two different DL architectures, the Multilayer Perceptron, and the Convolution Neural Network, to explore their prediction ability by using various marker input strategies. We found that exploiting structural and nucleotide variation slightly improved prediction ability on complex traits in 87% of the cases. DL models outperformed Bayesian models in 75% of the studied cases, considering the four traits and the two validation strategies used. Finally, DL systematically improved prediction ability of binary traits against the Bayesian models.ConclusionsOur study reveals that the use of structural genomic variants can improve trait prediction in rice, independently of the methodology used. Also, our results suggest that Deep Learning (DL) networks can perform better than Bayesian models in the prediction of binary traits, and in quantitative traits when the training and target sets are not closely related. This highlights the potential of DL to enhance crop improvement in specific scenarios and the importance to consider SVs in addition to SNPs in genomic selection.

Dataset Information

Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint library.

Publications

Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint library.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets