Dataset Information

Quadratic variance models for adaptively preprocessing SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI) is a proteomics tool for biomarker discovery and other high throughput applications. Previous studies have identified various areas for improvement in preprocessing algorithms used for protein peak detection. Bottom-up approaches to preprocessing that emphasize modeling SELDI data acquisition are promising avenues of research to find the needed improvements in reproducibility.

Results

We studied the properties of the SELDI detector intensity response to matrix only runs. The intensity fluctuations and noise observed can be characterized by a natural exponential family with quadratic variance function (NEF-QVF) class of distributions. These include as special cases many common distributions arising in practice (e.g.- normal, Poisson). Taking this model into account, we present a modified Antoniadis-Sapatinas wavelet denoising algorithm as the core of our preprocessing program, implemented in MATLAB. The proposed preprocessing approach shows superior peak detection sensitivity compared to MassSpecWavelet for false discovery rate (FDR) values less than 25%.

Conclusions

The NEF-QVF detector model requires that certain parameters be measured from matrix only spectra, leaving implications for new experiment design at the trade-off of slightly increased cost. These additional measurements allow our preprocessing program to adapt to changing noise characteristics arising from intralaboratory and across-laboratory factors. With further development, this approach may lead to improved peak prediction reproducibility and nearly automated, high throughput preprocessing of SELDI data.

SUBMITTER: Emanuele VA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2964685 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quadratic variance models for adaptively preprocessing SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data.

Emanuele Vincent A VA Gurbaxani Brian M BM

BMC bioinformatics 20101013

<h4>Background</h4>Surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI) is a proteomics tool for biomarker discovery and other high throughput applications. Previous studies have identified various areas for improvement in preprocessing algorithms used for protein peak detection. Bottom-up approaches to preprocessing that emphasize modeling SELDI data acquisition are promising avenues of research to find the needed improvements in reproducibility.<h4>Results</h4> ...[more]

PMID: 20942945

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMass spectrometry for biological data analysis is an active field of research, providing an efficient way of high-throughput proteome screening. A popular variant of mass spectrometry is SELDI, which is often used to measure sample populations with the goal of developing (clinical) classifiers. Unfortunately, not only is the data resulting from such measurements quite noisy, variance between replicate measurements of the same sample can be high as well. Normalisation of spectra can greatly reduce the effect of this technical variance and further improve the quality and interpretability of the data. However, it is unclear which normalisation method yields the most informative result.ResultsIn this paper, we describe the first systematic comparison of a wide range of normalisation methods, using two objectives that should be met by a good method. These objectives are minimisation of inter-spectra variance and maximisation of signal with respect to class separation. The former is assessed using an estimation of the coefficient of variation, the latter using the classification performance of three types of classifiers on real-world datasets representing two-class diagnostic problems. To obtain a maximally robust evaluation of a normalisation method, both objectives are evaluated over multiple datasets and multiple configurations of baseline correction and peak detection methods. Results are assessed for statistical significance and visualised to reveal the performance of each normalisation method, in particular with respect to using no normalisation. The normalisation methods described have been implemented in the freely available MASDA R-package.ConclusionIn the general case, normalisation of mass spectra is beneficial to the quality of data. The majority of methods we compared performed significantly better than the case in which no normalisation was used. We have shown that normalisation methods that scale spectra by a factor based on the dispersion (e.g., standard deviation) of the data clearly outperform those where a factor based on the central location (e.g., mean) is used. Additional improvements in performance are obtained when these factors are estimated locally, using a sliding window within spectra, instead of globally, over full spectra. The underperforming category of methods using a globally estimated factor based on the central location of the data includes the method used by the majority of SELDI users.

Project description:BackgroundSerum samples of patients with hemorrhagic cerebral infarction (HCI), cerebral infarction (CI), and healthy controls (HCs) were used to screen statistically different protein peaks as potential biomarkers and to establish a decision tree classification model.MethodsThe serum samples from clinically confirmed patients with HCI and CI from November 2018 to October 2019 were collected, along with those of HCs who visited our hospital during the same period. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) with CM10 ProteinChip was used to analyze the differences in serum protein expression profiles of 30 patients with HCI, 32 patients with CI, and 31 HCs in the training group, and a decision tree classification model was established. At the same time, the blind test group (18 patients with HCI, 21 patients with CI, and 17 HCs) was tested by a blind method.ResultsModel 1 was successfully established by software analysis with a mass-to-charge ratio of 3,495.2, 8,941.0, and 15,890.4 as a differential protein peak. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of model 1 in distinguishing HCI from HCs were 86.8%, 87.1%, and 86.9%, respectively. After verification of model 1 by the blind test group, the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.9%, 94.1%, and 91.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of model 2 with a mass-to-charge ratio of 2,941.3 as a differential protein peak were 86.7%, 75.0%, and 80.6%, respectively. After verification of model 2 by the blind test group, the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 90.4%, and 87.2%, respectively.ConclusionsSurface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) and CM10 ProteinChip can be used to screen serum protein markers in patients with HCI. Mass-to-charge ratio of 3,495.2, 8,941.0, 15,890.4, and 2,941.3 may be potential protein biomarkers of HCI and used to distinguish HCI patients from HCs and CI.

Dataset Information

Quadratic variance models for adaptively preprocessing SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data.

Background

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Quadratic variance models for adaptively preprocessing SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets