Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To test the feasibility of a framework for prioritizing new comparative effectiveness research (CER) questions related to management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using practice guidelines and a survey of clinicians.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Participants

Members of the American Glaucoma Society (AGS).

Methods

We restated as an answerable clinical question each recommendation in the 2005 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns (PPPs) regarding the management of POAG. We asked members of the AGS to rank the importance of each clinical question, on a scale of 0 (not important at all) to 10 (very important), using a 2-round Delphi survey conducted online between April and September 2008. Respondents had the option of selecting "no judgment" or "research has already answered this question" to each question in lieu of the 0 to 10 rating. We used the ratings assigned by the Delphi respondents to determine the importance of each clinical question.

Main outcome measures

Ranking of importance of each clinical question.

Results

We derived 45 clinical questions from the POAG PPPs. Of the 620 AGS members invited to participate in the survey, 169 completed the Round 1 survey; 105 of 169 also completed Round 2. We observed 4 response patterns to the individual questions. Nine clinical questions were ranked as the most important: 4 questions on medical intervention, 4 questions on filtering surgery, and 1 question on adjustment of therapy.

Conclusions

Our theoretical model for priority setting for CER questions is a feasible and pragmatic approach that merits testing in other medical settings.

SUBMITTER: Li T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2967722 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma.

Li Tianjing T   Ervin Ann-Margret AM   Scherer Roberta R   Jampel Henry H   Dickersin Kay K  

Ophthalmology 20100830 10


<h4>Objective</h4>To test the feasibility of a framework for prioritizing new comparative effectiveness research (CER) questions related to management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using practice guidelines and a survey of clinicians.<h4>Design</h4>Cross-sectional survey.<h4>Participants</h4>Members of the American Glaucoma Society (AGS).<h4>Methods</h4>We restated as an answerable clinical question each recommendation in the 2005 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patt  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3883875 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6344297 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3171270 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9582001 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4695285 | biostudies-literature
2008-06-12 | E-GEOD-2387 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2019-09-28 | GSE138125 | GEO
2015-08-04 | GSE71639 | GEO
| S-EPMC3207715 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5739069 | biostudies-literature