Dataset Information

The necessity of adjusting tests of protein category enrichment in discovery proteomics.

ABSTRACT: Enrichment tests are used in high-throughput experimentation to measure the association between gene or protein expression and membership in groups or pathways. The Fisher's exact test is commonly used. We specifically examined the associations produced by the Fisher test between protein identification by mass spectrometry discovery proteomics, and their Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments in a large yeast dataset. We found that direct application of the Fisher test is misleading in proteomics due to the bias in mass spectrometry to preferentially identify proteins based on their biochemical properties. False inference about associations can be made if this bias is not corrected. Our method adjusts Fisher tests for these biases and produces associations more directly attributable to protein expression rather than experimental bias.Using logistic regression, we modeled the association between protein identification and GO term assignments while adjusting for identification bias in mass spectrometry. The model accounts for five biochemical properties of peptides: (i) hydrophobicity, (ii) molecular weight, (iii) transfer energy, (iv) beta turn frequency and (v) isoelectric point. The model was fit on 181 060 peptides from 2678 proteins identified in 24 yeast proteomics datasets with a 1% false discovery rate. In analyzing the association between protein identification and their GO term assignments, we found that 25% (134 out of 544) of Fisher tests that showed significant association (q-value ?0.05) were non-significant after adjustment using our model. Simulations generating yeast protein sets enriched for identification propensity show that unadjusted enrichment tests were biased while our approach worked well.

SUBMITTER: Louie B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2995116 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The necessity of adjusting tests of protein category enrichment in discovery proteomics.

Louie Brenton B Higdon Roger R Kolker Eugene E

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20101109 24

<h4>Motivation</h4>Enrichment tests are used in high-throughput experimentation to measure the association between gene or protein expression and membership in groups or pathways. The Fisher's exact test is commonly used. We specifically examined the associations produced by the Fisher test between protein identification by mass spectrometry discovery proteomics, and their Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments in a large yeast dataset. We found that direct application of the Fisher test is mislead ...[more]

PMID: 21068002

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundQuantitative proteomics studies are often used to detect proteins that are differentially expressed across different experimental conditions. Functional enrichment analyses are then typically used to detect annotations, such as biological processes that are significantly enriched among such differentially expressed proteins to provide insights into the molecular impacts of the studied conditions. While common, this analytical pipeline often heavily relies on arbitrary thresholds of significance. However, a functional annotation may be dysregulated in a given experimental condition, while none, or very few of its proteins may be individually considered to be significantly differentially expressed. Such an annotation would therefore be missed by standard approaches.ResultsHerein, we propose a novel graph theory-based method, PIGNON, for the detection of differentially expressed functional annotations in different conditions. PIGNON does not assess the statistical significance of the differential expression of individual proteins, but rather maps protein differential expression levels onto a protein-protein interaction network and measures the clustering of proteins from a given functional annotation within the network. This process allows the detection of functional annotations for which the proteins are differentially expressed and grouped in the network. A Monte-Carlo sampling approach is used to assess the clustering significance of proteins in an expression-weighted network. When applied to a quantitative proteomics analysis of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer, PIGNON detects Gene Ontology terms that are both significantly clustered in a protein-protein interaction network and differentially expressed across different breast cancer subtypes. PIGNON identified functional annotations that are dysregulated and clustered within the network between the HER2+, triple negative and hormone receptor positive subtypes. We show that PIGNON's results are complementary to those of state-of-the-art functional enrichment analyses and that it highlights functional annotations missed by standard approaches. Furthermore, PIGNON detects functional annotations that have been previously associated with specific breast cancer subtypes.ConclusionPIGNON provides an alternative to functional enrichment analyses and a more comprehensive characterization of quantitative datasets. Hence, it contributes to yielding a better understanding of dysregulated functions and processes in biological samples under different experimental conditions.

Dataset Information

The necessity of adjusting tests of protein category enrichment in discovery proteomics.

Publications

The necessity of adjusting tests of protein category enrichment in discovery proteomics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets