Project description:BackgroundThe first choice of an esophageal substitute after esophagectomy for cancer is the stomach. However, the colon must be considered for reconstruction in specific situations. The purpose of this study was to clarify the frequency and clinical features of patients who underwent colon interposition in thoracic esophagectomy and to investigate the postoperative complications and survival.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective case-control study in the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan. Patients who underwent colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed.ResultsEighty-eight patients underwent esophagectomy with colon interposition; 53.2% received preoperative treatment and 52.3% underwent thoracoscopic surgery. Clavien-Dindo grade >III postoperative complications occurred in 42% of the patients; anastomotic leakage was the most common complication, occurring in 26.1% of the cases. Univariate analysis of the factors associated with Clavien-Dindo grade <III complications showed that the period 2015-2020 and totally mechanical Collard anastomosis were significant factors, with odds ratios (OR) of 0.264 and 0.267 (p = 0.00327 and p = 0.00335), respectively. Totally mechanical Collard anastomosis was associated with a lower risk of anastomotic leakage by univariate and multivariate analysis (OR, 0.257, p = 0.00566 and OR, 0.285, p = 0.133, respectively). Three-year overall survival was 54.2%. Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that older age was a risk factor (OR, 1.08) for complications.ConclusionIn colon reconstruction after esophageal cancer resection, totally mechanical Collard anastomosis for cervical anastomosis may reduce the risk of Clavien-Dindo grade >III complications.
Project description:BackgroundThis retrospective study aimed to investigate the short-term surgical outcomes and nutritional status of ileo-colon interposition in patients with esophageal cancer who could not undergo gastric tube reconstruction.MethodsSixty-four patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy with reconstruction using ileo-colon interposition for esophageal cancer at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital between January 2001 and July 2020. Using propensity scores to strictly balance the significant variables, we compared treatment outcomes.ResultsBefore matching, 18 patients had cologastrostomy and 46 patients had colojejunostomy. After matching, we enrolled 34 patients (n = 17 in cologastrostomy group, n = 17 in colojejunostomy group). Median operation time in the cologastrostomy group was significantly shorter than that in the colojejunostomy group (499 min vs. 586 min; P = 0.013). Perforation of the colon graft was observed in three patients (7%) and colon graft necrosis was observed in one patient (2%) in the gastrojejunostomy group. Median body weight change 1 year after surgery in the cologastrostomy group was significantly less than that of the colojejunostomy group (92.9% vs. 88.5%; P = 0.038). Further, median serum total protein level 1 year after surgery in the cologastrostomy group was significantly higher than that of the colojejunostomy group (7.0 g/dL vs. 6.6 g/dL, P = 0.030).ConclusionsSubtotal esophagectomy with reconstruction using ileo-colon interposition is a safe and feasible procedure for the patients with esophageal cancer in whom gastric tubes cannot be used. Cologastrostomy with preservation of the remnant stomach had benefits in the surgical outcomes and the postoperative nutritional status.
Project description:Patients with ureteral defects and salvageable renal units present a challenge in reconstructive urology. Vermiform appendix interposition is an option in the management of mid-ureteral defects that can not be managed by primary ureteroureterostomy. Laparoscopic appendicular interposition ureteroplasty is a technically demanding and an infrequently attempted procedure. We present a video demonstration of laparoscopic appendicular interposition for a 4-cm long right mid-ureteral defect in an elderly male. Laparoscopic appendicular interposition ureteroplasty for mid-ureteral defects can provide good long-term functional outcomes with results comparable to an open approach and has the advantage of reduced morbidity.
Project description:Background Isolated lunocapitate disease is a rare situation. It includes both capitolunate arthritis and osteonecrosis of the capitate head. The management of this pathology is not defined yet. Case Description We treated three patients by resection of the capitate head and interposition of a so-called capitolunate Pi(2) implant (Tornier, BioProfile, Grenoble, France). We reported encouraging results at average follow-up of 4.8 years. Literature Review Several procedures have been reported in this indication. All suffer from lack of follow-up. Four-corner fusion seems to be the most reliable solution at the expense of wrist stiffness. Clinical Relevance case series.
Project description:BackgroundOsteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint is a common condition. Various management options and surgical procedures have been described to treat symptomatic cases. Many systematic reviews examine aspects of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis treatment, although none solely examines the outcomes of trapezial partial resection and interposition arthroplasty in stage II to III patients in detail, yet this technique is of growing interest as surgeons seek more nuanced, tailored approaches for osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.MethodsA systematic review of the thumb carpometacarpal joint hemiresection and interposition arthroplasty was performed with pain assessment as a primary outcome measure and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and reoperation rate as secondary outcome measures. A search was performed between 2004 and 2019 using MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed. Preferred Reporting Items and Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used.ResultsTwenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Pain relief and improved PROMs were described in all the articles using this technique with all the interposition materials. Materials such as polyurethane urea matrix and poly-l/d-lactide scaffold had higher complication rates. Revision rates varied and were highest with the polyurethane urea matrix.ConclusionsThis review shows that hemiresection interposition arthroplasty is a useful technique and provides symptomatic benefit in patients with Eaton-Littler stage II and III osteoarthritis. Revision surgery rates due to persistent pain and instability were higher with the use of implants. Larger and long-term studies of this technique using autologous or more bioinert materials and implants are required to assess duration of symptomatic benefit.
Project description:BackgroundInterposition arthroplasty (IA) is one of the oldest reconstructive options for elbow arthritis and is an alternative to total elbow arthroplasty in young active patients with moderate to severe elbow arthritis. In literature there is very little, if any, mention about relationship of post-operative functional recovery and time. In this study we assess the clinical and functional outcome of interposition arthroplasty using abdominal dermal graft.MethodsStudy was conducted retrospective and prospectively during 2014-15 on 18 elbows of 17 patients (10 females and 7 male) which were operated between 2010 and 2015 for elbow arthritis by interposition arthroplasty using abdominal dermal graft by a single surgeon. Etiologically 10 cases were post-traumatic, 4 cases inflammatory joint disease and 4 cases were post-tubercular. All patients were operated using standard kochers approach and above elbow Plaster of Paris were applied in 90° flexion and mid prone position till suture removal i.e. 2 weeks and range of motion (ROM) exercises started. Post-operatively patients were reviewed on 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months and then yearly. Functional assessments were done using Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).ResultsThe mean age of the patients were 34.33 years (16 years-50 years) and follow-up duration of median 22 months (minimum 12 months and maximum 50 months). Pre-operative the ROM of the patients were 0°-75° with median value of 25° which were significantly improved to 55°-135° with median value of 120° which was statistically significant with p-value of less than 0.01. Preoperative MEPS were 15-70 with median value of 45 which was improved to 85 to 100 with median value of 95 with p-value less than 0.01. Post-operatively 14 elbows (77.8%) has excellent and 4 elbows (22.2%) has good result. 5 (27.7%) elbow has mild instability and in 3 patients has hypertrophic scar over donor site.ConclusionIt's a very cost effective treatment as compared to total elbow arthroplasty. It provides superior functional outcome than other kind of salvageable procedure like arthrodesis and patient's satisfaction is very high after surgery as pain subsided and range of motion improved. Most of the patients returned to their previous occupation by 6 months after surgery.
Project description:Massive rotator cuff tears are a huge challenge for orthopaedic surgeons, as the patients may be in need of multiple operations, even including reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The various repair methods for the rotator cuff, such as partial rotator cuff repair, patch-augmented rotator cuff repair, bridging rotator cuff reconstruction with graft interposition, tendon transfer, and superior capsular reconstruction, have always been the focus of research. During surgical intervention for failed rotator cuff repairs, complexity of tears, poor tissue quality, retained hardware, and adhesions are the problems routinely encountered. In this Technical Note, we describe the technique of interposition grafting using fascia lata autograft to reconstruct the rotator cuff after failed primary repair.