Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Sample size requirements for separating out the effects of combination treatments: randomised controlled trials of combination therapy vs. standard treatment compared to factorial designs for patients with tuberculous meningitis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

In certain diseases clinical experts may judge that the intervention with the best prospects is the addition of two treatments to the standard of care. This can either be tested with a simple randomized trial of combination versus standard treatment or with a 2 x 2 factorial design.

Methods

We compared the two approaches using the design of a new trial in tuberculous meningitis as an example. In that trial the combination of 2 drugs added to standard treatment is assumed to reduce the hazard of death by 30% and the sample size of the combination trial to achieve 80% power is 750 patients. We calculated the power of corresponding factorial designs with one- to sixteen-fold the sample size of the combination trial depending on the contribution of each individual drug to the combination treatment effect and the strength of an interaction between the two.

Results

In the absence of an interaction, an eight-fold increase in sample size for the factorial design as compared to the combination trial is required to get 80% power to jointly detect effects of both drugs if the contribution of the less potent treatment to the total effect is at least 35%. An eight-fold sample size increase also provides a power of 76% to detect a qualitative interaction at the one-sided 10% significance level if the individual effects of both drugs are equal. Factorial designs with a lower sample size have a high chance to be underpowered, to show significance of only one drug even if both are equally effective, and to miss important interactions.

Conclusions

Pragmatic combination trials of multiple interventions versus standard therapy are valuable in diseases with a limited patient pool if all interventions test the same treatment concept, it is considered likely that either both or none of the individual interventions are effective, and only moderate drug interactions are suspected. An adequately powered 2 x 2 factorial design to detect effects of individual drugs would require at least 8-fold the sample size of the combination trial.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN61649292.

SUBMITTER: Wolbers M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3040154 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Sample size requirements for separating out the effects of combination treatments: randomised controlled trials of combination therapy vs. standard treatment compared to factorial designs for patients with tuberculous meningitis.

Wolbers Marcel M   Heemskerk Dorothee D   Chau Tran Thi Hong TT   Yen Nguyen Thi Bich NT   Caws Maxine M   Farrar Jeremy J   Day Jeremy J  

Trials 20110202


<h4>Background</h4>In certain diseases clinical experts may judge that the intervention with the best prospects is the addition of two treatments to the standard of care. This can either be tested with a simple randomized trial of combination versus standard treatment or with a 2 x 2 factorial design.<h4>Methods</h4>We compared the two approaches using the design of a new trial in tuberculous meningitis as an example. In that trial the combination of 2 drugs added to standard treatment is assume  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2019-08-06 | GSE111459 | GEO
| S-EPMC4373880 | biostudies-literature
2011-07-01 | GSE23074 | GEO
2019-08-06 | GSE122377 | GEO
2011-06-30 | E-GEOD-23074 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC6355360 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4916936 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8632769 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7259381 | biostudies-literature
2017-06-10 | GSE83892 | GEO