MADGene: retrieval and processing of gene identifier lists for the analysis of heterogeneous microarray datasets.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Unlabelled
MADGene is a software environment comprising a web-based database and a java application. This platform aims at unifying gene identifiers (ids) and performing gene set analysis. MADGene allows the user to perform inter-conversion of clone and gene ids over a large range of nomenclatures relative to 17 species. We propose a set of 23 functions to facilitate the analysis of gene sets and we give two microarray applications to show how MADGene can be used to conduct meta-analyses.Availability
The MADGene resources are freely available online from http://www.madtools.org, a website dedicated to the analysis and annotation of DNA microarray data.
SUBMITTER: Baron D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3042180 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
MADGene: retrieval and processing of gene identifier lists for the analysis of heterogeneous microarray datasets.
Baron Daniel D Bihouée Audrey A Teusan Raluca R Dubois Emeric E Savagner Frédérique F Steenman Marja M Houlgatte Rémi R Ramstein Gérard G
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20110106 5
<h4>Unlabelled</h4>MADGene is a software environment comprising a web-based database and a java application. This platform aims at unifying gene identifiers (ids) and performing gene set analysis. MADGene allows the user to perform inter-conversion of clone and gene ids over a large range of nomenclatures relative to 17 species. We propose a set of 23 functions to facilitate the analysis of gene sets and we give two microarray applications to show how MADGene can be used to conduct meta-analyses ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:This paper presents an empirical study that aims to explain the relationship between the number of samples and stability of different gene selection techniques for microarray datasets. Unlike other similar studies where number of genes in a ranked gene list is variable, this study uses an alternative approach where stability is observed at different number of samples that are used for gene selection. Three different metrics of stability, including a novel metric in bioinformatics, were used to estimate the stability of the ranked gene lists. Results of this study demonstrate that the univariate selection methods produce significantly more stable ranked gene lists than the multivariate selection methods used in this study. More specifically, thousands of samples are needed for these multivariate selection methods to achieve the same level of stability any given univariate selection method can achieve with only hundreds.
| S-EPMC2896709 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A major challenge in microarray data analysis is the functional interpretation of gene lists. A common approach to address this is over-representation analysis (ORA), which uses the hypergeometric test (or its variants) to evaluate whether a particular functionally defined group of genes is represented more than expected by chance within a gene list. Existing applications of ORA have been largely limited to pre-defined terminologies such as GO and KEGG. We report our explorations of whether ORA can be applied to a wider mining of free-text. We found that a hitherto underappreciated feature of experimentally derived gene lists is that the constituents have substantially more annotation associated with them, as they have been researched upon for a longer period of time. This bias, a result of patterns of research activity within the biomedical community, is a major problem for classical hypergeometric test-based ORA approaches, which cannot account for such bias. We have therefore developed three approaches to overcome this bias, and demonstrate their usability in a wide range of published datasets covering different species. A comparison with existing tools that use GO terms suggests that mining PubMed abstracts can reveal additional biological insight that may not be possible by mining pre-defined ontologies alone.
| S-EPMC2699530 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository at the National Center for Biotechnology Information archives and freely distributes high-throughput molecular abundance data, predominantly gene expression data generated by DNA microarray technology. The database has a flexible design that can handle diverse styles of both unprocessed and processed data in a Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment-supportive infrastructure that promotes fully annotated submissions. GEO currently stores about a billion individual gene expression measurements, derived from over 100 organisms, submitted by over 1500 laboratories, addressing a wide range of biological phenomena. To maximize the utility of these data, several user-friendly web-based interfaces and applications have been implemented that enable effective exploration, query, and visualization of these data at the level of individual genes or entire studies. This chapter describes how data are stored, submission procedures, and mechanisms for data retrieval and query. GEO is publicly accessible at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/.
| S-EPMC1619900 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder with a complex pathophysiology. Given its prevalence, high risk of mortality, early onset, and high levels of disability, researchers have attempted to develop early detection strategies for facilitating timely pharmacological and/or nonpharmacological interventions. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of publicly available gene expression datasets in peripheral tissues in schizophrenia and healthy controls to detect consistent patterns of illness-associated gene expression. We also tested whether our earlier finding of a downregulation of NPTX2 expression in the brain of schizophrenia patients replicated in peripheral tissues. METHODS:We conducted a systematic search in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/) and identified 3 datasets matching our inclusion criteria: GSE62333, GSE18312, and GSE27383. After quality controls, the total sample size was: schizophrenia (n?=?71) and healthy controls (n?=?57) (schizophrenia range: n?=?12-40; healthy controls range: n?=?8-29). RESULTS:The results of the meta-analysis conducted with the GeneMeta package revealed 2 genes with a false discovery rate ?<?0.05: atlastin GTPase 3 (ATL3) (upregulated) and arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase, type B (ALOX15B) (downregulated). The result for ATL3 was confirmed using the weighted Z test method, whereas we found a suggestive signal for ALOX15B (false discovery rate?<?0.10). CONCLUSIONS:These data point to alterations of peripheral expression of ATL3 in schizophrenia, but did not confirm the significant association signal found for NPTX2 in postmortem brain samples. These findings await replication in newly recruited schizophrenia samples as well as complementary analysis of their encoded peptides in blood.
| S-EPMC6403089 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: As the magnitude of the experiment increases, it is common to combine various types of microarrays such as paired and non-paired microarrays from different laboratories or hospitals. Thus, it is important to analyze microarray data together to derive a combined conclusion after accounting for heterogeneity among data sets. One of the main objectives of the microarray experiment is to identify differentially expressed genes among the different experimental groups. We propose the linear mixed effect model for the integrated analysis of the heterogeneous microarray data sets. RESULTS: The proposed linear mixed effect model was illustrated using the data from 133 microarrays collected at three different hospitals. Though simulation studies, we compared the proposed linear mixed effect model approach with the meta-analysis and the ANOVA model approaches. The linear mixed effect model approach was shown to provide higher powers than the other approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The linear mixed effect model has advantages of allowing for various types of covariance structures over ANOVA model. Further, it can handle easily the correlated microarray data such as paired microarray data and repeated microarray data from the same subject.
| S-EPMC3226253 | biostudies-other
Project description:The majority of preclinical biomedical research involves studies of males rather than females. It is thought that researchers have avoided females based on the idea that female traits are more variable than those of males because of cyclic variation in effects of ovarian hormones.To test the assumption of inherently greater female variability, we analyzed 293 microarray datasets measuring gene expression in various tissues of mice and humans, comprising analysis of more than 5 million probes.Meta-analysis showed that on average, male gene expression is slightly more variable than that of females although the difference is small. We also tested if the X chromosome of humans shows greater variability in gene expression in males than in females, as might be expected because of hemizygous exposure of polymorphic X alleles but again found little sex difference.Our analysis supports and extends previous studies reporting no overall greater phenotypic variability in females.
| S-EPMC4640155 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Affymetrix high density oligonucleotide expression arrays are widely used across all fields of biological research for measuring genome-wide gene expression. An important step in processing oligonucleotide microarray data is to produce a single value for the gene expression level of an RNA transcript using one of a growing number of statistical methods. The challenge for the researcher is to decide on the most appropriate method to use to address a specific biological question with a given dataset. Although several research efforts have focused on assessing performance of a few methods in evaluating gene expression from RNA hybridization experiments with different datasets, the relative merits of the methods currently available in the literature for evaluating genome-wide gene expression from Affymetrix microarray data collected from real biological experiments remain actively debated.The present study reports a comprehensive survey of the performance of all seven commonly used methods in evaluating genome-wide gene expression from a well-designed experiment using Affymetrix microarrays. The experiment profiled eight genetically divergent barley cultivars each with three biological replicates. The dataset so obtained confers a balanced and idealized structure for the present analysis. The methods were evaluated on their sensitivity for detecting differentially expressed genes, reproducibility of expression values across replicates, and consistency in calling differentially expressed genes. The number of genes detected as differentially expressed among methods differed by a factor of two or more at a given false discovery rate (FDR) level. Moreover, we propose the use of genes containing single feature polymorphisms (SFPs) as an empirical test for comparison among methods for the ability to detect true differential gene expression on the basis that SFPs largely correspond to cis-acting expression regulators. The PDNN method demonstrated superiority over all other methods in every comparison, whilst the default Affymetrix MAS5.0 method was clearly inferior.A comprehensive assessment of seven commonly used data extraction methods based on an extensive barley Affymetrix gene expression dataset has shown that the PDNN method has superior performance for the detection of differentially expressed genes.
| S-EPMC2442103 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSystems biologists are faced with the difficulty of analyzing results from large-scale studies that profile the activity of many genes, RNAs and proteins, applied in different experiments, under different conditions, and reported in different publications. To address this challenge it is desirable to compare the results from different related studies such as mRNA expression microarrays, genome-wide ChIP-X, RNAi screens, proteomics and phosphoproteomics experiments in a coherent global framework. In addition, linking high-content multilayered experimental results with prior biological knowledge can be useful for identifying functional themes and form novel hypotheses.ResultsWe present Lists2Networks, a web-based system that allows users to upload lists of mammalian genes/proteins onto a server-based program for integrated analysis. The system includes web-based tools to manipulate lists with different set operations, to expand lists using existing mammalian networks of protein-protein interactions, co-expression correlation, or background knowledge co-annotation correlation, as well as to apply gene-list enrichment analyses against many gene-list libraries of prior biological knowledge such as pathways, gene ontology terms, kinase-substrate, microRNA-mRAN, and protein-protein interactions, metabolites, and protein domains. Such analyses can be applied to several lists at once against many prior knowledge libraries of gene-lists associated with specific annotations. The system also contains features that allow users to export networks and share lists with other users of the system.ConclusionsLists2Networks is a user friendly web-based software system expected to significantly ease the computational analysis process for experimental systems biologists employing high-throughput experiments at multiple layers of regulation. The system is freely available at http://www.lists2networks.org.
| S-EPMC2843617 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Numerous feature selection methods have been applied to the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. These include simple fold change, classical t-statistic and moderated t-statistics. Even though these methods return gene lists that are often dissimilar, few direct comparisons of these exist. We present an empirical study in which we compare some of the most commonly used feature selection methods. We apply these to 9 publicly available datasets, and compare, both the gene lists produced and how these perform in class prediction of test datasets. RESULTS: In this study, we compared the efficiency of the feature selection methods; significance analysis of microarrays (SAM), analysis of variance (ANOVA), empirical bayes t-statistic, template matching, maxT, between group analysis (BGA), Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Welch t-statistic, fold change, rank products, and sets of randomly selected genes. In each case these methods were applied to 9 different binary (two class) microarray datasets. Firstly we found little agreement in gene lists produced by the different methods. Only 8 to 21% of genes were in common across all 10 feature selection methods. Secondly, we evaluated the class prediction efficiency of each gene list in training and test cross-validation using four supervised classifiers. CONCLUSION: We report that the choice of feature selection method, the number of genes in the genelist, the number of cases (samples) and the noise in the dataset, substantially influence classification success. Recommendations are made for choice of feature selection. Area under a ROC curve performed well with datasets that had low levels of noise and large sample size. Rank products performs well when datasets had low numbers of samples or high levels of noise. The Empirical bayes t-statistic performed well across a range of sample sizes.
| S-EPMC1544358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOne of the challenges in the analysis of microarray data is to integrate and compare the selected (e.g., differential) gene lists from multiple experiments for common or unique underlying biological themes. A common way to approach this problem is to extract common genes from these gene lists and then subject these genes to enrichment analysis to reveal the underlying biology. However, the capacity of this approach is largely restricted by the limited number of common genes shared by datasets from multiple experiments, which could be caused by the complexity of the biological system itself.ResultsWe now introduce a new Pathway Pattern Extraction Pipeline (PPEP), which extends the existing WPS application by providing a new pathway-level comparative analysis scheme. To facilitate comparing and correlating results from different studies and sources, PPEP contains new interfaces that allow evaluation of the pathway-level enrichment patterns across multiple gene lists. As an exploratory tool, this analysis pipeline may help reveal the underlying biological themes at both the pathway and gene levels. The analysis scheme provided by PPEP begins with multiple gene lists, which may be derived from different studies in terms of the biological contexts, applied technologies, or methodologies. These lists are then subjected to pathway-level comparative analysis for extraction of pathway-level patterns. This analysis pipeline helps to explore the commonality or uniqueness of these lists at the level of pathways or biological processes from different but relevant biological systems using a combination of statistical enrichment measurements, pathway-level pattern extraction, and graphical display of the relationships of genes and their associated pathways as Gene-Term Association Networks (GTANs) within the WPS platform. As a proof of concept, we have used the new method to analyze many datasets from our collaborators as well as some public microarray datasets.ConclusionThis tool provides a new pathway-level analysis scheme for integrative and comparative analysis of data derived from different but relevant systems. The tool is freely available as a Pathway Pattern Extraction Pipeline implemented in our existing software package WPS, which can be obtained at http://www.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/wps/wps_index.php.
| S-EPMC2709625 | biostudies-literature