Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Getting the grip on nonspecific treatment effects: emesis in patients randomized to acupuncture or sham compared to patients receiving standard care.


ABSTRACT: It is not known whether or not delivering acupuncture triggers mechanisms cited as placebo and if acupuncture or sham reduces radiotherapy-induced emesis more than standard care.Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy over abdominal/pelvic regions were randomized to verum (penetrating) acupuncture (n?=?109; 99 provided data) in the alleged antiemetic acupuncture point PC6 or sham acupuncture (n?=?106; 101 provided data) performed with a telescopic non-penetrating needle at a sham point 2-3 times/week during the whole radiotherapy period. The acupuncture cohort was compared to a reference cohort receiving standard care (n?=?62; 62 provided data). The occurrence of emesis in each group was compared after a mean dose of 27 Gray. Nausea and vomiting were experienced during the preceding week by 37 and 8% in the verum acupuncture group, 38 and 7% in the sham acupuncture group and 63 and 15% in the standard care group, respectively. The lower occurrence of nausea in the acupuncture cohort (verum and sham) compared to patients receiving standard care (37% versus 63%, relative risk (RR) 0.6, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.5-0.8) was also true after adjustment for potential confounding factors for nausea (RR 0.8, CI 0.6 to 0.9). Nausea intensity was lower in the acupuncture cohort (78% no nausea, 13% a little, 8% moderate, 1% much) compared to the standard care cohort (52% no nausea, 32% a little, 15% moderate, 2% much) (p?=?0.002). The acupuncture cohort expected antiemetic effects from their treatment (95%). Patients who expected nausea had increased risk for nausea compared to patients who expected low risk for nausea (RR 1.6; Cl 1.2-2.4).Patients treated with verum or sham acupuncture experienced less nausea and vomiting compared to patients receiving standard care, possibly through a general care effect or due to the high level of patient expectancy.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00621660.

SUBMITTER: Enblom A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3063156 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Getting the grip on nonspecific treatment effects: emesis in patients randomized to acupuncture or sham compared to patients receiving standard care.

Enblom Anna A   Lekander Mats M   Hammar Mats M   Johnsson Anna A   Onelöv Erik E   Ingvar Martin M   Steineck Gunnar G   Börjeson Sussanne S  

PloS one 20110323 3


<h4>Background</h4>It is not known whether or not delivering acupuncture triggers mechanisms cited as placebo and if acupuncture or sham reduces radiotherapy-induced emesis more than standard care.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy over abdominal/pelvic regions were randomized to verum (penetrating) acupuncture (n = 109; 99 provided data) in the alleged antiemetic acupuncture point PC6 or sham acupuncture (n = 106; 101 provided data) performed with a te  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3654763 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8095030 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7478674 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4960666 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2794486 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3663829 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA549759 | ENA
| S-EPMC9255688 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8247886 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6347816 | biostudies-literature