Dataset Information

Upper airway structure and body fat composition in obese children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale

Mechanisms leading to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in obese children are not well understood.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to determine anatomical risk factors associated with OSAS in obese children as compared with obese control subjects without OSAS.

Methods

Magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the size of upper airway structure, and body fat composition. Paired analysis was used to compare between groups. Mixed effects regression models and conditional multiple logistic regression models were used to determine whether body mass index (BMI) Z-score was an effect modifier of each anatomic characteristic as it relates to OSAS.

Measurements and main results

We studied 22 obese subjects with OSAS (12.5 ± 2.8 yr; BMI Z-score, 2.4 ± 0.4) and 22 obese control subjects (12.3 ± 2.9 yr; BMI Z-score, 2.3 ± 0.3). As compared with control subjects, subjects with OSAS had a smaller oropharynx (P < 0.05) and larger adenoid (P < 0.01), tonsils (P < 0.05), and retropharyngeal nodes (P < 0.05). The size of lymphoid tissues correlated with severity of OSAS whereas BMI Z-score did not have a modifier effect on these tissues. Subjects with OSAS demonstrated increased size of parapharyngeal fat pads (P < 0.05) and abdominal visceral fat (P < 0.05). The size of these tissues did not correlate with severity of OSAS and BMI Z-score did not have a modifier effect on these tissues.

Conclusions

Upper airway lymphoid hypertrophy is significant in obese children with OSAS. The lack of correlation of lymphoid tissue size with obesity suggests that this hypertrophy is caused by other mechanisms. Although the parapharyngeal fat pads and abdominal visceral fat are larger in obese children with OSAS we could not find a direct association with severity of OSAS or with obesity.

SUBMITTER: Arens R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3081285 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Adenotonsillar hypertrophy is an important cause of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. However, residual OSA and abnormal polysomnographic findings have been reported in up to 75% of cases after adenotonsillectomy. Other anatomical and functional factors that influence upper airway structures, including the lateral pharyngeal wall, have rarely been studied in children with OSA. Objective:To determine whether the upper airway structures can be evaluated using head and neck ultrasonography and if there is an association between the ultrasonographic measurements for these structures and severity of OSA seen on polysomnography in children. Design, Setting, and Participants:Prospective, single-center, observational study of 82 children younger than 18 years with a diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (20 with primary snoring, 62 with OSA, as determined by the apnea-hypopnea index) and admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital for adenotonsillectomy. Exposures:Ultrasonography and polysomnography. Main Outcomes and Measures:Ultrasonographic measurements of upper airway structures. Results:Of the 82 children studied, 62 (76%) were boys; mean (SD) age, 7.7 (6.2). There was no significant difference found in tonsillar dimensions or volume between the children with OSA and those with primary snoring. However, the mean (SD) total lateral pharyngeal wall and the total neck thicknesses at the retropalatal level were both greater in children with OSA than in those with primary snoring at rest (24.9 [4.4] mm vs 21.3 [2.6] mm; difference, 3.61 mm; 95% CI of difference, 1.48-5.74 mm for lateral pharyngeal wall; and 59.9 [14.4] mm vs 49.9 [11.2] mm; difference, 10.9 mm, 95% CI of difference, 3.8-17.9 mm for the total neck). Conclusions and Relevance:Estimated tonsillar volume measured using ultrasonography had no relationship with the apnea-hypopnea index in childhood sleep-disordered breathing. However, the lateral pharyngeal wall was significantly thicker in children with OSA than in those with primary snoring at rest.

Project description:Study objectivesUpper airway stimulation (UAS) is an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea that must be activated nightly. Although the implanted device offsets the mask- or pressure-related side effects often associated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy, some UAS recipients do not use the therapy consistently. This study qualitatively explored factors associated with UAS usage in obstructive sleep apnea patients.MethodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 24 obstructive sleep apnea patients who received UAS treatment. Twelve patients were categorized as high users with mean usage of ≥ 4 hours/night and 12 were categorized as low users with < 4 hours/night or nonuse. Interviews explored patients' experiences regarding barriers and facilitators to UAS use and their advice for new UAS recipients. Demographic and clinical data including the Insomnia Severity Index and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale were collected.ResultsCompared to high users, low users had higher levels of insomnia (mean Insomnia Severity Index: 3.6 vs 15.2, respectively) and anxiety (mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale: 3.4 vs 6.9). High users reported more positive experiences with UAS treatment, such as improvements in symptoms and convenience of treatment, as facilitators of use. Low users tended to focus on the negative aspects of treatment, particularly stimulation-related discomfort and associated sleep disturbance.ConclusionsInsomnia with or without anxiety contributes to differing patient-reported experiences in high vs low user groups, with increased insomnia symptoms among low users. Improved understanding of the specific barrier and facilitators of UAS adherence may drive better long-term use and more personalized management strategies, including concomitant insomnia treatment.Clinical trials registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Stimulation Therapy for Apnea: Reporting Thoughts (START); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04768543; Identifier: NCT04768543.CitationLuyster FS, Ni Q, Lee K, et al. Factors affecting obstructive sleep apnea patients' use of upper airway stimulation treatment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2207-2215.