Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How words can and cannot be learned by observation.


ABSTRACT: Three experiments explored how words are learned from hearing them across contexts. Adults watched 40-s videotaped vignettes of parents uttering target words (in sentences) to their infants. Videos were muted except for a beep or nonsense word inserted where each "mystery word" was uttered. Participants were to identify the word. Exp. 1 demonstrated that most (90%) of these natural learning instances are quite uninformative, whereas a small minority (7%) are highly informative, as indexed by participants' identification accuracy. Preschoolers showed similar information sensitivity in a shorter experimental version. Two further experiments explored how cross-situational information helps, by manipulating the serial ordering of highly informative vignettes in five contexts. Response patterns revealed a learning procedure in which only a single meaning is hypothesized and retained across learning instances, unless disconfirmed. Neither alternative hypothesized meanings nor details of past learning situations were retained. These findings challenge current models of cross-situational learning which assert that multiple meaning hypotheses are stored and cross-tabulated via statistical procedures. Learners appear to use a one-trial "fast-mapping" procedure, even under conditions of referential uncertainty.

SUBMITTER: Medina TN 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3107260 | biostudies-literature | 2011 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

How words can and cannot be learned by observation.

Medina Tamara Nicol TN   Snedeker Jesse J   Trueswell John C JC   Gleitman Lila R LR  

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20110516 22


Three experiments explored how words are learned from hearing them across contexts. Adults watched 40-s videotaped vignettes of parents uttering target words (in sentences) to their infants. Videos were muted except for a beep or nonsense word inserted where each "mystery word" was uttered. Participants were to identify the word. Exp. 1 demonstrated that most (90%) of these natural learning instances are quite uninformative, whereas a small minority (7%) are highly informative, as indexed by par  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8696684 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4357220 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9245153 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5866766 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7236449 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5226804 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6751324 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8244097 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6634368 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3626512 | biostudies-literature