Dataset Information

Retinal vein occlusion and macular edema - critical evaluation of the clinical value of ranibizumab.

ABSTRACT: Retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) constitute the second most common cause of retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy, with a prevalence of between 1% and 2% in persons older than 40 years of age. Despite the existence of numerous potential therapeutic options, none is entirely satisfactory, and many patients with RVO suffer irreversible visual loss. Fortunately however, the recent introduction of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis(®), Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) and bevacizumab (Avastin(®), Genentech), offers a potentially new treatment approach for clinicians managing this disorder. The results of the BRAVO and CRUISE trials have provided the first definitive evidence for the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab in the treatment of RVO. As a result, ranibizumab has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of RVO-associated macular edema. In this review, we provide a critical evaluation of clinical trial data for the safety and efficacy of ranibizumab, and address unresolved issues in the management of this disorder.

SUBMITTER: Keane PA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3130914 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Retinal vein occlusion and macular edema - critical evaluation of the clinical value of ranibizumab.

Keane Pearse A PA Sadda Srinivas R SR

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 20110609

Retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) constitute the second most common cause of retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy, with a prevalence of between 1% and 2% in persons older than 40 years of age. Despite the existence of numerous potential therapeutic options, none is entirely satisfactory, and many patients with RVO suffer irreversible visual loss. Fortunately however, the recent introduction of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis(®), Gen ...[more]

PMID: 21750610

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate spectral-domain (SD)-OCT features associated with baseline vision and visual outcomes in the prospective, multicenter Study Evaluating Dosing Regimens for Treatment with Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injections in Subjects with Macular Edema following Retinal Vein Occlusion (SHORE).DesignPost hoc analysis of prospective clinical trial data.ParticipantsTwo hundred two participants in the 15-month, phase 4 SHORE study comparing monthly versus pro re nata ranibizumab after 7 monthly doses in eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) with macular edema.MethodsBaseline SD-OCT images were assessed for (1) central subfield thickness (CST); (2) presence of vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction, or epiretinal membrane; (3) presence, location, and amount of intraretinal fluid or subretinal fluid (SRF); (4) presence, location, and amount of hyperreflective foci (HF); (5) disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL); and (6) disruption of external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid zone (EZ), and interdigitation zone (IZ). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of these features with baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in BCVA after 7 monthly ranibizumab injections.Main outcome measuresAssociation of SD-OCT features with baseline BCVA and change in BCVA after 7 monthly ranibizumab injections.ResultsBefore therapy, worse baseline BCVA was associated with ERM presence (P = 0.0045), thicker SRF (P = 0.0006), larger intraretinal cysts (P = 0.0015), and higher percentage of DRIL (P < 0.0001), percentage of ELM disruption (P < 0.0001), percentage of EZ disruption (P = 0.0003), and percentage of IZ disruption (P = 0.0018). In multivariate models, only percentage of ELM disruption independently impacted baseline BCVA (P < 0.0001). After 7 monthly ranibizumab injections, mean BCVA improved by 18.3±12.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in treated eyes. The only factors independently associated with BCVA gain after 7 monthly ranibizumab treatments were younger age (P < 0.0001) and worse baseline BCVA (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsAlthough SD-OCT features may be associated with presenting vision in eyes with macular edema and RVO, most eyes treated with ranibizumab achieve substantial vision gains, and only older age and better baseline BCVA limited visual improvements.

Project description:Importance:The comparative clinical effectiveness of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab for the management of macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is unclear. Objective:To determine whether intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab results in a noninferior mean change in vision at 100 weeks for eyes with CRVO-related macular edema. Design, Setting, and Participants:This prospective, 3-arm, double-masked, randomized noninferiority trial (Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion [LEAVO] Study) took place from December 12, 2014, through December 16, 2016, at 44 UK National Health Service ophthalmology departments. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years or older, visual impairment due to CRVO-related macular edema of less than 12 months with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score (approximate Snellen equivalent) in the study eye between 19 (20/400) and 78 (20/32), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging central subfield thickness of 320 ?m or greater. Data were analyzed from March 4, 2019, to April 26, 2019. Interventions:Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) (n?=?155), aflibercept (2.0 mg/0.05 mL) (n?=?154), or bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) (n?=?154) for 100 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures:Adjusted mean change in BCVA in the study eye at 100 weeks wherein noninferiority was concluded if the lower bounds of the 95% CI of both the intention-to-treat and the per protocol analyses were above -5 letters. Results:Of 463 participants, 265 (57.2%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 69.1 (13.0) years. The mean (SD) gain in BCVA letter score was 12.5 (21.1) for ranibizumab, 15.1 (18.7) for aflibercept, and 9.8 (21.4) for bevacizumab at 100 weeks. Aflibercept was noninferior to ranibizumab (intention-to-treat-adjusted mean BCVA difference, 2.23 letters; 95% CI, -2.17 to 6.63 letters; P?<?.001). Bevacizumab was not noninferior to ranibizumab (intention-to-treat-adjusted mean BCVA difference, -1.73 letters; 95% CI, -6.12 to 2.67 letters; P?=?.07). The per protocol analysis conclusions were similar. Fewer mean injections were given in the aflibercept group (10.0) than in the ranibizumab (11.8) group (mean difference at 100 weeks, -1.9; 95% CI, -2.9 to -0.8). Conclusions and Relevance:Mean changes in vision after treatment of macular edema due to CRVO were no worse using aflibercept compared with ranibizumab. Mean changes in vision using bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab were inconclusive regarding vision outcomes (ie, the change in visual acuity from baseline, on average, may be worse or may not be worse when using bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab). Trial Registration:ISRCTN13623634.

Project description:IntroductionRanibizumab and aflibercept are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents licensed for the treatment of visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The aim of this study was to estimate, from a UK healthcare payer's perspective, the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab versus aflibercept in this indication.MethodsA Markov model was used to simulate the outcomes and costs of treating BRVO. Patient baseline characteristics and efficacy data for ranibizumab were obtained from the BRAVO trial. The relative efficacy of aflibercept was derived from a published network meta-analysis. Injection frequencies were derived from ranibizumab and aflibercept studies included in the network meta-analysis. Health states were defined by increments of 10 letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Patients could gain or lose a maximum of two health states between cycles. The first cycle was 6 months, followed by monthly cycles. Different utility values were assigned to the better-seeing and worse-seeing eyes based on BCVA. A 2-year treatment time frame and a lifetime time horizon were used. Future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the model.ResultsThe lifetime cost per patient treated was £15,273 with ranibizumab and £17,347 with aflibercept. Ranibizumab was dominant over aflibercept, producing incremental health gains of 0.0120 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost savings of £2074. Net monetary benefit for ranibizumab at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY was £2314. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust to variations in model parameters.ConclusionsRanibizumab provides greater health gains at a lower overall cost than aflibercept in the treatment of visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to BRVO. Ranibizumab is therefore cost-effective from a UK healthcare payer's perspective.FundingNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Project description:BACKGROUND:It is not clear whether macular laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can reduce the number of anti-VEGF injections in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Our study aimed to investigate the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab with or without macular laser for ME secondary to BRVO and its associated number of anti-VEGF injections. METHODS:This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, monocentric trial.80 patients were enrolled and 64 patients fulfilled the study requirements. All patients received a minimum of 3 initial monthly ranibizumab injections, pro re nata (PRN) dosing thereafter VA and CRT stabilization criteria-driven PRN treatment. Laser was given 7?days after third ranibizumab injection in ranibizumab with laser group. The follow-up time of this study was 1 year. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement, central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction and number of injections of patients were compared between two groups. T-test, non-parametric Wilcoxon test and chis-square tests were adopted for between-group comparisons. RESULTS:Thirty patients received intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5?mg alone and 34 patients received intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5?mg with macular laser. At 52?week, BCVA increased significantly and CRT decreased significantly in both groups (P?<?0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BCVA improvement with baseline BCVA adjusted (p?=?0.5226), and in the CRT reduction (P?=?0.4552) between two groups after 52?weeks. There was also no significant difference in the number of injections between the two groups. (P?=?0.0756). There was also no significant difference between ischemic and non-ischemic groups in BCVA improvement, CRT reduction and number of injections (P?>?0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Our study suggests that ranibizumab combined with macular laser is effective in the treatment of ME secondary to BRVO after 1 year of treatment with 3?+?PRN regimen. However, combination of macular grid photocoagulation showed no beneficial anatomical or functional effect during follow-up period, nor did it reduce the number of ranibizumab injections, either in ischemic group or non-ischemic group. We suggest that there is no need to combine macular grid photocoagulation in the treatment of ME secondary to BRVO in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinical Trials NCT03054766. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov.Prospectively registered.

Dataset Information

Retinal vein occlusion and macular edema - critical evaluation of the clinical value of ranibizumab.

Publications

Retinal vein occlusion and macular edema - critical evaluation of the clinical value of ranibizumab.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure