Project description:BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric cancer results from a combination of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection, exposure to dietary carcinogens, and predisposing genetic make-up. Because the role of these factors in gastric carcinogenesis cannot be determined readily in human beings, the present study examined the role of an oral carcinogen and H pylori infection in rhesus monkeys. METHODS: Gastroscopies were performed in 23 monkeys assigned to 4 groups: controls; nitrosating carcinogen ethyl-nitro-nitrosoguanidine administration alone; and inoculation of a virulent H pylori strain alone (H), or in combination with ethyl-nitro-nitrosoguanidine (EH). Follow-up gastroscopies and biopsies were performed at 3-month intervals for 5 years for pathologic and molecular studies. RESULTS: Postinoculation, H and EH groups showed persistent infection and antral gastritis. Starting at 2 and 5 years, respectively, gastric intestinal metaplasia and intraepithelial neoplasia developed in 3 EH monkeys but in no other groups. Transcriptional analysis of biopsies at 5 years revealed group-specific expression profiles, with striking changes in EH monkeys, plus a neoplasia-specific expression profile characterized by changes in multiple cancer-associated genes. Importantly, this neoplastic profile was evident in nonneoplastic mucosa, suggesting that the identified genes may represent markers preceding cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric intraglandular neoplasia is induced in primates when H pylori infection is associated with consumption of a carcinogen similar to the nitrosaminesfound in pickled vegetables, suggesting that H pylori and the carcinogen synergistically induce gastric neoplasia in primates. Monkey arrays used for analysis of the affect of Helicobacter pylori and diet on development of gastric cancer. Each RNA was hybridized against a common reference. Biopsy numbers represent the following in terms of descriptions used in publication of the paper... Each set of numbers/descriptions is organized in the following order: Biopsy#; Monkey#; Group Code on Fig 5 Biopsy #4674; AB24; E; E1 Biopsy #4684; 16G; E; E2 Biopsy #4716; 89G; H; H1 Biopsy #4724; 54H; H; H2 Biopsy #4720; 20G; H; H3 Biopsy #4710; 92F; C; C1 Biopsy #4714; 26G; C; C2 Biopsy #4712; 92G; C; C3 Biopsy #4726; 08G; H; H4 Biopsy #4722; 57G; H; H5 Biopsy #4718; 85G; H; H6 Biopsy #4694; 48H; HE NON; HE1 Biopsy #4686; 59H; HE NON; HE2 Biopsy #4690; 81G; HE NEO; HE3 Biopsy #4696; 36G; HE NEO; HE4 Biopsy #4692; 63G; HE NEO; HE5 Biopsy #4680; 76G; E; E3 Biopsy #4682; 52G; E; E4 Biopsy #4678; 15G; E; E5 Biopsy #4676; 93G; E; E6 Biopsy #4688; 47H; HE NON; HE6 A pathogenicity experiment design type is where an infective agent such as a bacterium, virus, protozoan, fungus etc. infects a host organism(s) and the infective agent is assayed. Infection: Rhesus monkeys were infected with H. pylori (+/-) Compound Based Treatment: Rhesus monkeys were treated with ENNG (N-ethyl-N-nitrosoguanidine) (+/-) pathogenicity_design

Project description:BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric cancer results from a combination of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection, exposure to dietary carcinogens, and predisposing genetic make-up. Because the role of these factors in gastric carcinogenesis cannot be determined readily in human beings, the present study examined the role of an oral carcinogen and H pylori infection in rhesus monkeys. METHODS: Gastroscopies were performed in 23 monkeys assigned to 4 groups: controls; nitrosating carcinogen ethyl-nitro-nitrosoguanidine administration alone; and inoculation of a virulent H pylori strain alone (H), or in combination with ethyl-nitro-nitrosoguanidine (EH). Follow-up gastroscopies and biopsies were performed at 3-month intervals for 5 years for pathologic and molecular studies. RESULTS: Postinoculation, H and EH groups showed persistent infection and antral gastritis. Starting at 2 and 5 years, respectively, gastric intestinal metaplasia and intraepithelial neoplasia developed in 3 EH monkeys but in no other groups. Transcriptional analysis of biopsies at 5 years revealed group-specific expression profiles, with striking changes in EH monkeys, plus a neoplasia-specific expression profile characterized by changes in multiple cancer-associated genes. Importantly, this neoplastic profile was evident in nonneoplastic mucosa, suggesting that the identified genes may represent markers preceding cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric intraglandular neoplasia is induced in primates when H pylori infection is associated with consumption of a carcinogen similar to the nitrosaminesfound in pickled vegetables, suggesting that H pylori and the carcinogen synergistically induce gastric neoplasia in primates. Monkey arrays used for analysis of the affect of Helicobacter pylori and diet on development of gastric cancer. Each RNA was hybridized against a common reference. Biopsy numbers represent the following in terms of descriptions used in publication of the paper... Each set of numbers/descriptions is organized in the following order: Biopsy#; Monkey#; Group Code on Fig 5 Biopsy #4674; AB24; E; E1 Biopsy #4684; 16G; E; E2 Biopsy #4716; 89G; H; H1 Biopsy #4724; 54H; H; H2 Biopsy #4720; 20G; H; H3 Biopsy #4710; 92F; C; C1 Biopsy #4714; 26G; C; C2 Biopsy #4712; 92G; C; C3 Biopsy #4726; 08G; H; H4 Biopsy #4722; 57G; H; H5 Biopsy #4718; 85G; H; H6 Biopsy #4694; 48H; HE NON; HE1 Biopsy #4686; 59H; HE NON; HE2 Biopsy #4690; 81G; HE NEO; HE3 Biopsy #4696; 36G; HE NEO; HE4 Biopsy #4692; 63G; HE NEO; HE5 Biopsy #4680; 76G; E; E3 Biopsy #4682; 52G; E; E4 Biopsy #4678; 15G; E; E5 Biopsy #4676; 93G; E; E6 Biopsy #4688; 47H; HE NON; HE6 A pathogenicity experiment design type is where an infective agent such as a bacterium, virus, protozoan, fungus etc. infects a host organism(s) and the infective agent is assayed. Infection: Rhesus monkeys were infected with H. pylori (+/-) Compound Based Treatment: Rhesus monkeys were treated with ENNG (N-ethyl-N-nitrosoguanidine) (+/-)

Project description:BackgroundCan non-human animals comprehend and employ symbols? The most convincing empirical evidence comes from language-trained apes, but little is known about this ability in monkeys. Tokens can be regarded as symbols since they are inherently non-valuable objects that acquire an arbitrarily assigned value upon exchange with an experimenter. Recent evidence suggested that capuchin monkeys, which diverged from the human lineage 35 million years ago, can estimate, represent and combine token quantities. A fundamental and open question is whether monkeys can reason about symbols in ways similar to how they reason about real objects.Methodology/principal findingsHere we examined this broad question in the context of economic choice behavior. Specifically, we assessed whether, in a symbolic context, capuchins' preferences satisfy transitivity--a fundamental trait of rational decision-making. Given three options A, B and C, transitivity holds true if A > or = B, B > or = C and A > or = C (where > or = indicates preference). In this study, we trained monkeys to exchange three types of tokens for three different foods. We then compared choices monkeys made between different types of tokens with choices monkeys made between the foods. Qualitatively, capuchins' preferences revealed by the way of tokens were similar to those measured with the actual foods. In particular, when choosing between tokens, monkeys displayed strict economic preferences and their choices satisfied transitivity. Quantitatively, however, values measured by the way of tokens differed systematically from those measured with the actual foods. In particular, for any pair of foods, the relative value of the preferred food increased when monkeys chose between the corresponding tokens.Conclusions/significanceThese results indicate that indeed capuchins are capable of treating tokens as symbols. However, as they do so, capuchins experience the cognitive burdens imposed by symbolic representation.

Dataset Information

Experimental gastric carcinogenesis in Cebus apella nonhuman primates.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets