Dataset Information

Lung cancer treatment costs, including patient responsibility, by disease stage and treatment modality, 1992 to 2003.

ABSTRACT: The objective of this analysis was to estimate costs for lung cancer care and evaluate trends in the share of treatment costs that are the responsibility of Medicare beneficiaries.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 1991-2003 for 60,231 patients with lung cancer were used to estimate monthly and patient-liability costs for clinical phases of lung cancer (prediagnosis, staging, initial, continuing, and terminal), stratified by treatment, stage, and non-small- versus small-cell lung cancer. Lung cancer-attributable costs were estimated by subtracting each patient's own prediagnosis costs. Costs were estimated as the sum of Medicare reimbursements (payments from Medicare to the service provider), co-insurance reimbursements, and patient-liability costs (deductibles and "co-payments" that are the patient's responsibility). Costs and patient-liability costs were fit with regression models to compare trends by calendar year, adjusting for age at diagnosis.The monthly treatment costs for a 72-year-old patient, diagnosed with lung cancer in 2000, in the first 6 months ranged from $2687 (no active treatment) to $9360 (chemo-radiotherapy); costs varied by stage at diagnosis and histologic type. Patient liability represented up to 21.6% of care costs and increased over the period 1992-2003 for most stage and treatment categories, even when care costs decreased or remained unchanged. The greatest monthly patient liability was incurred by chemo-radiotherapy patients, which ranged from $1617 to $2004 per month across cancer stages.Costs for lung cancer care are substantial, and Medicare is paying a smaller proportion of the total cost over time.

SUBMITTER: Cipriano LE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3150743 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Lung cancer treatment costs, including patient responsibility, by disease stage and treatment modality, 1992 to 2003.

Cipriano Lauren E LE Romanus Dorothy D Earle Craig C CC Neville Bridget A BA Halpern Elkan F EF Gazelle G Scott GS McMahon Pamela M PM

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 20110101 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>The objective of this analysis was to estimate costs for lung cancer care and evaluate trends in the share of treatment costs that are the responsibility of Medicare beneficiaries.<h4>Methods</h4>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 1991-2003 for 60,231 patients with lung cancer were used to estimate monthly and patient-liability costs for clinical phases of lung cancer (prediagnosis, staging, initial, continuing, and terminal), stratified ...[more]

PMID: 21211485

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDetailed cost estimates are not widely available for esophageal cancer. Our study estimates phase-specific costs for esophageal cancer by age, year, histology, stage, and treatment for older patients in the United States and compares these costs within stage and treatment modalities.MethodsWe identified 8061 esophageal cancer patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database for years 1998-2013. Total, cancer-attributable, and patient-liability costs were calculated based on separate phases of care-staging (or surgery), initial, continuing, and terminal. We estimated costs by treatment modality within stage and phase for esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma separately. We fit linear regression models using log transformation to determine cost by age and calendar year. All costs are reported in 2018 US dollars.ResultsOverall, mean (95% CI) monthly total cost estimates were high during the staging ($8953 [$8385-$9485]) and initial phases ($7731 [$7492-$7970]), decreased over the continuing phase ($2984 [$2814-$3154]), and increased substantially during the 6-month terminal phase ($18 150 [$17 211-$19 089]). This pattern of high staging and initial phase costs, decreasing continuing phase costs, and increasing terminal phase costs was seen in all stages. The highest staging costs were in stages III ($9249, $8025-$10 474) and II ($9171, $7642-$10 699). The highest initial phase cost was in stage IV, $9263 ($8758-49 768), the lowest continuing phase cost was in stage I, $2338 ($2160-$2517), and the highest terminal phase costs were in stages II ($20 533, $17 772-$23 293) and III ($20 599, $18 268-$22 929). The linear regression models showed that cancer-attributable costs remained stable over the study period and were unaffected by age for most histology, stage, and treatment modality subgroups.ConclusionsOur estimates demonstrate that esophageal cancer costs can vary widely by histology, stage, and treatment. These cost estimates can be used to guide future resource allocation for esophageal cancer care and research.

Project description:ImportanceCombined-modality therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy plays a crucial role in the upfront treatment of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but there may be barriers to utilization in the United States.ObjectiveTo estimate utilization rates and factors associated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy delivery for limited-stage SCLC using the National Cancer Database.Design, setting, and participantsAnalysis of initial management of all limited-stage SCLC cases from 2004 through 2013 in the National Cancer Database.Main outcomes and measuresUtilization rates of chemotherapy and radiation therapy at time of initial treatment. Multivariable analysis identified independent clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with utilization and overall survival.ResultsA total of 70 247 cases met inclusion criteria (55.3% female; median age, 68 y [range, 19-90 y]). Initial treatment was 55.5% chemotherapy and radiation therapy, 20.5% chemotherapy alone, 3.5% radiation therapy alone, and 20.0% neither (0.5% not reported). Median survival was 18.2 (95% CI, 17.9-18.4), 10.5 (95% CI, 10.3-10.7), 8.3 (95% CI, 7.7-8.8), and 3.7 (95% CI, 3.5-3.8) months, respectively. Being uninsured was associated with a lower likelihood of both chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75; P < .001) and radiation therapy (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.85; P < .001) administration on multivariable analysis. Medicare/Medicaid insurance had no impact on chemotherapy use, whereas Medicaid (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87; P < .001) and Medicare (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91; P < .001) were independently associated with a lower likelihood of radiation therapy delivery. Lack of health insurance (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26; P < .001), Medicaid (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.21-1.32; P < .001), and Medicare (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.15; P < .001) coverage were independently associated with shorter survival on adjusted analysis, while chemotherapy (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.54-0.57; P < .001) and radiation therapy (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.60-0.63; P < .001) were associated with a survival benefit.Conclusions and relevanceSubstantial proportions of patients documented in a major US cancer registry did not receive radiation therapy or chemotherapy as part of initial treatment for limited-stage SCLC, which, in turn, was associated with poor survival. Lack of radiation therapy delivery was uniquely associated with government insurance coverage, suggesting a need for targeted access improvement in this population. Additional work will be necessary to conclusively define exact population patterns, specific treatment deficiencies, and causative factors leading to heterogeneous care delivery.

Dataset Information

Lung cancer treatment costs, including patient responsibility, by disease stage and treatment modality, 1992 to 2003.

Publications

Lung cancer treatment costs, including patient responsibility, by disease stage and treatment modality, 1992 to 2003.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets