Dataset Information

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fosaprepitant dimeglumine.

ABSTRACT: Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common complication in the treatment of patients with cancer. The introduction of the first in class neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant provided additive control on CINV in combination to existing antiemetics. Due to formulation issues, aprepitant is only available for oral administration. Fosaprepitant, a prodrug of aprepitant, was introduced to the market in 2008 as an intravenous bioequivalent to aprepitant.This review examines the chemical development of fosaprepitant, its pharmacokinetic properties, approved uses and potential applications.The reader will get up-to-date information on the pharmacology and clinical uses of fosaprepitant. Clinical studies have demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of aprepitant 125 mg to fosaprepitant 115 mg, as well as comparable efficacy in prevention of acute and delayed emesis following the first day of chemotherapy regimens.Fosaprepitant is an intravenous prodrug of aprepitant that offers a new alternative to patients with CINV. Currently, fosaprepitant can substitute oral aprepitant in day 1 of a 3-day regimen. Current studies show that a single-day fosaprepitant regimen is also bioequivalent to the 3-day aprepitant regimen; this could significantly simplify the care for CINV patients in the future.

SUBMITTER: Colon-Gonzalez F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3155701 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fosaprepitant dimeglumine.

Colon-Gonzalez Francheska F Kraft Walter K WK

Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology 20101001 10

<h4>Importance of the field</h4>Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common complication in the treatment of patients with cancer. The introduction of the first in class neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant provided additive control on CINV in combination to existing antiemetics. Due to formulation issues, aprepitant is only available for oral administration. Fosaprepitant, a prodrug of aprepitant, was introduced to the market in 2008 as an intravenous bioequivalent to apr ...[more]

PMID: 20795794

Similar Datasets

Project description:During a recent multi-center trial assessing gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the Food and Drug Administration announced a risk of nephrogenic sclerosing fibrosis in patients with renal insufficiency who had received intravenous Gd-based MR contrast agents. Although no patients in this trial had renal insufficiency, in cautious response to this announcement, the trial protocol was changed from an intravenous administration of 0.2 mmol/Kg of a conventional Gd-based MR contrast agent to 0.1 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine. The study described herein compares the signal quality of pulmonary MRA performed with double dose conventional agent to single dose gadobenate dimeglumine. This study is a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter study in men and women ≥18 years with documented presence or absence of PE. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at all participating centers, and all patients provided written indication of informed consent. We performed both objective and subjective analysis of pulmonary artery image quality. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the main pulmonary artery were assessed in single and double dose protocols and compared. SNR and CNR of the main PA were correlated with subjective quality assessment of main/lobar, segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries. Although there were individual outliers, both SNR (P = 0.01) and CNR (P = 0.008) were higher in all quartiles for examinations using gadobenate dimeglumine than with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Subjective quality of vascular signal intensity at each vessel order was significantly better for gadobenate dimeglumine (P < 0.0001), and correlated well with SNR and CNR at each order (<0.001). Because of agent high relaxivity, a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine provides better pulmonary MRA signal quality than double dose of a conventional Gd-based MR contrast agent.

Project description:To evaluate the effect of abruptly substituting gadobenate dimeglumine for gadopentetate dimeglumine on allergic-like reactions.The institutional review board approved and waived patient consent for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Allergic-like reactions related to gadolinium-based contrast media were assessed 2 years before and 3.5 years after gadobenate dimeglumine was substituted for gadopentetate dimeglumine. Reaction rates and severity were compared by using χ(2) tests, Fisher exact tests, odds ratios (ORs), and confidence intervals (CIs).Allergic-like reactions (137 mild, 19 moderate, and six severe) occurred in 162 (0.15%) of 105 607 injections of gadolinium-based contrast media (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 31 540; gadobenate dimeglumine, 66 152; other, 7915). Gadobenate dimeglumine was associated with significantly more overall (0.19% [123 of 66 152] vs 0.08% [24 of 31 540]; OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.6, 3.8; P < .0001) and mild (0.16% [107 of 66 152] vs 0.06% [18 of 31 540]; OR, 2.8; 95% CI: 1.7, 4.7; P < .0001) allergic-like reactions than was gadopentetate dimeglumine. The reaction rate for gadobenate dimeglumine peaked (maximum per quarter, 0.38% [16 of 4262]; minimum per quarter, 0.07% [three of 4237]) in the 2nd year after it replaced gadopentetate dimeglumine (maximum per quarter, 0.10% [four of 4122]; minimum per quarter, 0.05% [two of 4222]) and then declined in the 3rd year. The final gadobenate dimeglumine reaction rate (last 3 quarters, 0.12% [17 of 14 387]) did not significantly differ from the original baseline reaction rate with gadopentetate dimeglumine.After gadobenate dimeglumine was substituted for gadopentetate dimeglumine, a significant transient increase occurred in the frequency of reported allergic-like reactions that demonstrated a temporal pattern suggestive of the Weber effect (a transient increase in adverse event reporting that tends to peak in the 2nd year after a new agent or indication is introduced). © RSNA, 2012.

Project description:Background and purposeGadobenate dimeglumine has markedly higher R1 relaxivity compared to gadopentetate dimeglumine meaning that lower doses can be used to achieve similar contrast enhancement. Our aim was to prospectively compare single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced MRA of the supra-aortic vasculature.Materials and methodsForty-six patients (37 men, 9 women; mean age, 63.5±10.1 years) with known or suspected steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic vessels underwent 2 identical CE-MRA examinations at 1.5T. Contrast agents were administered in randomized order, with the 2-fold greater volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine injected at a 2 times faster rate. Image assessment was performed by 3 independent blinded readers for vessel anatomic delineation, detection/exclusion of pathology, and global preference. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV) for detection of ≥60% stenosis was determined for 39/46 patients who underwent preinterventional DSA. Data were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank, McNemar, and Wald tests in terms of the noninferiority of single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine compared with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine. Quantitative enhancement (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) was also compared.ResultsAll images were technically adequate. No differences (P=1.0) were noted by any reader for any qualitative parameter. All readers considered single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine and double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine equivalent in at least 42/46 patients (91.3% three-reader agreement) for all parameters. Nonsignificant superiority for gadobenate dimeglumine was reported for all diagnostic performance indicators (sensitivity: 82.7%-88.5% versus 75.0%-80.8%; specificity: 96.4%-98.6% versus 94.6%-98.6%; accuracy: 94.6%-96.1% versus 92.4%-94.9%; PPV: 81.5%-91.5% versus 73.7%-90.7%; NPV: 96.8%-97.8% versus 95.4%-96.4%). No differences (P>.05) in quantitative enhancement were noted.ConclusionsThe image quality and diagnostic performance achieved with 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine is at least equivalent to that achieved with 0.2-mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Dataset Information

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fosaprepitant dimeglumine.

Publications

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fosaprepitant dimeglumine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets