Dataset Information

Best's macular dystrophy in Australia: phenotypic profile and identification of novel BEST1 mutations.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the spectrum of BEST1 mutations within Australian Best Disease or vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) pedigrees, including any novel mutations; (2) to analyse the range of clinical presentations of this cohort; (3) to determine any possible genotype-phenotype correlations and (4) to compare clinical data of patients with phenotypic VMD, both with and without a BEST1 mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected VMD were referred to clinical centres for ophthalmological assessment and genetic screening. When a mutation was identified in a proband, further family members were invited for clinical and genetic screening. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients with one of 13 BEST1 mutations. Seven mutations were novel. There were a further 14 probands in whom a BEST1 mutation was not identified. Median visual acuity in both VMD (mutation positive) and clinical VMD (no BEST1 mutation identified) groups reached driving standards (6/12 or better). CONCLUSION: We did not identify any firm genotype-phenotype correlations in our Australian VMD pedigrees, in which there was a spectrum of BEST1 mutations and marked variation in clinical presentation. Genetic screening remains the gold standard for VMD diagnosis. Patients should be counselled that visual acuity might remain at or above driving standards in at least one eye even in the presence of a BEST1 mutation.

SUBMITTER: Cohn AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3169215 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Best's macular dystrophy in Australia: phenotypic profile and identification of novel BEST1 mutations.

Cohn A C AC Turnbull C C Ruddle J B JB Guymer R H RH Kearns L S LS Staffieri S S Daggett H T HT Hewitt A W AW Mackey D A DA

Eye (London, England) 20101126 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>(1) To evaluate the spectrum of BEST1 mutations within Australian Best Disease or vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) pedigrees, including any novel mutations; (2) to analyse the range of clinical presentations of this cohort; (3) to determine any possible genotype-phenotype correlations and (4) to compare clinical data of patients with phenotypic VMD, both with and without a BEST1 mutation.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Patients with suspected VMD were referred to clinical centres ...[more]

PMID: 21109774

Similar Datasets

Project description:AIMS: To describe genetic and clinical findings in a French family affected by best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). METHODS: We screened eight at-risk members of a family, including a BVMD-affected proband, by direct sequencing of 11 bestrophin-1 (BEST1) exons. Individuals underwent ophthalmic examination and autofluorescent fundus imaging, indocyanine green angiography, electro-oculogram (EOG), electroretinogram (ERG), multifocal ERG, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and where possible, spectral domain OCT. RESULTS: The sequence analysis of the BEST1 gene revealed one previously unknown mutation, c.15C>A (p.Y5X), in two family members and one recently described mutation, c.430A>G (p.S144G), in five family members. Fundus examination and electrophysiological responses provided no evidence of the disease in the patient carrying only the p.Y5X mutation. Three patients with the p.S144G mutation did not show any preclinical sign of BVMD except altered EOGs. Two individuals of the family exhibited a particularly severe phenotype of multifocal BVMD-one individual carrying the p.S144G mutation heterozygously and one individual harboring both BEST1 mutations (p.S144G inherited from his mother and p.Y5X from his father). Both of these family members had multifocal vitelliform autofluorescent lesions combined with abnormal EOG, and the spectral domain OCT displayed a serous retinal detachment. In addition, ERGs demonstrated widespread retinal degeneration and multifocal ERGs showed a reduction in the central retina function, which could be correlated with the decreased visual acuity and visual field scotomas. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough clinical evaluation found no pathological phenotype in the patient carrying the isolated p.Y5X mutation. The patients carrying the p.S144G variation in the protein exhibited considerable intrafamilial phenotypic variability. Two young affected patients in this family exhibited an early onset, severe, multifocal BVMD with a diffuse distribution of autofluorescent deposits throughout the retina and rapid evolution toward the loss of central vision. The other genetically affected relatives had only abnormal EOGs and displayed no or extremely slow electrophysiological evolution.

Project description:PURPOSE: To analyze functional and clinical data of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) patients with mutations in the BEST1 gene. METHODS: Best VMD patients with BEST1 mutations were evaluated prospectively regarding age, age of onset, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and electro-oculography. Mutations in BEST1 were established by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes of 23 patients (10 male, 13 female) were included in the study. We identified nine different BEST1 mutations (3/9 novel), in ten unrelated families. The age of patients ranged between 3 and 75 years; age of onset varied between 2 and 67 years. BCVA ranged between 20/20 and 20/200. On the basis of fundus biomicroscopy with direct illumination, using one widely accepted classification, the macular lesions could be counted as follows: 1. no lesion (normal fovea): eight eyes, five patients carrying a mutation on the BEST1 gene; 2. previtelliform lesions: six eyes, three affected patients; 3. vitelliform lesions: four eyes, two affected patients; 4. pseudohypopyon: three eyes, three affected patients; 5. vitelliruptive lesions (scrambled egg aspect with dispersion of the vitelliform material without sign of atrophy or fibrosis): ten eyes, six affected patients; 6. atrophic lesions (atrophy with or without residual dispersed material): seven eyes, five patients; 7. fibrotic lesions: eight eyes, five patients. Two patients presented unilateral Best VMD. Both eyes of two patients presented multifocal Best VMD features on fundus examination. Six eyes of four patients have been treated for choroidal neovascularization by thermic photocoagulation [one eye], photodynamic therapy [three eyes], and intravitreal ranibizumab injection [two eyes]. Comparison of interfamilial and intrafamilial clinical data between patients did not reveal differences in age, BCVA, and stage of the disease as evaluated by fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (p>0.05). Mean BCVA impairment showed a statistically significant correlation to a more advanced stage of the disease (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BEST1 mutations were not correlated with the severity of the functional and clinical data in the Best VMD patients examined.

Dataset Information

Best's macular dystrophy in Australia: phenotypic profile and identification of novel BEST1 mutations.

Publications

Best's macular dystrophy in Australia: phenotypic profile and identification of novel BEST1 mutations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets