Dataset Information

Systematic review and meta-analysis of antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

ABSTRACT: Tests that detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in clinical specimens could provide rapid direct evidence of active disease. We performed a systematic review to assess the diagnostic accuracy of antigen detection tests for active tuberculosis (TB) according to standard methods and summarized test performance using bivariate random effects meta-analysis. Overall, study quality was a concern. For pulmonary TB (47 studies, 5,036 participants), sensitivity estimates ranged from 2% to 100% and specificity from 33% to 100%. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) was the antigen most frequently targeted (23 studies, 49%). The pooled sensitivity of urine LAM was higher in HIV-infected than HIV-uninfected individuals (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26 to 68% versus 14%; 95% CI, 4 to 38%); pooled specificity estimates were similar: 96%; 95% CI, 81 to 100% and 97%; 95% CI, 86 to 100%, respectively. For extrapulmonary TB (21 studies, 1,616 participants), sensitivity estimates ranged from 0% to 100% and specificity estimates from 62% to 100%. Five studies targeting LAM, ESAT-6, Ag85 complex, and the 65-kDa antigen in cerebrospinal fluid, when pooled, yielded the highest sensitivity (87%; 95% CI, 61 to 98%), but low specificity (84%; 95% CI, 60 to 95%). Because of the limited number of studies targeting any specific antigen other than LAM, we could not draw firm conclusions about the overall clinical usefulness of these tests. Further studies are warranted to determine the value of LAM detection for TB meningitis in high-HIV-prevalence settings. Considering that antigen detection tests could be translated into rapid point-of-care tests, research to improve their performance is urgently needed.

SUBMITTER: Flores LL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3187027 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systematic review and meta-analysis of antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Flores L L LL Steingart K R KR Dendukuri N N Schiller I I Minion J J Pai M M Ramsay A A Henry M M Laal S S

Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI 20110810 10

Tests that detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in clinical specimens could provide rapid direct evidence of active disease. We performed a systematic review to assess the diagnostic accuracy of antigen detection tests for active tuberculosis (TB) according to standard methods and summarized test performance using bivariate random effects meta-analysis. Overall, study quality was a concern. For pulmonary TB (47 studies, 5,036 participants), sensitivity estimates ranged from 2% to 100% and ...[more]

PMID: 21832100

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe global tuberculosis epidemic results in nearly 2 million deaths and 9 million new cases of the disease a year. The vast majority of tuberculosis patients live in developing countries, where the diagnosis of tuberculosis relies on the identification of acid-fast bacilli on unprocessed sputum smears using conventional light microscopy. Microscopy has high specificity in tuberculosis-endemic countries, but modest sensitivity which varies among laboratories (range 20% to 80%). Moreover, the sensitivity is poor for paucibacillary disease (e.g., pediatric and HIV-associated tuberculosis). Thus, the development of rapid and accurate new diagnostic tools is imperative. Immune-based tests are potentially suitable for use in low-income countries as some test formats can be performed at the point of care without laboratory equipment. Currently, dozens of distinct commercial antibody detection tests are sold in developing countries. The question is "do they work?"Methods and findingsWe conducted a systematic review to assess the accuracy of commercial antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Studies from all countries using culture and/or microscopy smear for confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis were eligible. Studies with fewer than 50 participants (25 patients and 25 control participants) were excluded. In a comprehensive search, we identified 68 studies. The results demonstrate that (1) overall, commercial tests vary widely in performance; (2) sensitivity is higher in smear-positive than smear-negative samples; (3) in studies of smear-positive patients, Anda-TB IgG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay shows limited sensitivity (range 63% to 85%) and inconsistent specificity (range 73% to 100%); (4) specificity is higher in healthy volunteers than in patients in whom tuberculosis disease is initially suspected and subsequently ruled out; and (5) there are insufficient data to determine the accuracy of most commercial tests in smear microscopy-negative patients, as well as their performance in children or persons with HIV infection.ConclusionsNone of the commercial tests evaluated perform well enough to replace sputum smear microscopy. Thus, these tests have little or no role in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Lack of methodological rigor in these studies was identified as a concern. It will be important to review the basic science literature evaluating serological tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis to determine whether useful antigens have been described but their potential has not been fully exploited. Activities leading to the discovery of new antigens with immunodiagnostic potential need to be intensified.

Project description:BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) is a global burden, and this is likely to remain the case due to a lack of adequate and accurate point-of-care diagnostic tests. Obtaining good-quality sputum from the bottom of the respiratory tract of children is challenging. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is a specific component of the mycobacterial cell envelope that is excreted in the urine of people with active TB. This study aimed to assess the performance of different types of urine-based LAM antigen tests for the diagnosis of TB in children.MethodsRelevant databases were searched for studies that used urine-based LAM tests to diagnose TB in children. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the random-effect model in STATA Version 16.0. Moreover, subgroup analysis was undertaken to hinder the heterogeneity of the studies.ResultsEleven articles were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MTB-LAM-ELISA), Alere Determine TB LAM Ag (Alere LAM) test and the Fujifilm SILVAMP TB LAM (Fuji LAM) test in children aged <15 years with TB were 16.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.25-42.25] and 95.61% (95% CI 93.74-97.74); 45.90% (95% CI 40.40-51.40) and 80.42% (95% CI 69.39-91.46); and 52.32% (95% CI 35.03-69.62) and 89.37% (95% CI 82.88-95.86), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of MTB-LAM-ELISA, Alere LAM test and Fuji LAM test were 33.5% (95% CI 34.86-100) and 95.83% (95% CI 91.50-100); 46.59% (95% CI 32.98-60.19) and 76.45% (95% CI 57.07-95.82); and 57.89% (95% CI 48.44-67.35%) and 87.66% (95% CI 75.29-100), respectively, in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive children; and 3.35% (95% CI 1.61-8.31) and 96.0% (95% CI 93.88-98.11); 32.33% (95% CI 7.63-57.03) and 79.07% (95% CI 62.62-95.51); and 50.95% (95% CI 27.45-74.45) and 89.47% (95% CI 84.72-94.22), respectively, in HIV-negative children.ConclusionThe Fuji LAM and Alere LAM tests may be useful for the diagnosis of TB in children in conjunction with other more sensitive and specific tests, although a prospective study in relevant clinical settings is needed to evaluate this. There is a need for more evidence-based data on the use of these rapid diagnostic tools to diagnose TB in children independent of HIV status.

Project description:Antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) used for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleocapsid protein are inexpensive, faster and easy to use alternative of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) for diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of Ag-RDTs in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of Ag-RDTs (sensitivity and specificity) against reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a reference standard. The study population comprised of people living in LMICs irrespective of age and gender, who had undergone testing for COVID-19. We included peer reviewed prospective or retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case control studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) as well as non-randomized experimental studies which addressed the review question. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 1 January, 2020 and 15 August, 2021. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality of studies. The analysis was done using Review Manager 5.4 and R software 4.0.2. From the total of 12 diagnostic accuracy studies with 4,817 study participants, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 78.2% and 99.5% respectively. Sensitivity was marginally higher in subgroup analysis based on studies with low risk of bias and applicability concerns (78.9%) and studies using SD Biosensor Ag-RDT (79.4%). However, an inverse relation between cycle threshold (Ct) and sensitivity of Ag-RDT was not seen. The review demonstrated pooled sensitivity value approaching the minimum performance requirement for diagnosis of COVID-19 by WHO with specificity value meeting the specified requirement. Ag-RDTs, therefore have the potential to be used as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low resource settings where RT-PCR might not be readily accessible. However, false negative results need to be interpreted with caution.

Project description:BackgroundSerological (antibody detection) tests for tuberculosis (TB) are widely used in developing countries. As part of a World Health Organization policy process, we performed an updated systematic review to assess the diagnostic accuracy of commercial serological tests for pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB with a focus on the relevance of these tests in low- and middle-income countries.Methods and findingsWe used methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and GRADE approach for rating quality of evidence. In a previous review, we searched multiple databases for papers published from 1 January 1990 to 30 May 2006, and in this update, we add additional papers published from that period until 29 June 2010. We prespecified subgroups to address heterogeneity and summarized test performance using bivariate random effects meta-analysis. For pulmonary TB, we included 67 studies (48% from low- and middle-income countries) with 5,147 participants. For all tests, estimates were variable for sensitivity (0% to 100%) and specificity (31% to 100%). For anda-TB IgG, the only test with enough studies for meta-analysis, pooled sensitivity was 76% (95% CI 63%-87%) in smear-positive (seven studies) and 59% (95% CI 10%-96%) in smear-negative (four studies) patients; pooled specificities were 92% (95% CI 74%-98%) and 91% (95% CI 79%-96%), respectively. Compared with ELISA (pooled sensitivity 60% [95% CI 6%-65%]; pooled specificity 98% [95% CI 96%-99%]), immunochromatographic tests yielded lower pooled sensitivity (53%, 95% CI 42%-64%) and comparable pooled specificity (98%, 95% CI 94%-99%). For extrapulmonary TB, we included 25 studies (40% from low- and middle-income countries) with 1,809 participants. For all tests, estimates were variable for sensitivity (0% to 100%) and specificity (59% to 100%). Overall, quality of evidence was graded very low for studies of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB.ConclusionsDespite expansion of the literature since 2006, commercial serological tests continue to produce inconsistent and imprecise estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Quality of evidence remains very low. These data informed a recently published World Health Organization policy statement against serological tests. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Dataset Information

Systematic review and meta-analysis of antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Publications

Systematic review and meta-analysis of antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets