Dataset Information

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

The SHIFT echocardiographic substudy evaluated the effects of ivabradine on left ventricular (LV) remodelling in heart failure (HF).

Methods and results

Eligible patients had chronic HF and systolic dysfunction [LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ?35%], were in sinus rhythm, and had resting heart rate ?70 bpm. Patients were randomly allocated to ivabradine or placebo, superimposed on background therapy for HF. Complete echocardiographic data at baseline and 8 months were available for 411 patients (ivabradine 208, placebo 203). Treatment with ivabradine reduced LVESVI (primary substudy endpoint) vs. placebo [-7.0 ± 16.3 vs. -0.9 ± 17.1 mL/m(2); difference (SE), -5.8 (1.6), 95% CI -8.8 to -2.7, P< 0.001]. The reduction in LVESVI was independent of beta-blocker use, HF aetiology, and baseline LVEF. Ivabradine also improved LV end-diastolic volume index (-7.9 ± 18.9 vs. -1.8 ± 19.0 mL/m(2), P= 0.002) and LVEF (+2.4 ± 7.7 vs. -0.1 ± 8.0%, P< 0.001). The incidence of the SHIFT primary composite outcome (cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for worsening HF) was higher in patients with LVESVI above the median (59 mL/m2) at baseline (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.03-2.56, P= 0.04). Patients with the largest relative reductions in LVESVI had the lowest event rates.

Conclusion

Ivabradine reverses cardiac remodelling in patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction.

SUBMITTER: Tardif JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3195263 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.

Tardif Jean-Claude JC O'Meara Eileen E Komajda Michel M Böhm Michael M Borer Jeffrey S JS Ford Ian I Tavazzi Luigi L Swedberg Karl K

European heart journal 20110829 20

<h4>Aims</h4>The SHIFT echocardiographic substudy evaluated the effects of ivabradine on left ventricular (LV) remodelling in heart failure (HF).<h4>Methods and results</h4>Eligible patients had chronic HF and systolic dysfunction [LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%], were in sinus rhythm, and had resting heart rate ≥70 bpm. Patients were randomly allocated to ivabradine or placebo, superimposed on background therapy for HF. Complete echocardiographic data at baseline and 8 months were available f ...[more]

PMID: 21875858

Similar Datasets

Project description:Heart rates during ischaemia and reperfusion are possible determinants of reperfusion arrhythmias. We used ivabradine, a selective If current inhibitor, to assess the effects of heart rate reduction (HRR) during ischaemia-reperfusion on reperfusion ventricular arrhythmias and assessed potential anti-arrhythmic mechanisms by optical mapping. Five groups of rat hearts were subjected to regional ischaemia by left anterior descending artery occlusion for 8min followed by 10min of reperfusion: (1) Control n=10; (2) 1?M of ivabradine perfusion n=10; (3) 1?M of ivabradine+5Hz atrial pacing throughout ischaemia-reperfusion n=5; (4) 1?M of ivabradine+5Hz pacing only at reperfusion; (5) 100?M of ivabradine was used as a 1ml bolus upon reperfusion. For optical mapping, 10 hearts (ivabradine n=5; 5Hz pacing n=5) were subjected to global ischaemia whilst transmembrane voltage transients were recorded. Epicardial activation was mapped, and the rate of development of ischaemia-induced electrophysiological changes was assessed. HRR observed in the ivabradine group during both ischaemia (195±11bpm vs. control 272±14bpm, p<0.05) and at reperfusion (168±13bpm vs. 276±14bpm, p<0.05) was associated with reduced reperfusion ventricular fibrillation (VF) incidence (20% vs. 90%, p<0.05). Pacing throughout ischaemia-reperfusion abolished the protective effects of ivabradine (100% VF), whereas pacing at reperfusion only partially attenuated this effect (40% VF). Ivabradine, given as a bolus at reperfusion, did not significantly affect VF incidence (80% VF). Optical mapping experiments showed a delay to ischaemia-induced conduction slowing (time to 50% conduction slowing: 10.2±1.3min vs. 5.1±0.7min, p<0.05) and to loss of electrical excitability in ivabradine-perfused hearts (27.7±4.3min vs. 14.5±0.6min, p<0.05). Ivabradine administered throughout ischaemia and reperfusion reduced reperfusion VF incidence through HRR. Heart rate during ischaemia is a major determinant of reperfusion arrhythmias. Heart rate at reperfusion alone was not a determinant of reperfusion VF, as neither a bolus of ivabradine nor pacing immediately prior to reperfusion significantly altered reperfusion VF incidence. This anti-arrhythmic effect of heart rate reduction during ischaemia may reflect slower development of ischaemia-induced electrophysiological changes.

Project description:AimsThe purpose of this study is to identify echocardiography predictors of clinical response and reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) treated with MitraClip.Method and resultsWe retrospectively analysed 86 high surgical risk patients with severe FMR; of those, 58 were implanted a MitraClip, and 28 received medical treatment and served as controls. At baseline and at 1-year follow-up, we performed clinical and echocardiography evaluation to assess global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work [global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), global work efficiency (GWE)]. Mitral regurgitation was significantly reduced after MitraClip implantation (3.7 ± 0.4 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), and the procedure was associated with improvement in brain natriuretic peptide levels (980 ± 1027 vs. 420 ± 338 pg/mL, P < 0.001), New York Heart Association class status (3.2 ± 0.55 vs. 2.0 ± 0.6, P < 0.001), 6-min walking test (233 ± 154 vs. 286 ± 114 m, P = 0.01) at follow-up and reduction of left ventricle end-systolic (LVESV) and left ventricle end-diastolic volumes (LVEDV) (152 ± 68 vs. 136 ± 43 mL, P = 0.004 & 219 ± 74 vs. 193 ± 66 mL, P = 0.001, respectively). MitraClip procedure was associated with improvement of LV performance and significant increase of GWI (607 ± 282 vs. 650 ± 260 mmHg%, P = 0.045) and GCW (854 ± 288 vs. 949 ± 325 mmHg%, P < 0.001). Baseline ejection fraction (EF), GLS, GWI, GCW, and effective regurgitant orifice area were the variables that were associated with reduction of LVEDV 1 year after intervention (P < 0.05 for all) and baseline GCW of the LV was the only variable associated with reduction of LVESV (P = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified that a GLS cut-off value of -8.65% (AUC 0.815, P = 0.007) was associated with a 20% reduction of the LVEDV with a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 70%, respectively, and that a GCW cut-off value of 846 mmHg% (AUC 0.759, P = 0.007) was associated with a 10% reduction of LVESV with sensitivity and specificity 79% and 74%, respectively.ConclusionsMitral valve repair with MitraClip has positive clinical and echocardiographic impact in patients with FMR 1 year after implantation. Preserved GLS and GCW values appear to be associated with LV reverse remodelling post intervention.

Dataset Information

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.

Aims

Methods and results

Conclusion

Publications

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets