Dataset Information

Patient-reported outcomes for irritable bowel syndrome are associated with patients' severity ratings of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological factors.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to gauge the benefit of treatments for functional gastrointestinal disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Commonly used end points derived from scales of symptom severity differ in their structure, format, and the extent to which they are based on established psychometric fundamentals. We evaluated the overlap between 2 measures of IBS symptom severity, documented their association with different symptoms (pain, bloating, altered defecation), and identified psychological factors that might bias PRO ratings, by affecting how patients interpret IBS symptom severity.

Methods

Ninety-eight patients diagnosed with IBS, based on Rome III criteria, completed the multicomponent IBS Symptom Severity Scale and the single-item, UCLA Symptom Severity Scale. Data were collected on pain, bloating, and bowel habits, as well as somatization, sensitivity to arousal symptoms (anxiety sensitivity), and a negative thinking style called pain catastrophizing.

Results

The 2 global scales were correlated with one another (r = 0.56); each scale was associated most strongly with variation in abdominal pain. Data were consistent with a model in which pain catastrophizing and somatization influenced 1 or more of patients' judgments of pain, bloating, and/or bowel habits, which then affected the PROs.

Conclusions

Depending on their structure and format, PROs can have different levels of sensitivity to core IBS symptoms and be influenced by psychological and somatic complaints that are beyond the aim of therapy and labeling claim. PROs that rely on patients' perspectives to index symptom severity can be improved by consideration of psychometric principles that influence self-report.

SUBMITTER: Lackner J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3200480 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient-reported outcomes for irritable bowel syndrome are associated with patients' severity ratings of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological factors.

Lackner Jeffrey J Jaccard James J Baum Charles C Smith Amanda A Krasner Susan S Katz Leonard L Firth Rebecca R Raby Tatayna T Powell Cathrine C

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 20110621 11

<h4>Background & aims</h4>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to gauge the benefit of treatments for functional gastrointestinal disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Commonly used end points derived from scales of symptom severity differ in their structure, format, and the extent to which they are based on established psychometric fundamentals. We evaluated the overlap between 2 measures of IBS symptom severity, documented their association with different symptoms (pain, bl ...[more]

PMID: 21699821

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsThere is an urgent need for safe treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that relieve treatment-refractory symptoms and their societal and economic burden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment that has not been broadly adopted into routine clinical practice. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess clinical responses to home-based CBT compared with clinic-based CBT and patient education.MethodsWe performed a prospective study of 436 patients with IBS, based on Rome III criteria, at 2 tertiary centers from August 23, 2010, through October 21, 2016. Subjects (41.4 ± 14.8 years old; 80% women) were randomly assigned to groups that received the following: standard-CBT (S-CBT, n = 146, comprising 10 weekly, 60-minute sessions that emphasized the provision of information about brain-gut interactions; self-monitoring of symptoms, their triggers, and consequences; muscle relaxation; worry control; flexible problem solving; and relapse prevention training), or 4 sessions of primarily home-based CBT requiring minimal therapist contact (MC-CBT, n = 145), in which patients received home-study materials covering the same procedures as S-CBT), or 4 sessions of IBS education (EDU, n = 145) that provided support and information about IBS and the role of lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, and exercise. The primary outcome was global improvement of IBS symptoms, based on the IBS-version of the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale. Ratings were performed by patients and board-certified gastroenterologists blinded to treatment allocation. Efficacy data were collected 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment completion.ResultsA higher proportion of patients receiving MC-CBT reported moderate to substantial improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms 2 weeks after treatment (61.0% based on ratings by patients and 55.7% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) than those receiving EDU (43.5% based on ratings patients and 40.4% based on ratings by gastroenterologists) (P < .05). Gastrointestinal symptom improvement, rated by gastroenterologists, 6 months after the end of treatment also differed significantly between the MC-CBT (58.4%) and EDU groups (44.8%) (P = .05). Formal equivalence testing applied across multiple contrasts indicated that MC-CBT is at least as effective as S-CBT in improving IBS symptoms. Patients tended to be more satisfied with CBT vs EDU (P < .05) based on immediate posttreatment responses to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Symptom improvement was not significantly related to concomitant use of medications.ConclusionsIn a randomized controlled trial, we found that a primarily home-based version of CBT produced significant and sustained gastrointestinal symptom improvement for patients with IBS compared with education. Clinicaltrials.gov no.: NCT00738920.

Project description:ObjectiveIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by disturbed interactions between the gut and the brain with depression as a common comorbidity. In both IBS and depression, structural brain alterations of the insular cortices, key structures for pain processing and interoception, have been demonstrated but the specificity of these findings remains unclear. We compared the gray matter volume (GMV) of insular cortex (IC) subregions in IBS women and healthy controls (HC) and examined relations to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and glutamate + glutamine (Glx) concentrations. We further analyzed GMV of IC subregions in women with major depression (MDD) compared to HC and addressed possible differences between depression, IBS, IBS with depression and HC.DesignWomen with IBS (n = 75), MDD (n = 41) and their respective HC (n = 39 and n = 43) underwent structural brain MRI. IC subregion volumes were estimated using statistical parametric mapping software. General linear model approaches were applied to IC volumetric data and FDR-corrected partial correlation analyses assessed relations between GMV, GI symptoms and Glx concentrations.ResultsIBS patients had significantly smaller IC subregions than HC in both hemispheres but there was no significant difference between MDD compared with IBS and HC for any insular subregion. In IBS, the dorsal anterior insular volumes were negatively correlated with symptoms of nausea and pain, and the left ventral subregion showed a positive correlation with straining to defecate, while the posterior subregion volumes showed no relation to symptoms. In the anterior insula, concentration of Glx showed positive correlations with GMV bilaterally in HC and with GMV of the right anterior insula in IBS.ConclusionAs the interoceptive cortex, the insula shows substantial and disease-specific structural differences in patients with chronic interoceptive visceral pain. Particularly changes in the anterior proportions might be related to chronic exposure to or enhanced salience towards adverse interoceptive visceral signals and could be linked to biochemical changes, calling for further multimodal and longitudinal work.

Project description:BackgroundThe intestinal microbiota is thought to be involved in the occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease in remission with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-type symptoms, but the specific distinct profile of these bacteria remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the fecal microbiota profiling in patients with these diseases.MethodsFecal samples from 97 subjects, including Crohn's disease patients in remission with IBS-type symptoms (CDR-IBS+) or without IBS-type symptoms (CDR-IBS-), ulcerative colitis patients in remission with IBS-type symptoms (UCR-IBS+) or without IBS-type symptoms (UCR-IBS-), IBS patients and healthy controls, were collected and applied 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene sequencing. The V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rDNA gene were amplified and sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq platform. The differences in the sample diversity index in groups were analyzed with R software.ResultsThe richness of the intestinal microbiota in the CDR-IBS group was markedly lower than those in the control and IBS groups based on the analysis of observed species and the Chao index (P < 0.05). The observed species index in the CDR-IBS+ group was higher than that in the CDR-IBS- group (median index: 254.8 vs 203, P = 0.036). No difference was found in alpha diversity between UCR patients with IBS-type symptoms and those without related symptoms. At the genus level, the number of Faecalibacterium in CDR patients with IBS-type symptoms increased significantly, while Fusobacterium decreased versus those without such symptoms (mean relative abundance of Faecalibacterium: 20.35% vs 5.18%, P < 0.05; Fusobacterium: 1.51% vs 5.2%, P < 0.05). However, compared with the UCR-IBS- group, the number of Faecalibacterium in the UCR-IBS+ group decreased, while the number of Streptococcus increased, but there was no significant difference in the genus structure. The abundance and composition of the microbiota of IBS patients were not distinct from those of healthy controls.ConclusionsThe IBS-type symptoms in CD patients in remission may be related to an increase in Faecalibacterium and a decrease in Fusobacterium. The IBS-type symptoms in UC patients in remission cannot be explained by changes in the abundance and structure of the intestinal microbiota.

Dataset Information

Patient-reported outcomes for irritable bowel syndrome are associated with patients' severity ratings of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological factors.

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Patient-reported outcomes for irritable bowel syndrome are associated with patients' severity ratings of gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological factors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets