Dataset Information

The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A previous Australian population-based breast cancer case-control study found indirect evidence that control participation, although high, was not random. We hypothesized that unaffected sisters may provide a more appropriate comparison group than unrelated population controls.

Methods

Three population-based case-control-family studies of breast cancer in women of white European origin were carried out by the Australian, Ontario and Northern California sites of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. We compared risk factors between 3643 cases, 2444 of their unaffected sisters and 2877 population controls and conducted separate case-control analyses based on population and sister controls using unconditional multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Compared with sister controls, population controls were more highly educated, had an earlier age at menarche, fewer births, their first birth at a later age and their last birth more recently. The established breast cancer associations detected using sister controls, but not detected using population controls, were decreasing risk with each of later age at menarche, more births, younger age at first birth and greater time since last birth.

Conclusions

Since participation of population controls might be unintentionally related to some risk factors, we hypothesize that sister controls could provide more valid relative risk estimates and be recruited at lower cost. Given declining study participation by population controls, this contention is highly relevant to epidemiologic research.

SUBMITTER: Milne RL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3204209 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Milne Roger L RL John Esther M EM Knight Julia A JA Dite Gillian S GS Southey Melissa C MC Giles Graham G GG Apicella Carmel C West Dee W DW Andrulis Irene L IL Whittemore Alice S AS Hopper John L JL

International journal of epidemiology 20110719 5

<h4>Background</h4>A previous Australian population-based breast cancer case-control study found indirect evidence that control participation, although high, was not random. We hypothesized that unaffected sisters may provide a more appropriate comparison group than unrelated population controls.<h4>Methods</h4>Three population-based case-control-family studies of breast cancer in women of white European origin were carried out by the Australian, Ontario and Northern California sites of the Brea ...[more]

PMID: 21771852

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the occurrence of injuries in adolescents with childhood-onset epilepsy and matched sibling controls.Study designRetrospective case-control lifetime injury assessments were obtained from a community-based cohort of adolescents with childhood-onset epilepsy diagnosed 9 years earlier and their siblings. The children with epilepsy (n = 501; mean age, 15.3 years) included those with complicated (abnormal neurologic examination or IQ <80; n = 133) and uncomplicated (normal neurologic examination and IQ ?80; n = 368) epilepsy. Children with uncomplicated epilepsy were matched to sibling controls (n = 210 pairs). The children reported whether or not they had ever (before and after epilepsy diagnosis) experienced injuries "serious enough to require medical attention" and if so, the type of treatment required.ResultsAlmost one-half (49.1%) of the children with epilepsy experienced injury, of whom 8.9% required surgery/hospitalization and 17.1% had injury related to a seizure. Fewer children with uncomplicated epilepsy had seizure-related injuries versus those with complicated epilepsy (13.6% vs 27.4%; P ? .01). The proportion of children with epilepsy with any injury by type (not mutually exclusive) were: 25.2% with fractures (n = 126); 24.4% with head injuries (n = 122); 10.2% with other injuries (n = 51); 8.4% with dental injuries (n = 42); and 8% with burns/scalds (n = 40). A similar proportion of children with uncomplicated epilepsy experienced any injury (overall and by type) compared to matched sibling controls, with the exception that more children with uncomplicated epilepsy had head injuries (30.0% vs 19.5%; P < .02).ConclusionWith the exception of head injuries, we found no evidence of an increased risk of injury in a representative cohort of children with epilepsy compared with matched sibling controls. This finding may reflect the fact that the sample was not biased to more severe cases, or that safety precautions to prevent injury were widely used.

Project description:BackgroundVariable selection is an important issue in many fields such as public health and psychology. Researchers often gather data on many variables of interest and then are faced with two challenging goals: building an accurate model with few predictors, and making probabilistic statements (inference) about this model. Unfortunately, it is currently difficult to attain these goals with the two most popular methods for variable selection methods: stepwise selection and LASSO. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the use predictive projection feature selection - a novel Bayesian variable selection method that delivers both predictive power and inference. We apply predictive projection to a sample of New Zealand young adults, use it to build a compact model for predicting well-being, and compare it to other variable selection methods.MethodsThe sample consisted of 791 young adults (ages 18 to 25, 71.7% female) living in Dunedin, New Zealand who had taken part in the Daily Life Study in 2013-2014. Participants completed a 13-day online daily diary assessment of their well-being and a range of lifestyle variables (e.g., sleep, physical activity, diet variables). The participants' diary data was averaged across days and analyzed cross-sectionally to identify predictors of average flourishing. Predictive projection was used to select as few predictors as necessary to approximate the predictive accuracy of a reference model with all 28 predictors. Predictive projection was also compared to other variable selection methods, including stepwise selection and LASSO.ResultsThree predictors were sufficient to approximate the predictions of the reference model: higher sleep quality, less trouble concentrating, and more servings of fruit. The performance of the projected submodel generalized well. Compared to other variable selection methods, predictive projection produced models with either matching or slightly worse performance; however, this performance was achieved with much fewer predictors.ConclusionPredictive projection was used to efficiently arrive at a compact model with good predictive accuracy. The predictors selected into the submodel - felt refreshed after waking up, had less trouble concentrating, and ate more servings of fruit - were all theoretically meaningful. Our findings showcase the utility of predictive projection in a practical variable selection problem.

Project description:Background/Objectives:Obesity markers evolve over time and these changes are shared within the family orbit and governed by individual and environmental characteristics. Available reports often lack an integrated approach, in contrast to a multilevel framework that considers their concurrent influence. Hence, this study aims to (1) describe mean changes in obesity markers (body fat (%BF), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC)) across sib-ships; (2) analyze tracking of individuals within their sib-ship in these markers during 2 years of follow-up; (3) probe consistency in sibling resemblance in these markers; and (4) analyze the joint influence of individual and familial characteristics in these markers. Subjects/Methods:The sample comprises 168 biological Portuguese siblings (brother-brother (BB), sister-sister (SS), and brother-sister (BS)) aged 9-17 years. %BF, BMI, and WC were measured using standardized protocols, and biological maturation was assessed. Physical activity, diet, screen time, and familial characteristics were obtained by questionnaires. Multilevel models were used to analyze the clustered longitudinal data. Sibling resemblance was estimated with the intraclass correlation. Results:On average, all sib types increased in BMI and WC over 2 years of follow-up, and SS pairs increased in %BF. Individuals within sib-ships track high in all obesity markers across time. Consistency in siblings' resemblance was also noted, except for BB pairs in %BF which decreased at follow-up. More maturing siblings tend to have higher values in all markers. Greater screen time was associated with higher %BF, whereas those consuming more sugary drinks had lower %BF and BMI values. Siblings whose mothers had less qualified occupations tended to have lower BMI values. Conclusions:Longitudinal individual tracking and sibling resemblance for obesity markers were found. Yet, different trajectories were also identified depending on the marker and sib type. Individual and familial characteristics exert different influences on each obesity marker.

Dataset Information

The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets