Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Free energy simulations of ligand binding to the aspartate transporter Glt(Ph).

ABSTRACT: Glutamate/Aspartate transporters cotransport three Na(+) and one H(+) ions with the substrate and countertransport one K(+) ion. The binding sites for the substrate and two Na(+) ions have been observed in the crystal structure of the archeal homolog Glt(Ph), while the binding site for the third Na(+) ion has been proposed from computational studies and confirmed by experiments. Here we perform detailed free energy simulations of Glt(Ph), giving a comprehensive characterization of the substrate and ion binding sites, and calculating their binding free energies in various configurations. Our results show unequivocally that the substrate binds after the binding of two Na(+) ions. They also shed light into Asp/Glu selectivity of Glt(Ph), which is not observed in eukaryotic glutamate transporters.

SUBMITTER: Heinzelmann G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3218339 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Free energy simulations of ligand binding to the aspartate transporter Glt(Ph).

Heinzelmann Germano G Baştuğ Turgut T Kuyucak Serdar S

Biophysical journal 20111115 10

Glutamate/Aspartate transporters cotransport three Na(+) and one H(+) ions with the substrate and countertransport one K(+) ion. The binding sites for the substrate and two Na(+) ions have been observed in the crystal structure of the archeal homolog Glt(Ph), while the binding site for the third Na(+) ion has been proposed from computational studies and confirmed by experiments. Here we perform detailed free energy simulations of Glt(Ph), giving a comprehensive characterization of the substrate ...[more]

PMID: 22098736

Similar Datasets

Free-Energy Simulations Resolve the Low-Affinity Na+-High-Affinity Asp Binding Paradox in GltPh.

Project description:Glutamate transporters clear up excess extracellular glutamate by cotransporting three Na+ and one H+ with the countertransport of one K+. The archaeal homologs are selective to aspartate and only cotransport three Na+. The crystal structures of GltPh from archaea have been used in computational studies to understand the transport mechanism. Although some progress has been made with regard to the ligand-binding sites, a consistent picture of transport still eludes us. A major concern is the discrepancy between the computed binding free energies, which predict high-affinity Na+-low-affinity aspartate binding, and the experimental results in which the opposite is observed. Here, we show that the binding of the first two Na+ ions involves an intermediate state near the Na1 site, where two Na+ ions coexist and couple to aspartate with similar strengths, boosting its affinity. Binding free energies for Na+ and aspartate obtained using this intermediate state are in good agreement with the experimental values. Thus, the paradox in binding affinities arises from the assumption that the ligands bind to the sites observed in the crystal structure following the order dictated by their binding free energies with no intermediate states. In fact, the presence of an intermediate state eliminates such a correlation between the binding free energies and the binding order. The intermediate state also facilitates transition of the first Na+ ion to its final binding site via a knock-on mechanism, which induces substantial conformational changes in the protein consistent with experimental observations.

| S-EPMC6712548 | biostudies-literature

CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator for Practical Ligand Binding Free Energy Simulations with AMBER.

Project description:Alchemical free energy methods, such as free energy perturbation (FEP) and thermodynamic integration (TI), become increasingly popular and crucial for drug design and discovery. However, the system preparation of alchemical free energy simulation is an error-prone, time-consuming, and tedious process for a large number of ligands. To address this issue, we have recently presented CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator that can provide input and postprocessing scripts for NAMD and GENESIS FEP molecular dynamics systems. In this work, we extended three submodules of Free Energy Calculator to work with the full suite of GPU-accelerated alchemical free energy methods and tools in AMBER, including input and postprocessing scripts. The BACE1 (β-secretase 1) benchmark set was used to validate the AMBER-TI simulation systems and scripts generated by Free Energy Calculator. The overall results of relatively large and diverse systems are almost equivalent with different protocols (unified and split) and with different timesteps (1, 2, and 4 fs), with R2 > 0.9. More importantly, the average free energy differences between two protocols are small and reliable with four independent runs, with a mean unsigned error (MUE) below 0.4 kcal/mol. Running at least four independent runs for each pair with AMBER20 (and FF19SB/GAFF2.1/OPC force fields), we obtained a MUE of 0.99 kcal/mol and root-mean-square error of 1.31 kcal/mol for 58 alchemical transformations in comparison with experimental data. In addition, a set of ligands for T4-lysozyme was used to further validate our free energy calculation protocol whose results are close to experimental data (within 1 kcal/mol). In summary, Free Energy Calculator provides a user-friendly web-based tool to generate the AMBER-TI system and input files for high-throughput binding free energy calculations with access to the full set of GPU-accelerated alchemical free energy, enhanced sampling, and analysis methods in AMBER.

| S-EPMC8491128 | biostudies-literature

Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations.

Project description:A general methodology for calculating the equilibrium binding constant of a flexible ligand to a protein receptor is formulated on the basis of potentials of mean force. The overall process is decomposed into several stages that can be computed separately: the free ligand in the bulk is first restrained into the conformation it adopts in the bound state, position, and orientation by applying biasing potentials, then it is translated into the binding site, where it is released completely. The conformational restraining potential is based on the root-mean-square deviation of the peptide coordinates relative to its average conformation in the bound complex. Free energy contributions from each stage are calculated by means of free energy perturbation potential of mean force techniques by using appropriate order parameters. The present approach avoids the need to decouple the ligand from its surrounding (bulk solvent and receptor protein) as is traditionally performed in the double-decoupling scheme. It is believed that the present formulation will be particularly useful when the solvation free energy of the ligand is very large. As an application, the equilibrium binding constant of the phosphotyrosine peptide pYEEI to the Src homology 2 domain of human Lck has been calculated. The results are in good agreement with experimental values.

| S-EPMC1100764 | biostudies-literature

CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator for Absolute and Relative Ligand Solvation and Binding Free Energy Simulations.

Project description:Alchemical free energy simulations have long been utilized to predict free energy changes for binding affinity and solubility of small molecules. However, while the theoretical foundation of these methods is well established, seamlessly handling many of the practical aspects regarding the preparation of the different thermodynamic end states of complex molecular systems and the numerous processing scripts often remains a burden for successful applications. In this work, we present CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator (http://www.charmm-gui.org/input/fec) that provides various alchemical free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) systems with input and post-processing scripts for NAMD and GENESIS. Four submodules are available: Absolute Ligand Binder (for absolute ligand binding FEP/MD), Relative Ligand Binder (for relative ligand binding FEP/MD), Absolute Ligand Solvator (for absolute ligand solvation FEP/MD), and Relative Ligand Solvator (for relative ligand solvation FEP/MD). Each module is designed to build multiple systems of a set of selected ligands at once for high-throughput FEP/MD simulations. The capability of Free Energy Calculator is illustrated by absolute and relative solvation FEP/MD of a set of ligands and absolute and relative binding FEP/MD of a set of ligands for T4-lysozyme in solution and the adenosine A2A receptor in a membrane. The calculated free energy values are overall consistent with the experimental and published free energy results (within ?1 kcal/mol). We hope that Free Energy Calculator is useful to carry out high-throughput FEP/MD simulations in the field of biomolecular sciences and drug discovery.

| S-EPMC7658063 | biostudies-literature

Binding and transport of D-aspartate by the glutamate transporter homolog GltTk.

Project description:Mammalian glutamate transporters are crucial players in neuronal communication as they perform neurotransmitter reuptake from the synaptic cleft. Besides L-glutamate and L-aspartate, they also recognize D-aspartate, which might participate in mammalian neurotransmission and/or neuromodulation. Much of the mechanistic insight in glutamate transport comes from studies of the archeal homologs GltPh from Pyrococcus horikoshii and GltTk from Thermococcus kodakarensis. Here, we show that GltTk transports D-aspartate with identical Na+: substrate coupling stoichiometry as L-aspartate, and that the affinities (Kd and Km) for the two substrates are similar. We determined a crystal structure of GltTk with bound D-aspartate at 2.8 Å resolution. Comparison of the L- and D-aspartate bound GltTk structures revealed that D-aspartate is accommodated with only minor rearrangements in the structure of the binding site. The structure explains how the geometrically different molecules L- and D-aspartate are recognized and transported by the protein in the same way.

| S-EPMC6482001 | biostudies-literature

BRIDGE: An Open Platform for Reproducible Protein-Ligand Simulations and Free Energy of Binding Calculations.

Project description:Protein-ligand binding prediction is central to the drug-discovery process. This often follows an analysis of genomics data for protein targets and then protei n structure discovery. However, the complexity of performing reproducible protein conformational analysis and ligand binding calculations, using vetted methods and protocols can be a challenge. Here we show how Biomolecular Reaction and Interaction Dynamics Global Environment (BRIDGE), an open-source web-based compute and analytics platform for computational chemistry developed based on the Galaxy bioinformatics platform, makes protocol sharing seamless following genomics and proteomics. BRIDGE makes available tools and workflows to carry out protein molecular dynamics simulations and accurate free energy computations of protein-ligand binding. We illustrate the dynamics and simulation protocols for predicting protein-ligand binding affinities in silico on the T4 lysozyme system. This protocol is suitable for both novice and experienced practitioners. We show that with BRIDGE, protocols can be shared with collaborators or made publicly available, thus making simulation results and computations independently verifiable and reproducible.

| S-EPMC7842724 | biostudies-literature

Intracellular gating in an inward-facing state of aspartate transporter Glt(Ph) is regulated by the movements of the helical hairpin HP2.

Project description:Sodium-coupled neurotransmitter transporters play a key role in neuronal signaling by clearing excess transmitter from the synapse. Structural data on a trimeric archaeal aspartate transporter, Glt(Ph), have provided valuable insights into structural features of human excitatory amino acid transporters. However, the time-resolved mechanisms of substrate binding and release, as well as that of coupling to sodium co-transport, remain largely unknown for this important family. We present here the results of the most extensive simulations performed to date for Glt(Ph) in both outward-facing and inward-facing states by taking advantage of significant advances made in recent years in molecular simulation technology. The generated multiple microsecond trajectories consistently show that the helical hairpin HP2, not HP1, serves as an intracellular gate (in addition to its extracellular gating role). In contrast to previous proposals, HP1 can neither initiate nor accommodate neurotransmitter release without prior opening of HP2 by at least 4.0 Å. Aspartate release invariably follows that of a sodium ion located near the HP2 gate entrance. Asp-394 on TM8 and Arg-276 on HP1 emerge as key residues that promote the reorientation and diffusion of substrate toward the cell interior. These findings underscore the significance of examining structural dynamics, as opposed to static structure(s), to make inferences on the mechanisms of transport and key interactions.

| S-EPMC3605641 | biostudies-literature

Study of SQ109 analogs binding to mycobacterium MmpL3 transporter using MD simulations and alchemical relative binding free energy calculations.

Project description:N-geranyl-N΄-(2-adamantyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (SQ109) is a tuberculosis drug that has high potency against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and may function by blocking cell wall biosynthesis. After the crystal structure of MmpL3 from Mycobacterium smegmatis in complex with SQ109 became available, it was suggested that SQ109 inhibits Mmpl3 mycolic acid transporter. Here, we showed using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that the binding profile of nine SQ109 analogs with inhibitory potency against Mtb and alkyl or aryl adducts at C-2 or C-1 adamantyl carbon to MmpL3 was consistent with the X-ray structure of MmpL3 - SQ109 complex. We showed that rotation of SQ109 around carbon-carbon bond in the monoprotonated ethylenediamine unit favors two gauche conformations as minima in water and lipophilic solvent using DFT calculations as well as inside the transporter's binding area using MD simulations. The binding assays in micelles suggested that the binding affinity of the SQ109 analogs was increased for the larger, more hydrophobic adducts, which was consistent with our results from MD simulations of the SQ109 analogues suggesting that sizeable C-2 adamantyl adducts of SQ109 can fill a lipophilic region between Y257, Y646, F260 and F649 in MmpL3. This was confirmed quantitatively by our calculations of the relative binding free energies using the thermodynamic integration coupled with MD simulations method with a mean assigned error of 0.74 kcal mol-1 compared to the experimental values.

| S-EPMC10232594 | biostudies-literature

Practical Guidance for Consensus Scoring and Force Field Selection in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Simulations.

Project description:The advances in ligand binding affinity prediction have been fostered by system generation tools and improved force fields (FFs). CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator provides input and postprocessing scripts for AMBER-TI free energy calculations with various FFs. In this study, we used 12 different FF combinations (ff14SB and ff19SB for protein, GAFF2.2 and OpenFF for ligand, and TIP3P, TIP4PEW, and OPC for water) to calculate relative binding free energies (ΔΔGbind) for 80 alchemical transformations (among the JACS benchmark set) with different numbers of λ windows (12 or 21) and simulation times (1, 5, or 10 ns). Our results show that 12 λ windows and 5 ns simulation time for each window are sufficient to obtain reliable ΔΔGbind with 4 independent runs for the current benchmark set. While there is no statistically noticeable performance difference among 12 different FF combinations compared to the experimental values, a combination of ff14SB + GAFF2.2 + TIP3P FFs appears to be best with a mean unsigned error of 0.87 [0.69, 1.07] kcal/mol, a root-mean-square error of 1.22 [0.94, 1.50] kcal/mol, a Pearson's correlation of 0.64 [0.52, 0.76], a Spearman's correlation of 0.73 [0.58, 0.83], and a Kendell's correlation of 0.54 [0.42, 0.64]. This large-scale ΔΔGbind calculation study provides useful information about ΔΔGbind prediction with different AMBER FF combinations and presents valuable suggestions for FF selection in AMBER-TI ΔΔGbind calculations.

| S-EPMC9772090 | biostudies-literature

Adapting free energy perturbation simulations for large macrocyclic ligands: how to dissect contributions from direct binding and free ligand flexibility.

Project description:Large and flexible ligands gain increasing interest in the development of bioactive agents. They challenge the applicability of computational ligand optimization strategies originally developed for small molecules. Free energy perturbation (FEP) is often used for predicting binding affinities of small molecule ligands, however, its use for more complex ligands remains limited. Herein, we report the structure-based design of peptide macrocycles targeting the protein binding site of human adaptor protein 14-3-3. We observe a surprisingly strong dependency of binding affinities on relatively small variations in substituent size. FEP was performed to rationalize observed trends. To account for insufficient convergence of FEP, restrained calculations were performed and complemented with extensive REST MD simulations of the free ligands. These calculations revealed that changes in affinity originate both from altered direct interactions and conformational changes of the free ligand. In addition, MD simulations provided the basis to rationalize unexpected trends in ligand lipophilicity. We also verified the anticipated interaction site and binding mode for one of the high affinity ligands by X-ray crystallography. The introduced fully-atomistic simulation protocol can be used to rationalize the development of structurally complex ligands which will support future ligand maturation efforts.

| S-EPMC7057854 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data