Unknown

Dataset Information

0

CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions.


ABSTRACT: We present an overview of the ninth round of Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP9) "Template free modeling" category (FM). Prediction models were evaluated using a combination of established structural and sequence comparison measures and a novel automated method designed to mimic manual inspection by capturing both global and local structural features. These scores were compared to those assigned manually over a diverse subset of target domains. Scores were combined to compare overall performance of participating groups and to estimate rank significance. Moreover, we discuss a few examples of free modeling targets to highlight the progress and bottlenecks of current prediction methods. Notably, a server prediction model for a single target (T0581) improved significantly over the closest structure template (44% GDT increase). This accomplishment represents the "winner" of the CASP9 FM category. A number of human expert groups submitted slight variations of this model, highlighting a trend for human experts to act as "meta predictors" by correctly selecting among models produced by the top-performing automated servers. The details of evaluation are available at http://prodata.swmed.edu/CASP9/ .

SUBMITTER: Kinch L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3226891 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions.

Kinch Lisa L   Yong Shi Shuo S   Cong Qian Q   Cheng Hua H   Liao Yuxing Y   Grishin Nick V NV  

Proteins 20111014


We present an overview of the ninth round of Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP9) "Template free modeling" category (FM). Prediction models were evaluated using a combination of established structural and sequence comparison measures and a novel automated method designed to mimic manual inspection by capturing both global and local structural features. These scores were compared to those assigned manually over a diverse subset of target domains. Scores were combined to com  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3232368 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5628505 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3212657 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3226894 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3226935 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3226919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3692002 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3238793 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4841752 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10701718 | biostudies-literature